The agreement
uses aviation emissions levels in 2020 as a benchmark and aims to reduce growth above that level by 80 % until 2035.
Not exact matches
Soon after the delay to the decision was announced by Hoon last Christmas, the Miliband and Benn camps both contacted the Institute for Public Policy Research, over a pamphlet by Simon Retallack, the IPPR's head of climate change, arguing that the third runway should not go ahead unless the government required aircraft
using it to meet the
aviation industry's own targets to cut carbon dioxide
emissions and noise in new aircraft by 50 % and nitrogen oxides by 80 % by 2020.
Alternatives for
aviation industry and the military pose issues related to land
use, clearing peatland, fertilizer
use, costs and more
emissions
They appear to be related to differences in interpretation of INDCs, assumptions about other countries, level of disaggregation for small countries, choice of global warming potentials to compute carbon dioxide equivalent
emissions, treatment of
emissions related to land
use, and treatment of international
aviation and maritime shipping.
Emissions from
aviation and marine bunker fuels
used in international transport do not enter into any national undertakings.
Emissions from
aviation are extensively studied, with data from the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT)
used to ensure alignment with other solution models.
Yet, according to ICAO's 2013 projections, shown in the graph below,
emissions from the
aviation industry are set to grow 200 % -360 % on current levels by 2050, including the maximum
use of lower - carbon alternative fuels.
Emissions from fuel
used for international
aviation and maritime transport.
Information relevant to
emissions from fuel
used for international
aviation and maritime transport.
Growth in
aviation emissions alone offset more than one third of the
emissions decline from falling coal
use in the electric power sector.
Even in a best - case scenario — where
aviation companies choose to buy only UNFCCC credits, and the UNFCCC chooses not to include forest and land
use credits — there's still another way that airlines could be offsetting
emissions on paper and increasing
emissions in practice: double counting.
In Mueller's words, «it would not seem too farfetched to think that in California, at least, there could be sufficient political will to earmark some share of, say, California's
aviation revenue as a solidarity charge for the poorest and most vulnerable countries,» or that «California could decide to
use part of the revenue from auctioning allowances for its
emission trading scheme.»