Found lots of good stuff, but in particular were the McNamara Report (Oct 1966) and the senate records etc showing we first
used weather modification as a weapon of war in 1968.
The public's consciousness is being systematically filled with awareness of this dreadful situation AND YET, WHY DO WE NOT HEAR MORE OUTCRY FOR
USING WEATHER MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES TO CREATE RAIN IN CALIFORNIA??? Is it because the public generally just accepts the inevitability of this apparently «natural» drought?
Not exact matches
Atmocean bowed out of the
weather modification business in 2007 and has since pivoted toward
using wave energy to drive desalination and onshore aquaculture.
The insight from
weather modification's old guard — that tiny changes can engender profound atmospheric shifts — has been embraced by more recent, cutting - edge investigators, those conceiving
weather - changing satellites and
using physics theories to invent a climate of choice.
If we just make tiny
modifications to existing conditions, little touches here and there, the changes then cascade upward
using the existing
weather's natural actions, and that's what gets the biggest results.»
After there is scientific proof that a
weather modification technique is both safe and effective, then that technique may be
used in operational programs.
The worldwide
weather modification assault has been
used to confuse and divide populations in regard to the true state of the climate and the true extent of the threat that we collectively face.
Further, this facility is not designed,
used, or capable of any larce scale
weather modification.
I can't help but wonder if
weather modification is being
used as another method of culling the population.
So, if for example rain in a region is being increased or reduced artificially by a corporation like
Weather Modification, Inc., or one of the many others, and those records are then
used in the models for future climate data, how can that data be accurate if the
weather being
used to collect the data has been artificially modified?
I do follow this debate from a layman's perspective and the one thing I find really confusing is why when talking about climate science / climate change and the models being
used, they never talk about
weather modification programs that have been going on for over 70 years around the world.
Not all
weather modification activities, however, have been designed to benefit everyone, and have been
used for purposes of war.»
Such heavy spraying (above) is
used in conjunction with RF transmissions to manipulate
weather patterns; bizarre cloud configurations commonly occur due to the radio frequency bombardment of the atmosphere for climate
modification purposes.
WEATHER MODIFICATION METHOD The invention described herein may be manufactured and
used by or for the Government of the United States of America for Governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
While the second option, also called albedo
modification, is relatively inexpensive and could quickly lower the planet's temperature, it could have unwanted effects on the Earth's
weather pattern, which could potentially bring drought to some regions or be
used as a weapon by governments or certain individuals.