The phone - scraping revelations broke as full - page Facebook ads ran in several Sunday papers in the United Kingdom and United States, apologizing for having allowed Cambridge Analytica to use the personal data of some 50 million
users for political purposes.
Not exact matches
(Whether the 50 million affected Facebook
users will be notified that their data was used to build «psychographic profiles»
for the
purposes of shaping their
political beliefs remains to be seen.)
This week's revelations about a British
political consultancy's use of data from 50 million Facebook
users for potentially shady
purposes has prompted many people to declare they will quit the social network in protest.
«I doubt in Facebook's
user policy it says that
users can be advertised
for political purposes — it just has broad language to provide
for whatever use cases they want.
In the wake of revelations that the personal information of as many as 87 million Facebook
users was used by data analysis firm Cambridge Analytica in 2016
for political purposes, reports indicate Facebook will contribute raw, anonymized data to a new Social Data Initiative via what is described as an independent, transparent and peer — reviewed process.
Reacting to revelations that the
political research and consulting firm Cambridge Analytica obtained Facebook
user data
for the
purpose of influencing voters in multiple countries, the Internet Society called it «the natural outcome of today's data driven economy that puts businesses and others first, not
users» and called
for «higher standards
for transparency and ethics when it comes to the handling of our information.
And while Facebook has claimed it was unaware that ~ 50M Facebook
users» data was passed to Cambridge Analytica
for political targeting
purposes, Facebook has itself long been actively encouraging politicians and
political campaigns to make use of its tools — at a time when there was a complete lack of regulation
for political ads on digital platforms.
The researcher hired by Cambridge Analytica, Alexandr Kogan, told Facebook and his app's
users that he was collecting information
for academic
purposes, not
for a
political data firm owned by a wealthy conservative.
The researcher Aleksandr Kogan was banned from the platform
for creating the quiz app that was able to access 50 million
user profiles, which he then shared with Cambridge Analytica, after claiming the app was
for academic
purposes, not
political ones.
Reports that Facebook harvested and abused
users» data
for political purposes emerged Friday, as the company's former partnership with the voter - profiling company Cambridge Analytica was exposed.
The Apple chief has also called
for stronger data privacy regulations in light of the scandal, which saw the data of 50 million Facebook
users improperly harvested and used
for political purposes.
He'd presented the app to Facebook and to its
users as a project gathering
for academic research, but then had turned around and given it to a company that had not been named or identified, and which sought to use the data
for political, not academic,
purposes.
The consulting firm allegedly used the personal information of 50 million Facebook
users, without their permission,
for political purposes.
What do the Equifax breach, Cambridge Analytica's use of Facebook
users» data
for political campaign
purposes and Grindr's sharing of
users» HIV status have in common?
The company has been at the center of an unrelenting firestorm following revelations that it allowed Cambridge Analytica to mine private data belonging to 50 million of its
users without permission, which Cambridge Analytica then leveraged
for political purposes.
According to Facebook, Dr. Kogan provided Cambridge Analytica — a
political data analytics firm hired by President Donald Trump's campaign and financed by billionaire Robert Mercer — access to information about 50 million Facebook
users, all the while telling Facebook the data was being gathered
for academic
purposes.
Musk's decision comes as
users are abandoning Facebook in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica revelations, where it emerged that the startup had harvested 50 million
users» data
for political campaigning
purposes.
And while Facebook has claimed it was unaware that ~ 50M Facebook
users» data was passed to Cambridge Analytica
for political targeting
purposes, Facebook has itself long been actively encouraging politicians and
political campaigns to make use of its tools — at a time when there was a complete lack of regulation
for political ads on digital platforms.
It's those kinds of permissions that researcher Aleksandr Kogan allegedly abused years later to gather data on unwitting Facebook
users for purposes of targeted
political messaging.
To recap: Facebook has admitted that
political research firm Cambridge Analytica, linked to both President Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and the Brexit leave vote, improperly obtained data from as many as 87 million Facebook
users for ad targeting
purposes.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has admitted that his company had made mistakes in a data leak that caused grave concern about
user privacy possibly abused
for political purposes.
«It's time to protect yourself — and your friends — from Facebook,» read the click - bait headline Monday on Mashable, one of many columns this week decrying how Cambridge Analytica, a firm aligned with the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, scraped and mined data from many millions of unsuspecting
users of the social network and allegedly used them
for nefarious
political purposes.
So perhaps it's worried it might risk losing this chunk of elite business in the US if American Facebook
users have to give explicit consent to their
political leanings being fair game
for ad targeting
purposes.
The growing scandal over personal information on Facebook being tapped
for political purposes could result in the abandonment of the social media giant by
users angered that their information wasn't...
Facebook is proposing only narrow countermeasures that address the specifics of the furor over Cambridge Analytica, a
political consulting firm that's accused of improperly obtaining data from some 50 million Facebook
users for the
purpose of influencing voters.
EU Justice Commissioner Vera Jourova described as «horrifying» the reports that personal data of Facebook
users «could be so easily mishandled and used
for political purpose».
But that doesn't change the fact that the data of 50 million
users was obtained without express permission and used
for political purposes.