The long - term expected profit growth
uses analyst consensus estimates on a companies future earnings.
Not exact matches
We can not
use consensus values for our margin forecasts because our margin calculations take into account a great deal more data than is
used in most
analysts» models.
Using a discounted cash flow analysis (EPS = 5.87, 10 yr growth rate = 13 % (based on previous years), terminal growth rate = 4 %, discount rate = 10 %) I come up with a fair value estimate of $ 125.43, in line with the
analyst consensus.
Results
using consensus analyst forecasts rather than lagged earnings to calculate E / P over the 1977 - 2006 subperiod are similar, but not as strong.
According to a report in Reason Magazine, titled Union of Concerned Scientists Cooks the Books, Media Swallow It, UCS and its
analysts used corporate giving data to «imply that General Electric executives were climate change hypocrites,» supportive of some think tanks that are skeptical of the «scientific
consensus» on global warming, including Reason itself, which UCS accused of «misrepresenting climate change science.»
UCS and its
analysts used corporate data to «imply that General Electric executives were climate change hypocrites,» because GE has said it believes the «scientific
consensus» is humans are causing dangerous climate change while also supporting some think tanks who have written skeptically concerning the causes and consequences of climate change, including the Reason Foundation, which UCS accused of «misrepresenting climate change science.»