Sentences with phrase «used by climate»

The same tactic is used by climate contrarians.

Climateaudit has focused on auditing topics related to the paleoclimate reconstructions over the past millennia (in particular the so called «hockey stick») and also the software being used by climate researchers to fix data problems due to poor quality surface weather stations in the historical climate data record.

but still used by climate researchers today — ignored boundary conditions by assuming an «infinitely thick» atmosphere.»

A recent report finds that data sets used by climate alarmists are not a valid representation of reality, including their repeated claims of highest recorded average temperatures.

Those deliverables included research papers, Soon's public appearances and presentations, a book chapter, and a report used by another climate skeptic in testimony before Congress.

This is a representative concentration pathway that represents a forcing of 8.5 watts per meter squared that is used by climate modelers to represent the worst case atmospheric effect of greenhouse gases by 2100.

I think this common sense fact has been used by climate scientist to announce: «Yes there is a pause in surface temp rise but the oceans are still warming, without adding.»

It has absolutely zero to do with anything or any data used by climate science.

If the Earth's greenhouse is caused by the forcing model used by climate scientists, then the GHE should be very stable over the course of the year because overall there is little change to the atmospheric concentration of the greenhouse gases that cause the GHE in the forcing model that they use.

Snowstorms like the one that hit the east coast of North America this weekend are sometimes used by climate sceptics to argue that global warming is a hoax.

A strategy used by climate policy proponents to counter the strategies of the merchants of doubt (Oreskes and Conway, 2010; Schneider and Flannery, 2009) has been the establishment of a broad international scientific consensus with high confidence levels, strong appeals to the authority of the consensus relative to opposing viewpoints, and exposure of the motives of skeptics.

Because if I'm not qualified, then you should not be trusting the tools, methods and calculations used by climate scientists and others to do their work, nor the results of that work... because I had a role in developing and refining some of the very fundamental tools they (and you) use!

Arguments from credible science like these can be used by the climate change deniers to bolster their non-scientific case.

The data is crucial to the famous «hockey stick graph» used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Another complaint by these skeptics was the lack of transparency and access to data used by the climate establishment.

That information is a new insight that will likely be used by the climate modeling community, including the scientists who contribute modeling expertise to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said Lazaros Oreopoulos, a cloud and radiation budget researcher at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who was not involved in the study.

I guess you're saying there shouldn't be??? Anyway, according to the version of the greenhouse effect theory used by the climate models, the greenhouse gases should be altering this natural temperature profile by changing the rates of «infrared cooling» from different altitudes.

Not to mention that Jennifer's main point is correct: temperature adjustments have on balance been improperly used by climate hypesters to support their fervent belief in a climate catastrophe.

The Oregon Petition has been used by climate change skeptics as proof that there is no scientific consensus.

Arrhenius's calculations did set the groundwork for later studies, e.g., Plass, 1956 (Open access), but compared to the infrared cooling models currently used by climate models, it was rather crude and simplistic.

But every one of them is also used by climate science deniers.

Such adjusted data has been used by climate scientists and environmental activists to claim that 2014 was the warmest year on record.

Spectral analysis, unless properly understood may lead to very misleading conclusions, here are shown four essential things one needs to be aware of all the time: On the other hand there are again unnoticeable data curiosities, this graph shows an unusual configuration within one of the top five temperature data sets used by the climate scientists in their calculations, predictions and computer models.

Representative F. James Sensenbrenner (R — WI) questions Dr. John Holdren, President Obamaâ $ ™ s Science and Technology advisor regarding ClimateGate, calling the tactics used by some climate experts as â $ œscientific fascism.â $

And once again we're using the model mean because it represents the forced component of the climate models; that is, if the forcings used by the climate models were what caused the surfaces of the oceans to warm, the model mean best represents how the ocean surfaces would warm in response to those forcings.

Download some of the code used by climate modellers.

ourphyl, I believe you have just disqualified yourself as to your ability to comment upon the question of whether the science being used by climate scientists is any good — since you also admit you are a newbie to the climate science field.

Speaking of which, the issue raised by you in the OP was whether the IPCC 1990 graphic was used by climate scientists in the period 1992 - 1995 in a way that would rebut John Mashey's claim that by 1992 it had been rejected as misrepresenting what really occurred.

It focuses on the key measure, known as equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), which is used by climate scientists to make predictions.

A study of the future global economy has concluded that the standard worst - case scenario used by climate scientists is actually not the worst case.

The Oregon Petition has been used by climate change skeptics as proof that there is no scientific consensus, however they fail to note the controversy surrounding the petition itself.

Another tactic frequently used by the climate change disinformation campaign that also constitutes reckless disregard for the truth are claims made about one controversy among the enormous body of scientific literature that supports the consensus view that assert that this controversy proves that the entire scientific basis for the consensus view has been undermined by this controversy.

The output of such model simulations is then used by the climate impacts community to investigate what potential future benefits or threats could be expected.

Together, this and other research by climate skeptics shows that the «science» used by climate alarmists is scientifically invalid since it does not satisfy the scientific method.

Part 1 provides background to the scenarios used by climate scientists.

«Sea Level Rise» is just one in a long line of propaganda metrics used by the climate crisis industry to promote the narrative that your CO2 emissions are causing unprecedented climate change.

So, whilst I agree that the issue is about regime change and not linear feedback, I am not convinced that the models used by climate scientists can not represent the actual system.

This is one of the reasons I really don't like the convention used by climate scientists.

In Australia, the most commonly used definition (and the one used by the Climate Council) is from the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM).

This reminds me of the logic used by climate change obstructionists: Because we're not certain how the climate will change or what humanity's causal role is, we should postpone response until we know better.

The techniques used by climate science «skeptics» to cast doubt are clear.

This is a problem because the general public are being grossly misinformed about what the scientific method used by Climate scientists actually entails.»

I'll try to maintain the discipline to be «caustically honest» (to steal a phrase used by a climate scientist in a story of mine on tipping points last year) in weighing the issues and opportunities confronting humanity as its astonishing 200 - years - and - counting growth spurt crests.

The volcanic events associated with these intervals caused global weather and climate phenomena and are often used by climate modelers as well to understand volcanic sulfate loading on the climate.

For more information on satellites used by climate scientists, see this 2016 infographic produced by Carbon Brief.

So when the word «denier» gets used by a climate scientist in this way, a lot of people are inferred by the reader / listener to be under this umbrella...

«The language style used by climate change skeptics suggests that the arguments put forth by these groups may be less credible in that they are relatively less focused upon the propagation of evidence and more intent on refuting the opposing perspective,» said Pennycook.

Ken Pettett writes to complain about the uncertain language used by climate scientists (19 July, p 32).

Definitions of «feedback» in use by climate scientists today are limited to Arrhenius» equations and to computer models.

Rockefeller Foundation grant for «For use by the climate community and biodiversity alliance in support of developing an agriculture standard that will help to elevate the quality of smallholder farmer - and community - led climate change mitigation and adaptation projects in developing coun»