I think that 99 % of the times the word «saved» (and derivatives) are
used in Scripture, it has nothing to do with «escaping hell so you can go to heaven when you die.»
The way «justify» is used today is not the way it is
used in Scripture, and there is even a HUGE debate about how it was
used in Scripture....
It is introduced by the following preamble: «The word heart is
used in Scripture as the seat of life or strength; hence it means mind, soul, spirit, or one's entire emotional nature and understanding...» The word «thought» does have about 110 entries but close inspection reveals that these are «thoughts of the heart».
Church actually means something closer to «gathering» and the way it is
used in Scripture, it refers to the spiritual gathering of people by God into his Family.
In view of the importance of the analogy of marriage as
used in the scripture it is noteworthy that Luther uses it freely:
But another prominent way it can be
used in Scripture is with the meaning of «to be turned» as in «to be turned from their ways» or to become something new.
However, «aion» as
used in Scripture is not translated consistently — nor are the Greek words translated as «hell».
But the compound word for «helper» here — ezer kenegdo — suggests a sort of military ally, or a partner in a difficult task, and is most often
used in Scripture to describe God, who is not generally regarded by patriarchalists as a subordinate.)
Regarding witnessing with the law, most of the time the law is
used in Scripture by Jesus, it is directed toward the religious elites who thought they were keeping the law, not with the masses.
It is a word
used in Scripture, but different people mean different things by it.
The basic answer is that in my view, nearly every time the word apolia is
used in Scripture, it is in reference to believers (Matt 7:13; Rom 9:22; Php 1:28; 1 Tim 6:9; Heb 10:39).
* what other names are
used in the Scriptures for those who aren't connected to God?
Not exact matches
«Desire is part of our design» «We are destined for eternal ecstasy» «Sexual union is the main icon
scripture uses to explain what heaven has
in store for us»
I still have many
scriptures that I can't read because of the way they have been
used in the past.
Ignatius and Polycarp never regarded the entire book as «
Scripture» — they simply never
used it
in their writings.
It's not that I don't feel like I can, I can... but is that
in the vocabulary of the one who I worship, if it's not then why would I as His Son want to take on what is not His, my Father's nature... The versions of the Bible I've read seem to think that words are powerful and speaking them is an action and can even change physics if
used properly... Again, the
scriptures speak for themselves and circumventing the topical study with christiany cliche come - backs doesn't answer or annul anything that the Word has to say on the matter.
No matter what, if Jesus was going to
use scripture in anything he said, he'd better have a good reason to
use them.
So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we
use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse
in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing
in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or
scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to
in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart
in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.
The term translated to as with means bed every other time it's
used in Leviticus and when Paul referred to that
scripture when writing the clobber passage
in Corinthians he rewrote bed.
Stephen Despite having the Jewish
scriptures to
use as a guide
in creating Jesus's story, the Gospel writers could not invent him building the Third Temple (Ezekiel 37:26 - 28), gathering all Jews back to the Land of Israel (Isaiah 43:5 - 6), ushering
in an era of world peace, and end all hatred, oppression, suffering and disease (Isaiah 2:4), or spread universal knowledge of the God of Israel, which will unite humanity as one (Zechariah 14:9).
The Reformers vigorously protested what they viewed as deviations from biblical teaching, but they never
used Scripture to undermine the Trinitarian and Christological consensus of the early Church embodied
in the historic creeds that had come down from patristic times.
But I can assure you that this man does not
use any
scripture in his analysis.
Vilifying hard working Christians for their success is
in itself unchristian — particularly when many pay more than 25 % of their production
in taxes — as is
using the
scripture to advance one's personal agenda.
It's a cherry - picking of
scripture used to address what's happening right now
in popular culture,» says Knust, author of the recent book «Unprotected Texts: The Bible's Surprising Contradictions on Sex and Desire.»
If you're going to
use Leviticus are you going to follow all the things listed
in that
scriptures?
Some dance around it and are condescending
using nice words... Some can only speak
in scripture and some are just down right mean and nasty about it....
Secondly, as a priest ordained
in Rome where he knows that the Basilica would be totally against his assertion, he
uses euphemisms to cloud the mind of a reader thinking quoting wrong
scriptures with the intent to seduce would suffice — his own roots denounce his deeds and / or beliefs but he axiomatically wants to hold both the roots and wings to no avail, read the book and the truth shall set you free... This is exactly what happens when a gay priest turned professor what to justify his perverted lifestyle... I rest my case
using your words and
scriptures to save me also saves Dr. Gosnel, that monster has to just truly acknowledge and accept Jesus Christ as his lord and savior and he will be saved, forgiven, and
in heaven no matter much innocent blood he has shed.
Scripture is debated largely because of the cultural bridge we must cross
in order to understand the intention behind the stories told, the poetry
used, and the rules described.
They arrange the elements of Christian faith differently and, as a result,
use and understand the nature and purpose of the
Scripture in significantly differing ways.
They are rarely
used, and most people groan when you get to the genealogies of
Scripture in their Bible reading, but they are often some of the passages
in the Bible which help defend it from the frequent attacks that are leveled against the Bible by it's critics.
There are clearly things to contest
in Thompson's views about
Scripture here» but his
use of
Scripture in communion with the tradition will be a model for all those who understand the importance of his struggle.
We have been
using at church for the past few years as it has been
in development and I have been really happy with how it pursues the truth of
scripture, while updating language
in a great way.
If we understand the context of what was being said
in verses, chapters, books of the bible and
use scripture or show
scripture in the same light, is that Cherry - Picking?
In terms of the Scriptures you used, were they foundational in the script or were they added or improvised later in productio
In terms of the
Scriptures you
used, were they foundational
in the script or were they added or improvised later in productio
in the script or were they added or improvised later
in productio
in production?
olethros) is
used three other times
in Scripture (1 Thess 5:3; 2 Thess 1:9; 1 Tim 6:9) and refers to physical death as a result of sin.
Liberal Protestants
in the last two centuries also claimed to
use Scripture as their sole norm, and over time came to distinguish revelation from the words of the Bible.
Much of the distinctive way
in which the Wesleyan tradition
uses Scripture is wrapped up
in theological context and method.
Throughout the Bible, Lucifer lies
using Scripture out of context just like
in your comment.
Because of this ambiguity we need to give some attention to the question of
in what sense the Wesleyan way of
using Scripture in theology represents an «evangelical option.»
There is therefore a sound basis for the
use of the allegorical method
in interpreting the
Scriptures.
It's refreshing to read through Bessey's spiritual and theological narrative peppered with thoughtful and insightful reflections on interpreting Paul's biblical stance on women, and a beautiful litany of women
in scripture and world history whom God has equipped and
used to further God's purposes
in the world.
Neither option is likely, since this sort of basic grammatical mistake is not found elsewhere
in Scripture, nor is there any example of this «exception to the rule» being
used elsewhere.
We
used to sing it and jump around and wave our hands because it was a song about the passage of
Scripture when David dances wildly before the Lord and his wife shames him for it but he retorts that he'll become even more undignified
in his worship.
Personally, I think that the context includes not only where
in Scripture the passages are from (including rhetorical function, narrative position, etc.) and the historical - cultural background, but also the context of the person
using the quote.
When Noll speaks of Equiano's «immersion»
in Scripture, he is not
using that metaphor casually, as an extract from the Narrative makes clear with its «fusillade of scriptural quotations and allusions.»
And extra kudos for
using the chiastic structure of
scripture in your explanation!
Using the model above of the three - point relationship between God and Satan
in scripture, we can now identify who «Satan» is
in Job.
He also gives a high priority to the
use of
Scripture and
in the manner of St. Teresa encourages reflective reading to guide and direct wayward thoughts.
On the other hand, it gave a basic signpost on the way: the great truths taught
in scripture are indeed the way of salvation, and those entrusted with the teaching office
in the church have no right to
use that office to teach anything else.»