Sentences with phrase «using climatological»

The controversial connection between cosmic rays, solar activity, and cloud cover is investigated using a climatological reconstructed reanalysis product: the North American Regional Reanalysis which provides high - resolution, low, mid-level, high, and total cloud cover data over a Lambert conformal conic projection permitting land / ocean discrimination.
First we are using climatological wind forcing and can not take into account the real weather situations.
The QCRAD methodology uses climatological analyses of the surface radiation measurements to define reasonable limits for testing the data for unusual data values.
The top panel shows the experiments which used climatological (unchanging) SSTs; here the influence comes primarily from the solar UV variations affecting the stratosphere.

Not exact matches

The climatological effect of this borrowed energy use and resulting emissions can be debated, but the reality of an agricultural system heavily reliant on fossil fuel and mechanization is indisputable.
I also used surface observations and climatological data from Albany International Airport and a report from a local volunteer weather observer.
Unlike the original reconstruction of Mann et al (1998), the reconstruction that McIntyre and McKitrick produced using the censored data set fails standard statistical tests for validity, and, in the words of the NCAR group, is «shown to be without statistical and climatological merit».
Let's say you claim a «slowdown» in 1998: you can use the data before then to estimate what the climatological temperature is, e.g. by linear regression from 1970 - 1998.
Using a range of summer climatological weather distributions is not too poor an approach for a probability outlook.
In the case of the North American ITRDB data used by MBH98, the reference means were chosen to be the 20th century calibration period climatological means.
«But no radiative data is used» It must be incorporated in his model, he states «The all - sky climatological greenhouse effect (the difference of the all - sky surface upward flux and absorbed solar flux) at this surface is equal to the reflected solar radiation.»
For those of us who used to admire science, and who are concerned about the possible adverse effects of human activity on the environment, the behavior of the climatological community gatekeepers of credibility is disappointing.
[3] Surfacestations.org describes itself as a «grass roots organization» that uses volunteers to collect information on weather stations that are part of the United States Historical Climatological Network (USHCN) and Global Historical Climatological Network (GHCN).
Report of the second session of the CCl Working Group on Operational Use of Climatological Knowledge (Geneva, 28 - 31 May 1996) and Report of the Meeting of Experts on CLIPS (Geneva, 22 - 24 May 1996).
«Estimating changes in global temperature since the pre-industrial period» «A reassessment of temperature variations and trends from global reanalyses and monthly surface climatological datasets» «Deducing Multidecadal Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «Early onset of industrial - era warming across the oceans and continents»
Carbon Brief produced a raw global temperature record using using unadjusted ICOADS sea surface temperature measurements gridded by the UK Hadley Centre and raw land temperature measurements assembled by NOAA in version 4 of the Global Historical Climatological Network (GHCN).
************** «witchtistics»: use of a «witch stick» (eg, least squares regression) to «divine» the global temperature temperature trend (or other climatological trends) over short time periods.
In his talk, he discussed how to catalogue the occurance of extreme precipitation across British Columbia, using a new comprehensive data set from Environment Canada, in order to create a climatological baseline.
Gallo, K., et al. (1996) The Influence of Land Use / Land Cover on Climatological Values of the Diurnal Temperature Range.
The Assessment Report of 2001 for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows how well the climatological models it uses are able to duplicate the current climate characteristics.
These climatological values at each site are interpolated from the 1981 - 2010 monthly climatology grids, using the bi-cubic polynomial interpolation technique mentioned above.
However, for long term multi-year Climatological uses, it is perhaps easy to overestimate the impact of these problems.
Normal, non-ideology-based scientists question the veracity of the CRU — IPCC flavoured results just because the JBM camaraderie - based group did refuse to honour such requests and people ask the following question: why, if both the empirical results — the raw data (including the nitty - gritty details of the temperature measurements) AND the theoretical model - based machinery are above board and the overall climatological picture of a man (n)- made warming is pretty much a safe bet, why then would some AGW researchers like the JBM gang refuse to accept that they, too, have got to conform to normal scientific procedure and release the raw data and the details of the theoretical machinery used to understand those data?
-- For the locations in the contiguous U.S. examined in this study, the past six years (POR 2011 - 2016) have seen average annual temperatures that are 1.2 °F above the current 30 - year climatological average used by NOAA (1981 - 2010).
Additionally, several climatological oscillatory mode data will be used as controls to assess the correlations between GCR flux, solar activity, and cloud cover: specifically the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), the multivariate El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO).
Climate change doubters used this analysis to support their belief that — despite climatological data which includes 800,000 year ice - core records of atmospheric carbon dioxide — humans have not affected the atmosphere by releasing billions of tons of carbon dioxide per year.
The international conference «TRACE 2018 — Tree Rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology» will bring together scientists and students that use tree rings as archives of environmental, historical, and climatological information.
A subset of the 7,000 or so co-op stations are part of the U.S. Historical Climatological Network (USHCN), and are used to create the official estimate of U.S. temperatures.
Other datasets used in the WMO announcement, which are derived from monthly climatological data for a smaller number of long - term observing sites, are also expected to concur when they are released shortly.
Using daily station - based precipitation records from the United States Historical Climatological Network for the years 1979 - 2008, it is found that there are two distinct sub-regions.
The system being used by the entire climatological establishment is fundamentally flawed and must not be relied upon as a basis for policy decisions of any kind.
It's common knowledge among experienced professionals that, outside the English - speaking world, other countries use a great variety of methods in determining the «mean monthly temperature,» which is the customary datum used in climatological work.
Using surface measurements of maximum and minimum temperatures from the Global Daily Climatological Network data set, we find evidence of a weekly cycle in diurnal temperature range (DTR) for many stations in the United States, Mexico, Japan, and China.
The results also suggest that changes in the predominant LULC (land use / land cover) conditions, within as great as a 10000 m radius of an observation station, could significantly influence the climatological DTR.»
ICOADS evidently performs such QC basics as determining that the measurements were indeed made at sea and not on land and trimming data to produce two statistical product lines: one where a trim is based on 3.5 standard deviations of smoothed median value for each box and three separate climatological periods and another using 4.5 standard deviations.
To account for the variations in clouds, humidity and temperature, Myhre and Stordahl took the approach of using temperature and water vapor from the ECMWF analyses, climatological ozone data, and ISCCP cloud data; if I were designing this experiment, I would have made the same choices.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z