Once we have
used real observations to understand the probability in the historical record, then we can use climate models to compare the probability in the current climate (in which global warming has occurred) with a climate in which there was no human - caused global warming.
Not exact matches
His
observations prompted insights such as building the graphical user interface to look just like its
real - world counterpart (a checkbook, for example), making it easy for people to
use it.
Because believers want god to be
real, they
use selective
observation, make excuses and hold onto expectations that are very, very unlikely — Jesus has been dead for 2000 + years.
While students are out exploring, they have opportunities to
use scientific tools, make
observations, and experience
real science in the field.
Use their skills of
observation and their stomach to experiment like a
real food scientist.
The method
uses a combination of manual
observation and non-intrusive tracking sensors that allow researchers to track nurses in
real time.
Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the
real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match
observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land
use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.
These include
using the same model
used to detect the planet instead to fit synthetic, planet - free data (with realistic covariance properties, and time sampling identical to the
real data), and checking whether the «planet» is still detected; comparing the strength of the planetary signal with similar Keplerian signals injected into the original
observations; performing Bayesian model comparisons between planet and no - planet models; and checking how robust the planetary signal is to datapoints being removed from the
observations.
There are a lot of technical
observations — pointing out
real penguins vs. CGI, different types of fake snow, discussing the digital video cameras
used, recalling filming weather conditions and times — that most viewers won't care to hear about, at least not for 94 minutes.
Initial primary
observation lessons
use real tulips to draw from, though this could be adapted to work from secondary imagery.
CEL coaches helped ITL2s plan this type of professional development for the teachers on their caseload: teaching lessons side by side, providing
observations with immediate feedback,
using real student data to assess growth.
Participants will learn how to capture
real time walkthrough data and provide immediate results to teachers
using web - based
observation.
Students will
use observation, critical thinking, and simple tests to solve a variety of crimes
using real scientific methods.
By measuring teacher practice, student experience, and change over time
using our survey and
observation data, we'll be able to identify better indicators of personalization in a classroom — increased student agency, for example, or increased utilization of student data to tailor instruction in
real time.
Teachers might also collaborate to plan, teach, and observe lessons,
using lesson study or
observation inquiry.2 Analyzing
real - time conversations through the lesson study process helps teachers plan and test new approaches for improving student dialogue and collaboration.
You can also
use the Qualitative Research Method, which is associated with narrative descriptions that deal with
observation, interviews, life or personal histories, case studies,
real life situations and conversational analysis.
Often isolating the dolls and photographing them situated in tiny, austere settings, Simmons
uses fictional scenes to make
observations about
real life.
Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the
real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match
observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land
use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.
From the («lay - scientist»,
real scientist wanna - be) guy who you Honored by re-enforcing my — much decried by the other bloggers —
observation that, by
using SO2 to «Geoengineer» our way out of having to
use Good Sense to solve our Most Pressing of Planetary Issues, would only lead to more Acid Rain, Ocean Acidification, and — ultimately, or so I conjectured — the loss of our Primary source of the Oxygen that we all need to Breathe — Phytoplankton; I must say that I TRULY APPRECIATE what you do!
Instead, we have a very good idea of what GHGs do to radiation, we have a reasonable idea of what aerosols and land
use changes do, and we can look for fingerprints in the
real world
observations that match what we expect to have happened.
To come to their findings, the authors
used a mixture of paleoclimate records, computer models, and
observations of current rates of sea level rise, but «the
real world is moving somewhat faster than the model,» Hansen says.
The dataset is kept current
using near
real - time
observations.
Considering the large natural variability and relatively small forcing present in the
real world, as compared to the forcing imposed by doubling CO2 concentrations in the simulations, this implies that
using observations to constrain the cloud feedback is a challenging task and requires reliable long - term measurements.»
If you really want to know what is going on with the global average IR radiation field and you or your experts have some knowledge of quantitative IR radiative transfer, you (or the others) may compute precisely this physical quantity
using only first principles and
real observations.
As others have noted, the IPCC Team has gone absolutely feral about Salby's research and the most recent paper by Dr Roy Spencer, at the University of Alabama (On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth's Radiant Energy Balance), for one simple reason: both are based on empirical, undoctored satellite
observations, which, depending on the measure required, now extend into the past by up to 32 years, i.e. long enough to begin evaluating
real climate trends; whereas much of the Team's science in AR4 (2007) is based on primitive climate models generated from primitive and potentially unreliable land measurements and proxies, which have been «filtered» to achieve certain artificial realities (There are other more scathing descriptions of this process I won't
use).
However if you go deeper and notice that each model
uses constant coefficients that are fitted to the
observations, then you may ask what is the mechanism that makes these coefficients to be what they seem to be or whether they even are constant in the
real world.
So the
real question here is will the
use of regional climate projections improve decisions made when compared to the
use of historical climate
observations?
Satellite data providers in Member States can contact us to obtain
real - time and archive products for
use in their operational forecast system in exchange for
real - time satellite
observations.
While one may applaud Popper's conviction that
real argument is preferable to the kind of suggestive
observations that Wittgenstein and his followers
used to throw out, Popper himself has debased the currency of argument by his indiscriminate employment of any argument that comes to hand.
But almost universally, when they try to explain it, they all
use the purely radiative approach, which is incorrect, misleading, contrary to
observation, and results in a variety of inconsistencies when people try to plug
real atmospheric physics into a bad model
Spencer and Braswell freely admit that
using their simple model is just the first step in a complicated diagnosis, but also point out that the results from simple models provide insight that should help guide the development of more complex models, and ultimately could help unravel some of the mystery as to why full climate models produce high estimates of the earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity, while estimates based in
real - world
observations are much lower.
Every time the models have been adjusted
using guesswork (or informed judgement as some would say) to bring them back into line with ongoing
real world
observations a new divergence between model expectations and
real world events has begun to develop.
He is
using real world
observations, not models whose assumptions are likely wrong.
Every time the models have been adjusted
using guesswork (or informed judgment as some would say) to bring them back into line with ongoing
real world
observations a new divergence between model expectations and
real world events has begun to develop.