Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and
uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in
tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
tax (including U.S.
tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017),
environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
The order does not call on regional authorities to shut down mining operations directly, but instead to put the squeeze on them by strictly enforcing policies on electricity consumption, land
use,
tax collection and
environmental regulation.
Form W - 9
Tax ID # and Certification Primarily for
use by direct customers of Clean Harbors
Environmental Services
I have
used a fall in exports to show how constrained Beijing's policy choices are, but I could just have easily done the same
using as an example any change in the currency regime, the reform of the hukou system, the de-industrialization of the bankrupt northeast provinces, the development of the OBOR and Silk Road projects, changes in interest rates or minimum reserves, protecting the stock market from crashing, the provincial bond swaps, changes in the
tax regime, improving energy and
environmental policies, and so on.
In the article, the MSM propagandist states such things as: 2017 has seen, according to his one time Goldman Sachs source, a «dramatic crash in [physical gold coin] demand,» that interest in gold coins is linked to «political conservatism, or anarcho - libertarianism» and «end of the world right wing sentiments,» that gold has been implicated in a «conspiracy to commit money laundering,» that gold is «financed by people in the narcotics trade,» that it comes from «illegal mines and drug dealers in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador,» that «the federal authorities assume the NTR Metals [case] represented only a fraction of illegally sourced and financed gold,» that therefore the US attorney is broadly investigating the gold industry, that gold is «produced by exploited workers,» that «crude [gold] extraction techniques create serious and lasting
environmental damage,» that gold plays an important part in «
tax evasion,» that it is related to American gun sales, which the author abhors; that «drug dealers [
use] gold imports as a way of laundering their proceeds,» and that «they came to realize that illegal gold [is] an intrinsically better business» than drug dealing; to name but a few of the aspersions cast against gold in the short article.
That now appears to be the case, with measures taken to «guide» them out by
using «electricity price, land
use,
tax, and
environmental protection, among other things.»
The Party also promises to help the forestry industry by examining a
tax credit for the purchasing of machinery for efficiency and
environmental performance, streamlining forestry regulations and supporting the development of biomass products that
use wood fibre.
The news comes as scores of UK hospitality firms are beginning to change their policies on plastic waste, while some
environmental campaigners are attempting to
tax single -
use plastic products in an effort to discourage their
use.
She'll hope for a day when the government will provide
tax breaks to parents who
use a diaper service and consider
taxing disposable products because of their
environmental impact.
The state legislature has a game plan: get approval for debt, gambling or additional
taxes by promising they will be
used for things like the
environmental trust fund, the Second Avenue Subway and East Side Access, mass transit in general, and in - classroom schools.
After protesting the budget Suffolk County leaders approved last fall,
environmental groups have now sued the county over its
use of nearly $ 33 million in funds that were raised through the Drinking Water Protection Program, a self - imposed
tax that Suffolk residents have voted to levy upon themselves several times since the late 1980s.
It is also
used for its secondary effects: punitive taxation, taxation
used as an incentive (e.g. protectionist tariffs,
environmental taxes to reduce pollution, sin
taxes on gambling or drugs, financial transaction
taxes, Pigovian
taxes), foreign policy (tariffs), wealth redistribution (progressive taxation, negative income
tax).
Local governments and
environmental groups have united to blast an executive state budget proposal to
use payment - in - lieu - of -
taxes agreements instead of market value to calculate
taxes on the vast Forest Preserve holdings in the Adirondack Park and the Catskills.
Galesi received
tax breaks for
environmental remediation at the new Golub headquarters; $ 583,162 a year in
tax exemptions for the new Center City building, and was recently rolled into a federal package to receive money to demolish a former county department of social services building so the land could be
used for apartments.
The imposition of a substantial severance
tax should be considered in New York State not only to ensure that the state will have some revenue to
use for mitigation of
environmental, health and infrastructure degradation, but also to ensure some revenue to the state in the likely event that the overall economic impact is not as substantial as is currently being assumed.
In exchange for talking job creation and revitalization, and for stroking the egos and jazzing the war chests and vacation trips of assorted little Caesars, Widgetom receives
tax breaks, public utility deals, EZ loans, and exemptions from
environmental and land
use regulations.
Working at the Ministry of the Environment we introduced an
environmental tax on fossil energy use in the first National Environmental Policy Plan (the
environmental tax on fossil energy
use in the first National
Environmental Policy Plan (the
Environmental Policy Plan (the Netherlands).
For example, if the government provides an income
tax deduction for
using, or not
using, some pollution related device, the cost of this in lost revenue short term might be offset or more than offset, by the savings in less damage to the environment, as well as savings in cost of other methods of controlling this same
environmental hazard.
Working at the Ministry of the Environment we introduced an
environmental tax on fossil energy use in the first National Environmental Policy Plan (the
environmental tax on fossil energy
use in the first National
Environmental Policy Plan (the
Environmental Policy Plan (the Netherlands).
Cap - and - trade systems
using tradable permits are sometimes an alternative to
environmental tax restructuring.
Unfortunately, the company's policies are underwritten by Red Sands Insurance, which did not have any ethical policies for investments and received Ethical Consumer's worst ratings for both likely
use of
tax avoidance strategies and
environmental reporting.
Environmental tax shifting is becoming commonplace in Europe, where France, Italy, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom are also
using this policy instrument.
The Cato authors argue that
using the proceeds from a carbon
tax to cut other
taxes will not produce a net improvement in economic welfare if we divorce that conversation from any consideration of
environmental benefits.
I thought that the West won the Cold War
using progressive income
taxes, a welfare state, nanny - statism, and «jobs - killing» regulations on the financial market and on
environmental degradation.
The company also scores Ethical Consumer's worst ratings for likely
use of
tax avoidance strategies,
environmental reporting and supply chain management.
This paper analyses the individual
taxes as well as the combination of all these
taxes and duties related to
environmental concerns, including
taxes on heating, transport fuels, electricity, water, waste, plastic bags, registration of cars, annual car
use, pesticides, etc..
A 2014 IMF report (covering over 150 countries) provides estimates for
taxes on fossil fuel products to reflect pollution and other
environmental impacts associated with energy
use, while underscoring the large
environmental, health, and fiscal benefits from
tax reform and the critical role of finance ministries in administration and ensuring efficient
use of revenues.
Our carbon dividend strategy has four interrelated elements that account for its strength: a gradually rising and revenue - neutral carbon
tax; carbon dividend payments made equally to all Americans, to be funded
using all the carbon -
tax revenue; rollback of costly command - and - control regulations that were implemented because the
environmental costs of carbon fuels have not been incorporated into their price; and border adjustment to ensure a level playing field and U.S. competitiveness.
Energy and Environment: Repudiate the Paris Climate Agreement Defund the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Overturn or at Least Defund the EPA's Clean Power Plan Repeal the EPA's Purloined Power to Legislate Climate Policy Repeal the EPA's Carbon Dioxide Standards for New Fossil - Fuel Power Plants Oppose Carbon
Taxes Prohibit
Use of Social Cost of Carbon as a Justification for Regulating Emissions Freeze and Sunset the Renewable Fuel Standard Require all Agencies to Meet Rigorous Scientific Standards Address Unaccountable
Environmental Research Programs
(11/15/07) «Ban the Bulb: Worldwide Shift from Incandescents to Compact Fluorescents Could Close 270 Coal - Fired Power Plants» (5/9/07) «Massive Diversion of U.S. Grain to Fuel Cars is Raising World Food Prices» (3/21/07) «Distillery Demand for Grain to Fuel Cars Vastly Understated: World May Be Facing Highest Grain Prices in History» (1/4/07) «Santa Claus is Chinese OR Why China is Rising and the United States is Declining» (12/14/06) «Exploding U.S. Grain Demand for Automotive Fuel Threatens World Food Security and Political Stability» (11/3/06) «The Earth is Shrinking: Advancing Deserts and Rising Seas Squeezing Civilization» (11/15/06) «U.S. Population Reaches 300 Million, Heading for 400 Million: No Cause for Celebration» (10/4/06) «Supermarkets and Service Stations Now Competing for Grain» (7/13/06) «Let's Raise Gas
Taxes and Lower Income
Taxes» (5/12/06) «Wind Energy Demand Booming: Cost Dropping Below Conventional Sources Marks Key Milestone in U.S. Shift to Renewable Energy» (3/22/06) «Learning From China: Why the Western Economic Model Will not Work for the World» (3/9/05) «China Replacing the United States and World's Leading Consumer» (2/16/05)» Foreign Policy Damaging U.S. Economy» (10/27/04) «A Short Path to Oil Independence» (10/13/04) «World Food Security Deteriorating: Food Crunch In 2005 Now Likely» (05/05/04) «World Food Prices Rising: Decades of
Environmental Neglect Shrinking Harvests in Key Countries» (04/28/04) «Saudis Have U.S. Over a Barrel: Shifting Terms of Trade Between Grain and Oil» (4/14/04) «Europe Leading World Into Age of Wind Energy» (4/8/04) «China's Shrinking Grain Harvest: How Its Growing Grain Imports Will Affect World Food Prices» (3/10/04) «U.S. Leading World Away From Cigarettes» (2/18/04) «Troubling New Flows of
Environmental Refugees» (1/28/04) «Wakeup Call on the Food Front» (12/16/03) «Coal: U.S. Promotes While Canada and Europe Move Beyond» (12/3/03) «World Facing Fourth Consecutive Grain Harvest Shortfall» (9/17/03) «Record Temperatures Shrinking World Grain Harvest» (8/27/03) «China Losing War with Advancing Deserts» (8/4/03) «Wind Power Set to Become World's Leading Energy Source» (6/25/03) «World Creating Food Bubble Economy Based on Unsustainable
Use of Water» (3/13/03) «Global Temperature Near Record for 2002: Takes Toll in Deadly Heat Waves, Withered Harvests, & Melting Ice» (12/11/02) «Rising Temperatures & Falling Water Tables Raising Food Prices» (8/21/02) «Water Deficits Growing in Many Countries» (8/6/02) «World Turning to Bicycle for Mobility and Exercise» (7/17/02) «New York: Garbage Capital of the World» (4/17/02) «Earth's Ice Melting Faster Than Projected» (3/12/02) «World's Rangelands Deteriorating Under Mounting Pressure» (2/5/02) «World Wind Generating Capacity Jumps 31 Percent in 2001» (1/8/02) «This Year May be Second Warmest on Record» (12/18/01) «World Grain Harvest Falling Short by 54 Million Tons: Water Shortages Contributing to Shortfall» (11/21/01) «Rising Sea Level Forcing Evacuation of Island Country» (11/15/01) «Worsening Water Shortages Threaten China's Food Security» (10/4/01) «Wind Power: The Missing Link in the Bush Energy Plan» (5/31/01) «Dust Bowl Threatening China's Future» (5/23/01) «Paving the Planet: Cars and Crops Competing for Land» (2/14/01) «Obesity Epidemic Threatens Health in Exercise - Deprived Societies» (12/19/00) «HIV Epidemic Restructuring Africa's Population» (10/31/00) «Fish Farming May Overtake Cattle Ranching As a Food Source» (10/3/00) «OPEC Has World Over a Barrel Again» (9/8/00) «Climate Change Has World Skating on Thin Ice» (8/29/00) «The Rise and Fall of the Global Climate Coalition» (7/25/00) «HIV Epidemic Undermining sub-Saharan Africa» (7/18/00) «Population Growth and Hydrological Poverty» (6/21/00) «U.S. Farmers Double Cropping Corn And Wind Energy» (6/7/00) «World Kicking the Cigarette Habit» (5/10/00) «Falling Water Tables in China» (5/2/00) Top of page
, the Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, would prohibit the
Environmental Protection Agency from
using the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and thereby put a potentially huge indirect
tax on American consumers and businesses.
Now back to the carbon
tax debate: If the government is going to levy a $ 20 / ton carbon
tax for
environmental purposes anyway, then it can achieve even more benefits by taking that revenue and
using it to reduce marginal
tax rates elsewhere in the code.
Using border
tax adjustments - where companies have
environmental taxes rebated to them upon export and have domestic
environmental taxes added to imports - can ensure international competitiveness without
tax exemptions.
This misinformation has been
used to set
environmental and
tax policy which increases governmental and bureaucratic control over every citizen.
With Prof. David Weisbach (Univ. of Chicago Law School), Prof. Metcalf authored «The Design of a Carbon
Tax» (Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2009) addressing carbon tax design issues: the tax rate (including distributional issues, the use of the revenues, and tax rate changes), the tax base, and international trade concer
Tax» (Harvard
Environmental Law Review, 2009) addressing carbon
tax design issues: the tax rate (including distributional issues, the use of the revenues, and tax rate changes), the tax base, and international trade concer
tax design issues: the
tax rate (including distributional issues, the use of the revenues, and tax rate changes), the tax base, and international trade concer
tax rate (including distributional issues, the
use of the revenues, and
tax rate changes), the tax base, and international trade concer
tax rate changes), the
tax base, and international trade concer
tax base, and international trade concerns.
By
using tax, people are forced to choose the side of
environmental politicians.
A new study in
Environmental Research Letters shows that applying a theoretic carbon
tax — one aimed at stimulating changes to farming and land -
use practices that minimize emissions — could have...
The long - term rate of economic growth follows an inverted V - shaped curve relative to the growth rate of the
environmental tax, and it is maximized by the least aggressive
tax policy of those that asymptotically eliminate the
use of polluting inputs.
Sin is understood to be the best thing to
tax, but
taxing it is generally seen as impractical, due to sin being generally underground (driven there by laws, with
taxes thus reduced to excises on alcohol and tobacco)... However,
taxing Carbon is easy, even when Carbon
use is regarded as sinful, because there is no chance of anyone covering it up in a big way... All that had to be done was to put a handle on it, on Carbon
use as sinful, that bureaucrats could
use, scientific proof, formulae, models, and all that, and surround them with minders,
Environmental PR minders.
They have
taxed their residents to fund emission reduction efforts, limited their own fossil fuel
use, and tried to prohibit or reduce the
environmental impacts of fossil fuel production within their borders.»
From Seattle's efforts to eliminate 2 million straws to the UK embracing a
tax on single
use plastics, there's been a sudden burst of momentum on tackling this
environmental scourge.
Within the transportation sector, the
environmental damages per unit of fuel consumption are $ 3.80 (− 1.80 / +2.10) per gallon of gasoline
using a 3 % discount rate, far larger than the current federal
tax of $ 0.184 per gallon and more than 7x greater than the typical combined local, state and federal gasoline
tax (additional negative externalities associated with gasoline
use should be part of an optimal fuel
tax).
Chair of the Committee Labour MP Joan Walley says, «Recent Budgets have created the perception that
environmental taxes are simply being
used to pinch extra pennies from people.
We regularly advise clients in the areas of general municipal law, land
use and development, zoning and condemnation, charter and ordinance drafting,
environmental law, contract drafting and interpretation, employment matters, collective bargaining,
tax appeals, compliance with open meeting and public record laws, risk management, and litigation.
Boston Antitrust Law Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Biotechnology Law Corporate Law Criminal Defense: White - Collar Eminent Domain and Condemnation Law
Environmental Law General Commercial Litigation Information Technology Law Intellectual Property Law International Arbitration Land
Use & Zoning Law Mergers & Acquisitions Law Non - Profit / Charities Law Real Estate Law Securities / Capital Markets Law
Tax Law Technology Law Trusts & Estates Law Venture Capital Law
Brach Eichler has over 70 lawyers focusing on health care law, real estate law (including
environmental, land
use and
tax appeals), litigation, trusts and estates, corporate, intellectual property, labor and employment, family law, and personal injury.
Aird & Berlis provides strategic legal and business advice in all principal areas of business law, including corporate finance, banking, insolvency and restructuring, energy,
environmental, infrastructure / P3, technology and intellectual property, litigation, workplace law, municipal and land
use planning, real estate and
tax.
The firm represents corporate, governmental, and nonprofit entities, as well as individual clients, in a wide range of matters, including corporate; business and insurance litigation;
tax and
tax - exempt; finance; public finance; land
use,
environmental and utilities, and real estate; health law; labor, employment, and benefits; intellectual property and technology; data privacy and security; and government relations.
At the administrative, trial, and appellate levels, Mr. Peloso litigates business and real property disputes, including real estate, land
use,
environmental, and property
tax matters.
The term «cost» as
used herein means only those charges specifically authorized by the electric utility's tariff, including but not limited to the customer, energy, demand, fuel, conservation, capacity and
environmental charges made by the electric utility plus applicable
taxes and fees to the customer of record responsible for the master meter payments.