Sentences with phrase «used by creationists»

This is one common intellectual trick used by creationists — shift around your definitions as needed in order to manufacture apparent contradictions or at least confusion.

For those who don't know, the QMP is an effort to look up many of the evolution quotes used by the creationists who have a habit of providing quote after quote to «prove» their case.

Of course I just made that up much like the «science» used by Creationists in an attempt to discredit real science.

And your definition of microevolution is different from the one used by creationists

Those terms you use are just a smoke screen used by creationists.

Not exact matches

macro evolution is a term used as a smoke screen by creationists.

Some evolutionary creationists have argued that this non-randomness of evolution is a way that God uses evolution to shape His creation (the best work on this topic is Life's Solution by noted Cambrian paleontologist Simon Conway Morris).

«The creationist side use to stick to the 6000 year calculation based on ages of people recorded in the Bible until certain trees have been demonstrated to be over 10,000 years old by counting their growth rings.»

The one thing I need explained by creationists is why did God create man to have to use the restroom?

As shown by the Dover trial, creationists will use any underhanded, sneaky, backdoor attempt to get their religious views accepted as on par with science.

By opting out of the national curriculum, creationists and other pseudo-scientists are able to use free schools to get access to our children.

In January 2009, the Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) approved a policy that prevents Louisiana school boards from stopping schools using supplementary creationist texts hostile to evolution, such as books published by the Discovery Institute.

Three things happened to the TEKS and all - science education standard that called for teaching the strength and weaknesses of theories, which had, back in the last time biology text books were adopted in the mid»90s, had been used as a club to beat publishers over whether or not they included weaknesses of evolution; by which they may enlist creationists and their claims, was taken out by the writing committees and attempted to be put back on several occasions actually by the school board members.

The central argument used by the flagship creationist book on human evolution is so feeble that Answers in Genesis has disowned it - even though they enthusiastically promote that book.

I can almost always predict what silly reasoning AGW denialists will use, because I'm already familiar with the reasoning used by AIDS denialists and other science denialists (such as young Earth creationists); Denialists tend draw on the same pool of tactics.