Sentences with phrase «used it against anyone»

«He would have used it against anyone in order to discombobulate him.»

One of the many tactics that are used against anyone who does not support Blockstream and the bitcoin developers who work for them is that you will be targeted in a smear campaign.

Someone on here about 6 month ago said about people living abroad don't understand and haven't got a clue in supporting arsenal if they don't live in London even tho I live in London I was one of the first to say that if you got red and white In Your blood were all equal so don't come with that sh # t that I'm acting like in more of a supporter then anyone else even if they do support arsenal from the moon cause were all equal at the end of the day and I wi never use That against anyone but arsenal stays in your blood all your life you fool so I can treat it like my family I've even been beaten up cause of arsenal and in life you will fight for your family and friends even you you muppet I will fight for you cause you a gooner it's nothing to do about wenger

Getting back on topic, the post above is simply an example of the McCarthyist - style of ad - homs used against anyone who deviates from the concensus.

Not exact matches

Tesla will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology.

If we consider how increasingly weaponized ad targeting has become, especially since this past summer when Google and Facebook consolidated our browsing histories into their user IDs, and we think about how anybody in the world could target anyone else in the United States with surgical precision by their susceptibilities and propensities, maybe this election was similar to a 9/11 moment, but non-violent and invisible, where we realize that our commercial infrastructure was used against us, and we don't realize it until after the catastrophe?

And then there are just people who are worried that the government might use their census data to cross-reference it against other information they've given the government (income being the obvious example - anyone know someone who plays fast and lose with their taxes?).

I don't think anyone would claim that specific groups can't have their own Facebook - like web site, but this particular site is perpetuating a gender segregation philosophy / ideology that many find abhorrent and readily use their free speech rights to argue against.

The sort of thing I would have thought that no one would really want to argue against in this day and age, yet here you are, calling me a «fear - monger» and talking like I was against anyone using their life experiences to make decisions.

They are members of a nationwide group known as The Initiative Collective — a volunteer crime prevention outfit that encourages people to fight back against violence using self - defense, armor and theatrics — in addition to doing general good deeds like fundraising, feeding the homeless and offering free martial arts training to anyone who wants it.

In contrast Jesus took away the power and riches motivation as he spoke against hierarchical leadership withing the community he is building, against giving titles to anyone, and against using the place were people gather together for monetary gain.

The word was actually first used as an insult against anyone in conflict with the established religion.

We believe that it is our free speech right not to participate with anyone who uses hateful or hurtful language against a community that is already under attack.

Again, anyone who supports Iran, Turkey, Syria or Pakistan's use of Islamic laws against non-Muslums in this country can leave now, and don't let the good lady holding the torch of freedom kick you on your way out the doors of freedom.

I don't see how anyone could object very strenuously to this, provided (as Nussbaum does provide) that «rules and formal decision procedures, including procedures inspired by economics,» are not supplanted but rather supplemented and corrected by the emotional knowledge provided in literature; and provided also that we caution ourselves against using emotional affect frivolously and sentimentally.

Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.»

I applaud a company that was built on religious ideas, if they do not discriminate or use company profits to discriminate against anyone.

So to reprimand anyone for commending Buddhist humanism is definitly not loving thy neighbor, but you are sinning by using harsh words against those who are trying to love their brothers.

Not sure if anyone of the them is going to be used in tomorrow's game but certainly against Burnley..

If it offends anyone, me using REAL language against Walcott, then that offence is NOTHING when compared to the offence this bone idle, lazy shirker has given to Arsenals REAL fans over many years past.

The irreversible damage that comes from a conviction by plea bargain is that it creates an admissible public record of guilt for assault for use in any and every civil lawsuit that anyone files against him related to this incident.

There was a time when I used to beat my head against d wall wen I saw us matched up against top teams in the knockout competitions but now I look upto them with excitement because I believe we can beat anyone and also to be the best u need to beat the best.

Sweat was used on the line against FSU because he is a plus run - stopper and FSU didn't have anyone better.

Their arguments against the use of chlorine - bleached products are so convincing that one is astonished that the manufacturers keep putting them on the market, that governments continue to permit it, and that anyone in - their right mind would now use such products.

Notably, in 2010, the ACLU testified against «the use of terror watch lists to screen gun purchases,» writing that the «deeply flawed» terror watch list process led the group to conclude, «Given these problems, we do not believe that anyone should be deprived of the right to purchase a gun, or the right to fly, or any other benefit of membership in civil society based solely on placement on a terror watch list.»

Especially for Trump Vs. Syria, you're hitting two birds with one stone: (a) you appease generally - anti-Shia-axis right wing hawks - especially as this also plays against Iran; (b) you appease anyone who doesn't like chemical weapons used against civilians across the spectrum on humanitarian angle.

Anyone who uses this information to commit a criminal act against another person is subject to criminal prosecution under New York State law.

«For Mr. Paladino, I'm going to call his name, to use such hateful language against anyone is a detriment to our community and as an elected official he should know better,» Grant said.

Initially it was used by fringe sections of the internet right to mock socially progressive liberals, and then pretty much anyone who was against Trump.

This idea that anyone who stands against Labour must therefore be pro-Tory uses such obviously false logic that it is almost embarrassing to hear it and yet it is an argument you hear Labour using time and time again.

Then he started releasing a slew of vicious campaign ads and rained direct mail pieces on district voters, charging his opponent with using her constituent mailers as a means of campaigning and charging her with voting against student loans for anyone but illegal immigrants.

So instead of protecting its intellectual property, Tesla has pledged that it «will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology».

However, the methods used by the RSSB study team were recently proved to be systematically biased against anyone wanting more to be spent against deaths in large accidents, and so they should not have been used.

These scenarios assumed that Zika transmission would not decrease during the winter months, that preventive measures to protect against mosquito bites would not be taken, that anyone who was infected with Zika would have symptoms when they returned to their home countries, that people who were infected would return home immediately and that the home countries would not use precautions to prevent mosquito bites in their home countries.

Anyone who has watched a nature documentary has seen insects that camouflage themselves as sticks, protecting the insects against predators that use vision to hunt for prey.

It helped them improve the athletes» workout abilities and gain more muscle, although in today's age anyone can use it to improve fitness and fight against aging.

I have nothing against belts or wraps, but I have never seen anyone use a pad during competition.

You agree to defend, indemnify and hold Company harmless from and against all third party claims, damages and expenses (including reasonable attorneys» fees) against or incurred by Company arising out of your breach of these Terms of Use or violation of applicable law, your use or access of the Site, or access by anyone accessing the Site using your user ID and passwoUse or violation of applicable law, your use or access of the Site, or access by anyone accessing the Site using your user ID and passwouse or access of the Site, or access by anyone accessing the Site using your user ID and password.

You must notify us immediately if anyone makes or threatens to make any claim against you relating to your use of this site.

A man grabs his girlfriend and uses her as a human shield against gunfire, which does not hit anyone.

The perpetually transformative actor Jake Gyllenhaal does a 180 - degree turn from his previous role of Louis Bloom in Nightcrawler, going from playing a spindly man who used his sharp intellect and lack of emotion to gain the upper hand to get ahead, to beefy one that is of below average intelligence, running all on emotion, and lashing out physically against anyone and anything that gets in his way.

I have mapped this against OCR GCSE Computer Science - though anyone teaching these topics will be able to use this resource as there's no mention of OCR specifically.

Anyone considering the next generation of displays for use in classrooms should take extra precautions in understanding these pointers and accounting for them against their school's needs and budgetary expectations.

It was all there for anyone to use against you.»

We're not against such additions per se, but since there's no way to synchronise these with any other service (Outlook, Google etc) or device, it's hard to see anyone using them seriously.

Anyone who uses a credit report or another type of consumer report to deny your application for credit, insurance, or employment - or to take another adverse action against you - must tell you, and must give you the name, address, and phone number of the agency that provided the information.

This mechanism of sharing information and pooling them into one source is pretty common among financial sites though, so the best anyone can do is weigh their comfort level with regards to handing over their personal information against the advantages and benefits of using free accounts.

Anyone who uses information from a CRA to take action against you — such as denying an application for credit, insurance, or employment — must tell you, and give you the name, address, and phone number of the CRA that provided the consumer report, plus disclose your right to a free report after denial.

Subject to this, anyone can make a claim in the small claims courts, although the airline you claim against could challenge whether or not you can use the court you want to use — it's up to the court you apply to to decide.

I wonder if anyone has thoughts about using forex to put up a crude hedge against currency risk for a fairly low cost.