In some parts of the world, dogs were also
used by humans as faithful partners in hunting and gathering activities.
Not exact matches
By using our own brain
as a model, this technology is able to apply
human intuition at machine speed.
McDonald's is requiring suppliers of its broiler chickens to begin phasing out the
use of antibiotics defined
by the World Health Organization
as «highest priority critically important antimicrobials» (HPCIA) to
human medicine.
The companies join gay - rights and
human rights groups
as well
as the American Civil Liberties Union in attacking the law over its broad language, which could be
used by business owners to
use religious objections to deny same - sex couples wedding.
The joint research undertaken
by the two companies will examine how blockchain, the technology at the basis of cryptocurrencies such
as Bitcoin, could be
used for developing innovative cybersecurity solutions, such
as secure transmission of information between services and supply chains, user authentication, critical devices and elements that run with no
human intervention and additional solutions for the cyber challenges in a hyper - connected world.
To manage such risks effectively, we believe companies must assess the risks to shareholder value posed
by human rights practices in their operations and supply chain,
as well
as by the
use of their products.
So,
by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we
use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class
as well
as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «
human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired
by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.
We conservatives think that nature exists to be
used well
by the
human person, just
as we think that
human nature isn't an oxymoron.
Begin with the thought that
human development appears these days driven entirely
by scientific and technological advances (knowledge)
as influencing and influenced
by economic, political, and social
uses of that knowledge (praxis).
By the time Pope Benedict XVI addressed the U.N. General Assembly on the sixtieth anniversary of the UDHR in 2008, opportunistic
uses of
human rights were in full swing, prompting the pope to announce, «Efforts need to be redoubled in the face of pressure to reinterpret the foundations of the Declaration and to compromise its inner unity so
as to facilitate a move away from the protection of
human dignity towards the satisfaction of simple interests, often particular interests.»
As a participant in that 1998 Ramsey Colloquium, a longtime supporter of the cautious use of rights language, and a frequent critic of its misuses, I was moved by Reno's arguments to ponder whether the noble post — World War II universal human - rights idea has finally been so manipulated and politicized as to justify its abandonment by men and women of good wil
As a participant in that 1998 Ramsey Colloquium, a longtime supporter of the cautious
use of rights language, and a frequent critic of its misuses, I was moved
by Reno's arguments to ponder whether the noble post — World War II universal
human - rights idea has finally been so manipulated and politicized
as to justify its abandonment by men and women of good wil
as to justify its abandonment
by men and women of good will.
By the way could the «BrainWashing» be from the
uses of those Funny Shampoos and Products which are said to contain so many bad chemicals that could lead to cancers??! Any way I thought brainwashed one's are less
human affectionate, rather acting
as Robots in many ways so better check who does appear like that...!
But the question is one that must be faced
by any process philosophy or theology which sets out to
use an analysis of
human experience
as a basis for characterizing God.
Whiteheadians seem able to imagine such ecstatically spanned unities - across - time on the so - called «microscopic» scale of the «specious present,» but give up on the idea
as the scope of the temporal disclosure space is widened to the scale of
human lifetime and of generations.7 But worse than this from the point of view of Heidegger's temporal problematic,
by submitting the ecstatic unities of their «specious presents» to the before / after ordering and metric properties of linear time, at least in terms of their mutually external relations and arrangements, they give back ontologically every advantage they gained from the
use of an cc - static - temporal disclosure horizon in the first place, even though it was only the single horizon of presence.
What about some 2,000 proteins that are
used by a
human cell
as enzymes?
I see
humans read the Bible
as if it were written originally
by modern day americans
using modern day English... one has to remember that the Bible was written from a Jewish culture of 2000 plus years ago..
For example — Often
used by many christians
as an arguement for intolerence towards
human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.
He will not require not merely that the new knowledge be
used as the foundation of the proof, but that the very spirit and atmosphere of the new knowledge enter in such a way into thedemonstration of God's existence, that the complexities and confusions of
human thought engendered
by the new knowledge shall be resolved in harmonious unity in the postulate of God's existence, nature, and relation to created being.
As yet, no one has ventured to translate Dasein or Vorhanden, but in order not to disfigure the English translation by the frequent use of German words, I have rendered Dasein as «human life», «human Being», or even «Being» where its human character is made clear by the contex
As yet, no one has ventured to translate Dasein or Vorhanden, but in order not to disfigure the English translation
by the frequent
use of German words, I have rendered Dasein
as «human life», «human Being», or even «Being» where its human character is made clear by the contex
as «
human life», «
human Being», or even «Being» where its
human character is made clear
by the context.
The believe that he is driving home is somewhat a mystery
as the
human mind anticipates
by using the internal clock to determine when or where an arrival takes place, and when Dad does arrive home, everyone is happy to greet him.
Vorhanden, which Heidegger
uses of the peculiar mode of being characteristic of inanimate objects,
as contrasted with responsible
human Dasein, I have translated
by «tangible»,
as in Bultmann the antithesis is not so much between Vorhandensein and Dasein
as between the tangible realities of the visible world and eternal realities, very much like the Pauline contrast of kata sarka and kata pneuma.
That also is why the experiences of
human life, with all its perversions and distortions, may yet be
used as a proper illustration — and it was so
used by our Lord himself — for the divine charity in its outreach to men.
This ordered dependability can be explored and
used by human wills, but
as far
as we can observe, it is not set aside upon request.
Gregory of Nyssa, (c.330 - c395), who was bishop of Nyssa, but exiled for a time
by the Arian party»
used this analogy: «We may be confronted
by many who individually share in
human nature, such
as Peter, James and John, yet the «man» in them is one.»
The story could be heard and understood
by anyone who had experienced the depth of love in a family with its dilemmas and decisions, and Jesus
uses it
as a lesson about God which is reflected in the
human situation.
Though people may describe themselves
by using terms like «gay» or «queer» which are commonly
used in today's culture,
as Christians who believe in man created in the image of God, we should ask if these cultural terms are, in fact, true ontological categories of the
human person, in accord with the blueprint of
human existence.
I tried to make this clear both in the reference to being in the expression «ontic power» and
by using the expression «fundamental entity» in the latter part of the book to refer to
human beings and other kinds of entities
as well.
Whitehead's
use of assumptions dating back to Descartes and Locke in his account of perception leaves him vulnerable to the criticisms introduced
by the revolution in philosophic method taking place at the time he was writing his major works, one in which the analysis of the functioning of language was replacing psychological introspection
as the principal method for understanding
human thought.
This opened the way to affirming the
use of coercive power
by humans as well.
Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation of nature which produced a nature devoid of spirits preparing the way for its scientific analysis and technological control and
use; b) desacralisation of society and state
by liberating them from the control of established authority and laws of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled freedom of reason and conscience of persons; it was necessary to affirm freedom and equality
as fundamental rights of all persons and to enable common action in politics and society
by adherents of all religions and none in a religiously pluralistic society; and c) an abandonment of an eternally fixed sacred order of
human society enabling ordering of secular social affairs on the basis of rational discussion.
«If the image of God and the law of God were completely obliterated from man's soul
by sin, if no «faint outlines» of the original remained, men would have no conception of justice, righteousness, or peace to
use as the foundation of the
human standards of equity.
It looks
as if one religion is trying to claim love
as its own even though loving
human beings have always existed long before any of the «gods» were ever conceived
by human beings and
used by scamming
human beings in their efforts to control others.
As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled
by numerous factors: the near - universal
human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to
use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license
by accepting no protections of unborn
human life.
A decade ago humanitarian intervention, defined
by Brian Lepard
as «the
use of military force to protect the victims of
human rights violations,» seemed...
By using the tools of historical and literary criticism, however, biblical scholars such
as Reimarus, David Strauss and Julius Wellhausen revealed the
human origin and character of the Bible.
As Bultmann uses them, the former refers to an event so far as it is significant for human existence (e.g., the cross as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raqu
As Bultmann
uses them, the former refers to an event so far
as it is significant for human existence (e.g., the cross as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raqu
as it is significant for
human existence (e.g., the cross
as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raqu
as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself
as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raqu
as judged and forgiven
by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross
as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raqu
as an incident in the annals of ancient history).»
I think that the references to hell are talking about the practice that was once
used of sacrificing
humans by burning them, and if we were evil we might suffer the same fate
as those
human sacrifices
Indeed, most cultures in
human history have generated no such marvel
as the modern scientific movement, and even in our own culture, scientifically oriented
as it is supposed to be, most people accept the benefits of technology and
use the vocabulary of science but do not in fact choose to abide
by the disciplines that alone make scientific productivity possible.
Not only must the
use of the radio spectrum,
as a technical matter, be on terms which are mutually acceptable to the members of the
human race, but through the ITU, its users contribute the knowledge of the propagation and other characteristics of the radio spectrum which is the
by - product of its
use.12.
The other estimate appears under the heading of «
use,»
by which they mean donations categorized
by type of recipient institution, such
as religion, education, health or
human services.
Adam, to suggest your SUPER inflated numbers (most were killed due to conditionso f war, including
by their own governments failure to to give two squirts of piss about them and
using then
as human shields) somehow makes my country's actions in the war on terror equivalent to terrorism itself is beyond offensive to me.
While Paul's thought is
by no means always clear, and perhaps from letter to letter not always exactly the same, it is nevertheless certain that his concept of resurrection can be clearly distinguished from that of the traditional «bodily resurrection».27 Paul does not speak in terms of the «same body» but rather in terms of a new body, whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly man», 29 «a house not made
by human hands, eternal and in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31 In
using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies
as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal
by nature.
The myth of the Last Judgment attempts,
by using the end - time
as the reference point, to proclaim a truth about
human responsibility which is not confined to any point in time, but which pervades all time.
The importance of whether they are
used destructively or creatively has been magnified a thousandfold
by what Jung referred to
as «that peculiar flower of
human ingenuity, the hydrogen bomb.»
It may seem that to emphasize the pervasive operation of the Holy Spirit,
as well
as to stress the Spirit's focal action in the life of Jesus and its consequences, will in the end reduce men and women to mere automatons
used by God with no respect for their freedom, their dignity, and their own responsible decisions, without any personal or social
human contribution to the process.
Deeply influenced
by the religious icons in churches of his home country, Greece, Platon
uses photography
as an opportunity to capture the complexities and beauties of the
human soul through each of his subjects.
A panel of nineteen experts appointed
by the National Institutes of Health has recommended government funding for conceiving
human embryos in the laboratory for the sole purpose of
using them
as materials for research.
Soft just war theory is characterized
by seven key components: a strongly articulated horror of war; a strong presumption against war; a skepticism about government claims; the
use of just war theory
as a tool for citizen discernment and prophetic critique; a pattern of trusting the efficacy of international treaties, multilateral strategies and the perspectives of global peace and
human rights groups and the international press; a quite stringent application of just war criteria; and a claim of common ground with Christian pacifists.
As the devotees give themselves to their god, using some token for their oblation such as a human life, an animal, grain, a dance or other ceremonial, so the god responds to their action by relating himself afresh to them in a helpful and enriching fashio
As the devotees give themselves to their god,
using some token for their oblation such
as a human life, an animal, grain, a dance or other ceremonial, so the god responds to their action by relating himself afresh to them in a helpful and enriching fashio
as a
human life, an animal, grain, a dance or other ceremonial, so the god responds to their action
by relating himself afresh to them in a helpful and enriching fashion.
If God is really actively engaged with and in the world, adapting the divine intention to it, taking into the divine life what occurs there, and hence seriously affected
by it quite
as much
as sustaining it creatively and working within it to accomplish an enduring purpose, then indeed God must be understood in a fashion that is most suitably symbolized
by what we know of relationship at the
human level — granted, of course, that we say this with an O altitudo, to
use Sir Thomas Browne's phrase.