The article expressly says «reportedly» in the title, and
uses such language as «apparently» and «may be»; again, that isn't confirmation, it's reporting a rumor.
Not exact matches
The company has raised more than $ 230 million in venture capital since its founding, from investors
such as Sigma West and Ignition Partners, and is
using that money to rapidly expand its business outside the U.S.. It's well on its way: DocuSign is available in 43
languages.
Wells Fargo's chatbot will
use artificial intelligence to respond to natural
language messages from users,
such as how much money they have in their accounts, and where the nearest bank ATM is.
Zocdoc recently added a feature that lets patients type in their symptoms
using natural
language and then matches them with an appropriate provider,
such as a doctor, dentist, nurse practitioner, or physical therapist.
Google also introduced PlaNet, which identifies where a photo was taken without
using geotags — instead relying on landmarks and clues
such as types of vegetation,
languages on signs, architectural styles, and the side of the road cars are driving on.
If you are hiring an expert,
such as a computer programmer or a lawyer, ask them to explain a particularly complex concept
using everyday
language that a non-expert can grasp without
using jargon.
Others will limit the
languages used on your documents though some,
such as Japan, welcome English.
What separates decentralized applications from standard applications is the infrastructure of their back - end servers, omitting the
use of programming
languages such as Rails or Django in favor of blockchain technology — removing centralized hosting services and putting power and voice back in the hands of its users.
Usage, Log, and Device Information: We collect information from your
use of the Startup Grind Service
such as system activity, hardware settings, browser type, browser
language, the date and time of your visit, and the referral URL.
Then there is the FACT that you continue to
use inflammatory
language such as «lack of intellectual honesty,» «too busy,» and «naive» and my developing THEORY that your arrogant attitude may be what is preventing both riches and fame from making their way into your life.
It could also mean developing new competencies,
such as pastoral counseling, a biblical
language, or mastering the accounting principles or computer software
used in managing the church's financial affairs.
I always try to be cautious though about
using language such as, «Now you guys have got it right!
4.8 - 13, which describes Christian existence first in eschatological terms
such as Jesus
used, and then in Paul's more typical
language of union with Christ.
In
such a materialistic society, the Church MUST reclaim the strong
language used by early church leaders to warn of the potential dangers of wealth, and we MUST be more careful of proclaiming all wealth
as an undisputed blessing from God.
Indeed, [d] expresses the same tension between order and novelty that was already expressed in the lines that precede it, except that the tension is expressed, in [d], in a technical
language (with terms
such as physical feelings and intellectual feelings) that is not
used in the immediate context.
As such, Jesus does not appear to have the need to fit everything in, follow a prayer outline,
use any special
language, remember any prayer requests, or even begin and end the prayer with a flowery introduction and conclusion.
Although they have
used feminist
language at times, their opposition to pornography stems much more from their nostalgia for a «purer» America, and they disagree with feminists on crucial issues
such as sex education and day care.
There are, for example, signals
used in animal communication, nonconventional signals which include some gestures, and single - word sentences
such as the word «Tree»
used by children in the early stages of
language acquisition.
It is astonishing to hear even people of high achievement and excellent reputation
use mean and foul
language on many occasions,
as though
such effusions had no real significance, being mere sounds which are dispersed
as soon
as they are said.
But of course the creedal statement, hallowed
as it is by centuries of
use during the celebration of the Eucharist, can be understood only when it is seen
as a combination of supposedly historical data, theological affirmation put in a quasi-philosophical idiom, and a good deal of symbolic
language (with the
use of
such phrases
as «came down from heaven», «ascended into heaven», and the like).
Bishop Paulose became a «secular theologian»
as he described himself, by
using such liberating and redeeming
language, listened to and understood perhaps by more outside the church than inside.
Start with the studies done by Jane Goodall, and then continue with a HUGE variety of other animal studies that PROVE animals have morals, they
use tools, build societies and cultures, have their own
languages (
such as the prarie dogs... simple little rodents right?
Therefore, preachers who become conscious of the social function of the
language of the sermon can
use language in
such a way
as to encourage social effects that are appropriate to the gospel.
If therefore the gospel is to be made intelligible, it must
use a
language such as men
use when they speak of events with an ultimate existential and cosmic significance.
The practical need for a common
language in a global society has already assisted the spread of the most widely -
used languages,
such as English and Spanish.
Under
such editorship, the church's
language would be «cleaned up,» striking all symbolic and mythological
uses as pre-literate, primitive, and meaningless.
We tend to
use the label «miracle» interchangeably in everyday
language with concepts
such as wondrous, amazing, and simply good luck.
An Emergent definition of relevance, modulated by resistance, might run something like this; relevance means listening before speaking; relevance means interpreting the culture to itself by noting the ways in which certain cultural productions gesture toward a transcendent grace and beauty; relevance means being ready to give an account for the hope that we have and being in places where someone might actually ask; relevance means believing that we might learn something from those who are most unlike us; relevance means not so much translating the churches
language to the culture
as translating the culture's
language back to the church; relevance means making theological sense of the depth that people discover in the oddest places of ordinary living and then
using that experience to draw them to the source of that depth (Augustine seems to imply
such a move in his reflections on beauty and transience in his Confessions).
When churches and / or pastors start to
use language,
such as vision, that I call a part of churchianity, it reminds me of double think from George Orwells book 1984.
How can we
use such anthropomorphic
language as the «wrath» of God?
What he attacks in Ogden is the belief that there is any trustworthy
language about God at all, either analogical
language or retranslations
such as the odd one Ogden
uses: God
as «experienced non-objective reality.»
As I tried to show in my first book (Capek 1969) as well as in some of my articles, such theories, when closely analyzed, can not be even stated in a self - consistent language, since they use alternately and surreptitiously two incompatible temporal description
As I tried to show in my first book (Capek 1969)
as well as in some of my articles, such theories, when closely analyzed, can not be even stated in a self - consistent language, since they use alternately and surreptitiously two incompatible temporal description
as well
as in some of my articles, such theories, when closely analyzed, can not be even stated in a self - consistent language, since they use alternately and surreptitiously two incompatible temporal description
as in some of my articles,
such theories, when closely analyzed, can not be even stated in a self - consistent
language, since they
use alternately and surreptitiously two incompatible temporal descriptions.
Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic
language when what is needed is a competent journalist
used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised
as such by all the major cultures of the world.
Gender has surreptitiously helped itself to the
language of the body,
using words
such as «boy» and «woman» to signify a mere state of mind.
A clear example of
language of formal definition appears in Ordinatio Sacradotalis, wherein Pope John Paul II
uses words
such as «We teach and declare» to define the Church's teaching on the priesthood.
It is possible therefore — and it is entirely legitimate — to engage in the metaphysical enterprise with the
use of
such languages as we possess.
He declared that vast majority are lost... even
using language such as a hotter place in hell for those like them.
To claim that church and wife are one and the same is to also say that Jesus wasn't skillful enough in his
use of
language to avoid confusion in the minds of regular people and so must be interpreted by the professed learned
such as yourself in order for us mere mortals to grasp their true meaning, thereby revealing a flaw in this god's claim of being all - knowing and all-wise.
A logical analysis of the
use and meaning of words, it was said, led to two types of
language: (1) tautologies, where what is said is logically true,
as in mathematics or in
such statements
as «a rose is a rose» or «I am I,» and (2) synthetic or nonanalytic sentences, in which the meaning is its method of verification.
Ordinarily, culture is sub-divided into two categories, «material culture,» referring to the physical objects people
use,
such as clubs, pots and pans, automobiles, and «non-material culture,» describing
such non-physical aspects of human life
as ideas, knowledge,
language, and conduct.
He hardly speaks in parables at all, though he does
use figurative
language, and in
such discourses
as that of the Vine and the Branches, and the Good Shepherd, he does approach the parable type.
Such language,
as Rudolf Bultmann once said, is unscientific and can not be accepted by modern men who
use electric light.
A flagrant foul will be defined
as a foul that may or may not involve physical contact, but involves
such acts
as fighting, contacting a game official, fouls so severe
as to place an opponent at risk, persistent or extreme abusive conduct and the
use of vulgar
language or gestures.
The guidelines repeatedly reference breastfeeding quotas, instructs healthcare facilities to keep formula «out of view of patients and the general public,» and
uses insulting
language such as, «human milk fed through the mother's own breast is the normal way for human infants to be nourished.»
-LSB-...] have no problem with programs that work nutrition education into the school curriculum,
such as Recipe for Success's innovative seed - to - plate approach that
use math, science and
language arts while showing impoverished kids how their food grows and -LSB-...]
They also tended to
use more
language that reflected achievement,
such as words that included «proud,» «win,» or «best.»
Also have your child evaluated by a speech -
language pathologist if she still
uses immature sentence forms,
such as «I no want to go,» has trouble learning new words, or leaves out words in sentences and leaves out «I» in statements, saying, for instance, «Me want that [ball].»
They can take preventative measures
such as using age - appropriate
language to set simple rules with toddlers.
At that time we
used the
language in the General Labelling Directive 2000 / 13 / EC on labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for sale to the ultimate consumer Article 2 (1) of which stated that: «The labelling and methods
used must not: (a) be
such as could mislead the purchaser to a material degree, particularly: (iii) by suggesting that the foodstuff possesses special characteristics when in fact all similar foodstuffs possess
such characteristics.»
Many of these same children can
use simple sign
language such as more and please.