Again, it seems more shameful tactics are being sought and
used by anthropogenic climate change alarmists, instead of empirical scientific arguments they have resorted to bright flashing colorful distractions.
Not exact matches
The researchers showed that the
climate change models
used by the IPCC underestimate Africa's emissions, which could account for 20 - 55 % of global
anthropogenic emissions of gaseous and particulate pollutants
by 2030.
«Based on these studies, and many others
using fossil and historical records, we argue that evidence for the widely cited view that future
climate change poses an equal or greater threat to global biodiversity than
anthropogenic land -
use change and habitat loss (Thomas et al., 2004) is equivocal: extinctions driven
by the latter processes of habitat loss pose a far greater threat to global biodiversity.
CAGW or Catastrophic
Anthropogenic Global Warming is the acronym
used (mostly
by those that don't support taking immediate action on
climate change) for the theory (or collection of hypotheses) that attribute most of the observed modern warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecosystems.
Current attempts
by national governments worldwide to control industrial CO2 emissions following the recommendations of the IPCC could be viewed within the scientific paradigm as the projection of a large scale experiment on the earth's
climate system to validate the hypothesis that
anthropogenic CO2 emissions through the burning of fossil fuels and land
use changes (inter alia) are a major factor driving
climate change.
A quote from Micha Tomkiewicz's «counter-viewpoint» paper: «It is based on the understanding that
anthropogenic climate change is caused primarily
by changes in the chemistry of the atmosphere due to dominant
use of fossil fuels.»
2.1.3 A scientific test
Anthropogenic fossil energy use is changing climate by X with a probability of exceeding natural variation with historic anthropogenic
Anthropogenic fossil energy
use is
changing climate by X with a probability of exceeding natural variation with historic
anthropogenic anthropogenic impacts of Y.
Cultural Framing of Skeptical and Convinced Logics in the
Climate Change Debate and his equivocation by using «climate change» for «anthropogenic climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
Climate Change Debate and his equivocation by using «climate change» for «anthropogenic climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
Change Debate and his equivocation
by using «
climate change» for «anthropogenic climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
climate change» for «anthropogenic climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
change» for «
anthropogenic climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
change» or «catastrophic
anthropogenic climate change»
climate change»
change» etc..
We'd driving the models with the GHG concentrations, and
using carbon cycle models within the
climate models to simulate the natural carbon fluxes (atmosphere - land and atmosphere - ocean), which themselves are affected
by the simulated
climate change, and the residual needed to balance the carbon budget then indicates the
anthropogenic emissions that would give the prescribed scenario of CO2 rise.
Deng et al., 2017 [DOI: 10.1002 / 2016JC012458] «The [Medieval
Climate Anomaly] and [Little Ice Age] are climate anomalies that were caused by natural forcing (e.g., solar variability and volcanic emissions), but the [Current Warm Period] is linked to anthropogenic factors (e.g., industrialization and land - use changes)
Climate Anomaly] and [Little Ice Age] are
climate anomalies that were caused by natural forcing (e.g., solar variability and volcanic emissions), but the [Current Warm Period] is linked to anthropogenic factors (e.g., industrialization and land - use changes)
climate anomalies that were caused
by natural forcing (e.g., solar variability and volcanic emissions), but the [Current Warm Period] is linked to
anthropogenic factors (e.g., industrialization and land -
use changes)»
In a recent article, we call this
anthropogenic drought, which is water stress caused or intensified
by human activities, including increased demand, outdated water management,
climate change from
anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, growing energy and food production, intensive irrigation, diminished supplies, and land
use change.
Looking for any evidence that humanity is cooking the globe, Jiansong Zhou and Ka - Kit Tung (Deducing Multi-decadal
Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends
Using Multiple Regression Analysis) began
by excluding
climate change due to natural factors and more specifically,
by adding the effects of AMO (Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation) trends that alarmists neglected to consider.
But, the «Original Sin» associated with the heterogeneous mess of the surface temperature record was perpetrated
by James Hansen et el in the early 1980's when they decided to
use the surface temperature record to prove and / or justify their «junk science» claims of CO2 causing
Anthropogenic Global Warming /
Climate Change.
Although projected increases in greenhouse gas concentrations caused
by fossil fuel combustion are expected to dominate 21st century
climate change, some studies suggest that
anthropogenic land
use may yet be at least as important and may remain so in the near future (8).
Regardless of whether early land
use significantly affected global
climate, understanding the global role of land
use in determining the onset and magnitude of
anthropogenic climate change is critical for gauging the climatic impact of current and future modifications of the terrestrial biosphere, including efforts to offset fossil fuel emissions
by reducing deforestation (114).
«In the 1990's, the progressives running many of the world's western nations embarked on a path to
use the threat of dangerous
anthropogenic climate change to centralize power in their governments
by claiming the need to stabilize the concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases»
[In the 1990's, the progressives running many of the world's western nations embarked on a path to
use the threat of dangerous
anthropogenic climate change to centralize power in their governments by claiming the need to stabilize the concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases, which was codified by the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) t
climate change to centralize power in their governments by claiming the need to stabilize the concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases, which was codified by the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) tr
change to centralize power in their governments
by claiming the need to stabilize the concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases, which was codified
by the 1992 UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) t
Climate Change (UNFCCC) tr
Change (UNFCCC) treaty.]
The second paper,
by Hagos et al. (2016) in Geophysical Research Letters
uses output from a global
climate model to examine
changes to atmospheric river events over western North America, assuming large, business - as - usual
anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.
Sadly, the balance of 97 % agreement
by climate scientists re Anthropogenic Global Warming and Climate Change versus the only 55 % of agreement by the public relects the reality of getting a message across using modern
climate scientists re
Anthropogenic Global Warming and
Climate Change versus the only 55 % of agreement by the public relects the reality of getting a message across using modern
Climate Change versus the only 55 % of agreement
by the public relects the reality of getting a message across
using modern media.
may give cause for some to question the wider role of
climate change and not solely global warming, that are induced
by anthropogenic emissions,
changes in land
use, water quality etc for which there is direct empirical data in the form of images, and not in mathematical treatments of theory and simulated models.