Not exact matches
Dodd does not question Jesus»
use of
apocalyptic language.
27 that suggests the
use of
apocalyptic special effects
language instead of straightforward history, he is publicly called on by Geisler to recant and apologize for straying from inerrancy.
That said, and regarding «AIT», much as I admire Al Gore's sentiment, I think the
use of exaggeration and
apocalyptic language actually works * against * the clarity of the climate science, such as it stands at present, rather than promoting clarity.
Nick Odoni wrote: «I think the
use of exaggeration and
apocalyptic language actually works * against * the clarity of the climate science, such as it stands at present, rather than promoting clarity.»