The use of the term «historical» is
used by legal publishers with limited access to the early case reports.
Not exact matches
7.1 The
Publisher warrants to the Licensee that the Licensed Materials
used as contemplated
by this License do not infringe the copyright or any other proprietary or intellectual property rights of any natural or
legal person.
4.2.7 Submit articles and excerpts from the Licensed Materials when required
by law for
use in
legal proceedings provided each article or excerpt from the Licensed Materials contains a credit line noting the original appearance of the article in its appropriate journal; provided the
use is otherwise without modification to the original material; and provided such
use does not present any material from the Licensed Materials in any manner that implies that
Publisher endorses Licensee or any of the Licensee's products or services;
Simon, don't you mean «marginal» rather than «paramount» in terms of
use by the
legal profession when compared to the commercial
legal publishers competing services?
Answer: In the olden days when people
used law books made out of paper (before people started turning law books into art, and flooring and building columns),
legal publishers would update their books
by sending out a paper insert that you could stick in a pocket in the back of the book.
The global
legal publisher vLex, LLC and its Canadian partner Compass / vLex Canada are announcing today that they will support the Feb. 23 - 25 Global Legal Hackathon by offering up to 100 participants the use of Iceberg, an artificial intelligence platform for massive content projects that vLex initially developed to facilitate its own publishing of legal materials and then began -LSB
legal publisher vLex, LLC and its Canadian partner Compass / vLex Canada are announcing today that they will support the Feb. 23 - 25 Global
Legal Hackathon by offering up to 100 participants the use of Iceberg, an artificial intelligence platform for massive content projects that vLex initially developed to facilitate its own publishing of legal materials and then began -LSB
Legal Hackathon
by offering up to 100 participants the
use of Iceberg, an artificial intelligence platform for massive content projects that vLex initially developed to facilitate its own publishing of
legal materials and then began -LSB
legal materials and then began -LSB-...]
In this video,
Legal Week
publisher John Malpas talks to Chris McKenzie, head of trusts and estate planning at BVI law firm O'Neal Webster, about the
use of trusts and other techniques to deal with the disruption that can be caused
by the death or incapacity of shareholders and directors of a private company.
Since 1999, the Award has been given
by the Association every year to acknowledge the work that is done
by publishers to provide the Canadian
legal profession with high quality materials for
use in understanding and researching the law.
It suggests that the fair
use defense is being ignored
by Ms. Rowling and Warner Brothers, and that
publishers are just saying no to what would otherwise be an entirely
legal response to one of the major literary phenomenon of the age, and one that could only foster an interest not only in this literary work, but the value and pleasure of scholarly inquiry.
By a «self - help legal software publisher», I mean web - based legal software used directly by consumers to resolve a legal problem or a legal issue through automated legal document assembly applications, expert system applications, decision - tools, intelligent databases, smart calculators, and other software applications that manipulate legal sources and legal information to generate a legal solution for a user from facts provided by the use
By a «self - help
legal software
publisher», I mean web - based
legal software
used directly
by consumers to resolve a legal problem or a legal issue through automated legal document assembly applications, expert system applications, decision - tools, intelligent databases, smart calculators, and other software applications that manipulate legal sources and legal information to generate a legal solution for a user from facts provided by the use
by consumers to resolve a
legal problem or a
legal issue through automated
legal document assembly applications, expert system applications, decision - tools, intelligent databases, smart calculators, and other software applications that manipulate
legal sources and
legal information to generate a
legal solution for a user from facts provided
by the use
by the user.
The word «comprehensive» came into
use to describe incomplete databases in the strongest possible terms, creating the impression of completeness, while leaving an «out» for the
legal publisher when omissions were identified
by users.
We even have situations where the largest
legal publishers sponsor and promote «
legal marketing» programs put on
by recent law grads whose only claim to fame is that they have not been able to get a job and that they have been able to game Twitter with software so as to generate untold thousands of Twitter followers — like that is any measure that you have a clue on to advise law firms how to
use the Internet to build and nurture relationships.
In Waldman, these materials had been taken from court records and included in a pay - per -
use database
by a
legal publisher.
The
legal publisher also was branching out into making more
use of the data it had collected over many years
by employing better technology.
The decision to
use the period in the first instance was an arbitrary one, made
by commercial
legal publishers seeking to brand their key products in the
legal marketplace.
According to a press release issued
by Access Copyright, «Canadian creators and educational
publishers have won a six - year
legal battle to receive reasonable compensation for the reproduction of copyright - protected teaching materials
used in the classroom».
The evidence for this is the need for law students to be trained in its correct
use, and
by the seemingly endless errors
by authors and
by judges in its
use that
legal publishers spend time and money to correct.
Its short statement that «An official
publisher of
legal material in an electronic record that must be preserved under Section 7 shall ensure that the material is reasonably available for
use by the public on a permanent basis» does not mandate free access and leaves too much leeway to remove material under «reasonable» conditions.
Legal citation could be simplified if Carswell Thomson were to follow the recommendation of its own publication, the McGill Guide («Canadian Guide to
Legal Citation»), and become the first
publisher create an official citation that drops the
use of periods, i.e.,
by simply announcing that the new series is «to be cited as CRCC».