Sentences with phrase «used in child custody»

Learn how the Collaborative Family Law model can be used in your child custody case.

Nancy D. Polikoff, Why Are Mothers Losing: A Brief Analysis of Criteria Used in Child Custody Determinations, 7 Women's Rts.

See Nancy D. Polikoff, Why Are Mothers Losing: A Brief Analysis of Criteria Used in Child Custody Determinations, 7 Women's Rts.

Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) is a term used in child custody cases to describe one parent's manipulation of a child to harm the other parent.

Even videos that are not sexually explicit, such as clips that may seem silly or harmless at the time, can be used in child custody matters after they are posted on such platforms as Facebook and Instagram, Heft says.

Click here for my thoughts on factors that should be used in a child custody decision.

It is widely known that DNA testing is used in child custody cases for determining parenthood, in forensics, in medicine, Genetic Ancestry Testing and more.

Learn how the Collaborative Family Law model can be used in your child custody case.

The best interest of the child standard is used in child custody cases.

Additionally, child support may be determined in the same hearing or a child support hearing may rely on information used in the child custody hearing.

Are you frustrated with trying to understand the legal jargon used in your child custody case?

Not exact matches

I suppose that if your neighbour beats up his wife or molests his child then you could also do the same using your examples and in your view it would be no reason for your child to be removed from your custody.

I am very dedicated to attachment parenting and know the benefits to co-sleeping with my child but my ex-husband feels differently and is using it against me in our custody case.

They fight over who is going to have custody, they use the kids as weapons in a war of words, and they do their best to poison their children's minds against the other parent.

Whether you're planning to use a lawyer or file pro se (which means representing yourself), you'll want to first learn everything you can about the child custody laws in Georgia.

In the state of Tennessee, family courts use several factors to determine child custody cases.

Using your interview with the evaluator to recount your ex's poor choices and insensitivity in relation to your marriage will not help you gain custody of your child / ren.

Therefore, in a joint custody arrangement, it is important to present a unified front with children as it will not be good for a child to believe he / she can use one parent against the other.

South Dakota uses several criteria to determine child custody, a list of factors determined to help identify what type of custody arrangement is in the child's best interests.

Breech Twins and higher order multiples Previous CS Pre-Eclampsia Placenta praevia Cervical incompetence Previous late stillbirth Previous premature birth Grand multiparty Age under 18 Age over 35 Smoking Drug use Severe mental health issue Epilepsy Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Gestational diabetes Asthma GBS positive Abnormal antibodies Transplant recipient Congenital heart disease Known foetal abnormality Immunosuppressive medication MS Physical disability Intellectual disability Hypothyroidism Hyperthyroidism Previous shoulder dystocia Previous 3rd or 4th degree tear Sickle Cell anaemia BMI under 18 or over 35 at conception Previous massive PPH APH in current pregnancy HIV / AIDS Hepatitis B or C Active TB IUGR Oligohydramnios Polyhydramnios Child previously removed from custody because of abuse Uterine abnormalities such as uterine septum or double uterus Previous uterine surgery for fibroids Chronic renal problems Hypertension Auto immune condition Previous stroke or blod clot Cancer Domestic violence or abusive home Prisoners Homeless women

(borrowed from Dr Kitty) Breech Twins and higher order multiples Previous CS Pre-Eclampsia Placenta praevia Cervical incompetence Previous late stillbirth Previous premature birth Grand multiparty Age under 18 Age over 35 Smoking Drug use Severe mental health issue Epilepsy Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Gestational diabetes Asthma GBS positive Abnormal antibodies Transplant recipient Congenital heart disease Known foetal abnormality Immunosuppressive medication MS Physical disability Intellectual disability Hypothyroidism Hyperthyroidism Previous shoulder dystocia Previous 3rd or 4th degree tear Sickle Cell anaemia BMI under 18 or over 35 at conception Previous massive PPH APH in current pregnancy HIV / AIDS Hepatitis B or C Active TB IUGR Oligohydramnios Polyhydramnios Child previously removed from custody because of abuse Uterine abnormalities such as uterine septum or double uterus Previous uterine surgery for fibroids Chronic renal problems Hypertension Auto immune condition Previous stroke or blod clot Cancer Domestic violence or abusive home Prisoners Homeless women

Following these deaths the government promised «lessons will be learned» and overhauled the rules so that «good order and discipline» was no longer a justification for using restraint on children in custody.

The Howard League for Penal Reform published an independent review of the use of restraint on children in custody conducted by Lord Carlile QC.

Assemblyman Andrew Goodell questioned whether it was appropriate that certification to use medical marijuana be prohibit from usage as evidence in child custody hearings.

im a 49 yr old man divorced / i only have one child a daughter 16 yrs old i have sole custody of her so she lives with me / i have been single now for a few yrs and im drama free / i do not tolerate lies cheating or being used or played / im honest no matter what its abt and i expect the same in ret...

That may not be a bad thing if you have custody of one or more children and lived apart from your spouse during the last six months of the tax year, in which case you can use the advantageous Head of Household filing status.

As used in this paragraph, a «Covered Borrower» means any person who, at the time such person becomes obligated on a loan transaction or establishes an account for consumer credit, satisfies the requirements under any one or more of the following classifications, or is otherwise under applicable laws deemed to be a «Covered Borrower» under the Military Lending Act, 10 U.S. Code Section 987: (a) An active duty member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force or Coast Guard, or a person serving on active Guard and Reserve duty (a person described in this clause (a) of the definition of «Covered Borrower» is hereinafter referred to as a «Service Member»); or (b) Any of the following persons, relative to a Service Member: (1) The spouse; (2) A child under the age of 21; or (3) If dependent on the Service Member for more than one half of such person's support, any one or more of the following persons: (i) A child under the age of 23 enrolled in a full time course of study at an institution of higher learning; (ii) A child of any age incapable of self support due to a mental or physical incapacity that occurred before attaining age 23 while such person was dependent on the Service Member; (iii) Any unmarried person placed in legal custody of the Service Member who resides with such Service Member unless separated by military service or to receive institutional care or under other circumstances covered by Regulation; or (iv) A parent or parent - in - law residing in the Service Member's household.

While the judge didn't deny custody there was an order imposed that «the father shall not use drugs in the presence of the child».

Restraining orders in Arizona should not be used to resolve child custody or parenting time disputes.

How and what evidence taken from social media and digital communications can be used in a divorce or child custody / support proceeding

NJ Rev Stat § 9:6 - 1 may be the source of the rumor (since it was in the news), but that law prohibits «the habitual use by the parent or by a person having the custody and control of a child, in the hearing of such child, of profane, indecent or obscene language».

These two sets of calculations were used to arrive at the weekly child support amount in shared custody situations (when each parent takes care of the children at least 1/3 of the time):

Likewise, the term «best interests of the child», which is a test used in connection with determining matters such as which parent should have custody, now specifically incorporates elements such as the child's emotional health and well - being, and consideration of his or views if appropriate.

We encourage the use of the Collaborative Family Law model in divorce, child custody, child support, alimony, post-judgment, prenuptial, and most other family law cases.

Apply now using our online intake form and an attorney will contact you to discuss how we can assist you in your child custody or parenting time case.

Although a significant majority of all respondents were in favour of amending the Divorce Act to change the language used to describe the post-separation care of children from «custody» and «access» to alternative terminology such as «parental responsibilities» and «parenting time,» a slightly larger proportion of respondents from Alberta supported the proposed amendment than respondents from the rest of Canada.

What we learn from this case is that, while a trial court can use information provided by an expert witness as evidence as to what may be in a child's best interest, it must still independently make the decision regarding what custody arrangements are in the child's best interest after providing both parents an opportunity to present evidence at a trial.

Concept used by 20th century courts when deciding child custody cases in favor of mothers.

Battling parents may be able to use the tools provided by family law in Canada to iron contentious issues when it comes to child custody.

The state of Oregon has numerous child custody laws that are used to help determine what is in the best interest of the child in each situation.

In recent years, many professionals in the field, including lawyers and judges, are moving away from the traditional labels of custody and access and using terms such as «decision making» and «children's residency schedule» or «parenting time.&raquIn recent years, many professionals in the field, including lawyers and judges, are moving away from the traditional labels of custody and access and using terms such as «decision making» and «children's residency schedule» or «parenting time.&raquin the field, including lawyers and judges, are moving away from the traditional labels of custody and access and using terms such as «decision making» and «children's residency schedule» or «parenting time.»

To use our service there must be no disputes with your spouse about - the children (custody, access and support)- spousal support - division of property If some of these matters are still in dispute you need to get them settled one way or another before using our service (we recommend using mediation).

Rather than engaging in adversarial litigation and ultimately letting a judge decide issues of child custody, child and spousal support, and property division, parties can use mediation to reach agreements on these significant and emotional issues.

In Massachusetts, courts use several criteria to establish custody of children born out of wedlock; custody can be awarded to the mother, the father or to both parents together.

In child custody cases, New York law requires judges to use the «best interests of the child» standard.

While contested divorce, child custody disputes and other family law problems will never be pleasant, we can use our experience, compassion and steadfast advocacy to help you get moving in a positive direction.

In a traditional divorce, Psychologists are used as expert witnesses to perform Custody Evaluations and then provide a written report or testify in court regarding their recommendation about the best custodial arrangement for the childreIn a traditional divorce, Psychologists are used as expert witnesses to perform Custody Evaluations and then provide a written report or testify in court regarding their recommendation about the best custodial arrangement for the childrein court regarding their recommendation about the best custodial arrangement for the children.

Many custody cases are complex, and Michael most often recommends the use of clinicians in evaluating the best interests of the children in the family.

This means that the ways in which Family Court judges arrive at their decisions in child custody cases are dramatically different from the processes used in criminal or civil trials.

Lawyers who are trained to deal with child custody issues should not only know how to use the court system, they should be able to identify many options and help the children's parents to choose the path that is right for their families in their circumstances.