Sentences with phrase «using federal poverty»

Applicants are screened for financial eligibility using federal poverty guidelines.

Payments are based on a borrower's discretionary income, which is determined based on family size using the federal poverty guidelines.

We use the federal poverty guidelines for our qualifications.

Not exact matches

Poverty guidelines: Income levels used to determine eligibility for participation in means - tested federal programs.

«First, the officials at Federal level, working with the State officials, identify the poorest Local Government Areas, using an existing poverty map for the State, then the LG officials identify the poorest communities in the LGAs and we send our teams there.

The loan involved the use of federal block grant funds awarded the city to combat poverty and blight.

That's not counting the $ 11.6 million low - interest line of credit Delaware North obtained from the city when it moved into its new quarters for a spell, until federal officials objected because the money was supposed to be used to combat poverty and blight.

In 2015 and 2016, current tobacco use prevalence was about 10 % for adults in higher income households (greater than 400 % of the Federal Poverty Level) compared with almost 25 % for adults in households below the povertPoverty Level) compared with almost 25 % for adults in households below the povertypoverty line.

The federal poverty level, still the most commonly used benchmark for determining who is defined as poor or in need of public assistance, was created in the 1960s and is based primarily on estimates of minimal food costs.

Using census data to sort districts within each state by the federal poverty rate among school - age children, the group identified the poorest and richest districts - those with the highest and lowest poverty rates, respectively, whose enrollments compose 25 percent of the state's total enrollment - and matched that information with education revenues from state and local (but not federal) sources.

In the NAEP analysis, the authors estimate student poverty with data from the federal lunch program and estimate additional student characteristics using data on possession of an Individualized Education Program (IEP) and English Language Learner (ELL) status, admittedly a common practice when analyzing education data.

These formulas send some funds on a uniform, per - disadvantaged - child basis, but direct close to half of federal dollars in a way that recognizes high - poverty districts face greater challenges, using weights to allocate per - eligible funds progressively with respect to a district's poverty rate.

Data based on the poverty line — the income level at which people are considered to be poor — are used to determine eligibility for many federal - aid programs, including Title I and the school - lunch program.

These sections of the federal law place identifying and addressing childhood trauma and other variables linked to poverty alongside policy options for recruiting and retaining effective teachers and school leaders, maximizing the impact of early childhood education, using data to improve student achievement, and serving students with disabilities.

In early 2014, Alexander introduced a bill in the Senate that would redirect $ 24 billion of federal education funding and incentivize states to use the money to fund 11 million school vouchers for students in poverty.

Title I targeted assistance — Federal funding is used to meet the needs of the educationally disadvantaged students only and the poverty percentages must be at least 35 percent or above the districtwide average.

Title I school - wide assistance — Title I schools with 40 percent or greater high - poverty, student population may use federal funding to meet the needs of all students at the school.

States would be able to use the money to offer prekindergarten to low - income families, defined as those making at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level.

As we demonstrated in our 2015 analysis of the Common Core debate on Twitter, the dispute about the standards was largely a proxy war over other politically - charged issues, including opposition to a federal role in education, which many believe should be the domain of state and local education policy; a fear that the Common Core could become a gateway for access to data on children that might be used for exploitive purposes rather than to inform educational improvement; a source for the proliferation of testing which has come to oppressively dominate education; a way for business interests to exploit public education for private gain; or a belief that an emphasis on standards reform distracts from the deeper underlying causes of low educational performance, which include poverty and social inequity.

Many school districts are using the federal free - and - reduced lunch (poverty) guidelines to qualify the students who will receive the technology.

Using data from the 2012 - 2013 school year, the study determined that 51 percent of all students in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade were eligible under the federal program for free and reduced - price lunch, a standard measure of the number of children living in poverty.

At the federal level, the Department of Education could promote the use of ESSA funding for expanded school schedules, encouraging high - poverty schools to use funds from Title I, Part A to pay for longer school days as part of a larger effort to boost student achievement.

If your modified adjusted gross income is less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level, then you likely qualify for tax credits that can be used to reduce the monthly cost of premiums.

Be aware, however, that the rounding rules for these calculations, as well as procedures for calculating monthly income, are determined by the federal, state, and local program offices that use the poverty guidelines for eligibility purposes.

The federal poverty guidelines are the second component of this equation, and they're used to estimate costs of associated with a minimum standard of living in the United States.

The federal poverty guidelines are used to estimate the cost of maintaining a minimum standard of living in the United States for the purposes of determining eligibility for certain federal programs.

Federal poverty levels are used to determine your eligibility for certain programs and benefits, including savings on Marketplace health insurance, and Medicaid and CHIP coverage.

The rarely used Bryant test ties undue hardship to federal poverty guidelines.

And if the federal poverty level safe harbor method is used, it's based on the poverty level for just one person.

If your income is between 100 % and 250 % of federal poverty level, you'll not only get government help paying for health insurance, you may also get additional government help paying your deductible, copays, and coinsurance when you use your health insurance.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services determines the federal poverty level (FPL) every year, and these values are used to set the eligibility standards for Medicaid.

Similarly, families with household incomes at or below 185 % of the federal poverty level are eligible to use the federally - funded nutrition program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).