Sentences with phrase «using flawed science»

«All too often we see the Agency using flawed science for political purposes, but this report — partially funded by environmental activists no less — shows EPA's emissions estimates from hydraulic fracturing are way off.»

«Today, I call on the leaders of the American Bird Conservancy, The Wildlife Society, and the leadership of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who persist in using flawed science and vicious rhetoric like Dauphine's to blame cats for species decline, to stop.»

Not exact matches

An international consortium of scientists that was recently assembled to review the science on BPA for the German UmweltBundesAmt (that country's equivalent of the Environmental Protection Agency) determined that the research FDA used in its safety assessment was flawed because it failed to consider the chemical's effects on behavior and prostate development, according to a copy of the group's conclusions provided to ScientificAmerican.com.

Science is meanwhile using the traits of the flawed being to contemplate how to utilize bionics, marine biology and microbiology to copy animals, plants and the rest of the environment.

It was foolish when the last of them were built, old designs keep being used even when science has already found their flaws.

According to a critical review (PDF) by Bob Ward at the London School of Economics and Political Science, the GWPF pamphlet uses a «combination of misrepresentation, bad economics and fundamentally flawed science, and simply recycles erroneous allegations that were made, and debunked, six years ago.Science, the GWPF pamphlet uses a «combination of misrepresentation, bad economics and fundamentally flawed science, and simply recycles erroneous allegations that were made, and debunked, six years ago.science, and simply recycles erroneous allegations that were made, and debunked, six years ago.»

However from what I have read and what I have seen, much of the actual science seems to be flawed, and is heavily weighted on assumptions which are in turn based on assumptions, based on sketchy data, in which much of the methods used are questionable.

In a paper last year, Professor Robert Pindyck from the Massachusetts Institute Technology concluded the so - called integrated assessment models used to combine climate science with economics have «crucial flaws that make them close to useless as tools for policy analysis».

Further review by the national academy of science and multiple university reviews of the committee findings found that by and large, the Hockey Stick was not flawed enough for them to consider it inappropriate for use as a model to represent the climate variability for the time period specified.

For a much more detailed discussion of a sceptical scientist's view of the validity of using model output as the basis for policing making in climate science, take a look at Dr Roy Spencer's explanation of how these models work and why he thinks they are flawed:

First, you write, «Whatever flaws or ambiguities exist in the paper, the use of the letters as source materials for any comparison can not purely be a test of agreement with the IPCC (as we stated above — you could agree with every word in the IPCC report and still not want to do anything about emissions), but must be a test of someone's opinion about what to do about it... Thus the only way in my mind to interpret a comparison of signers is a categorization by policy direction, not understanding or agreement on the science.

The FSR concludes that the science underpinning the LTDNA analytical services, as provided to the criminal justice system, is sound and that the three forensic service suppliers offering such services have properly validated their processes, adding that there was no flaw inherent in the process which prevents its use within the criminal justice system.