President Donald Trump has vowed to prevent North Korea from having that capability —
using military force if necessary.
That was a milestone in its decades - long drive to pose an atomic threat to its American adversary that Trump has vowed to prevent,
using military force if necessary.
However, I do believe that North Korea now believes President Trump will
use military force if he has to.
Not exact matches
«For example, the President could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the
military to
use such
force if necessary to protect the homeland in the circumstances of a catastrophic attack like the ones suffered on December 7, 1941 and on September 11, 2001.»
Instead of supporting this attempt — a drive that has the positive consequence for world peace that it will limit U.S.
military adventurism (much as the Vietnam War finally
forced the dollar off gold in 1971), Krugman is
using the crisis to attack China — as
if its success is what is harming U.S. labor.
If that were not in place, the War Powers Act, which, ironically, was meant to set boundaries on the Executive Branch
use of
military force, would still allow for this action, in all probability.
Any hypothetical
military engagement where a nuclear armed country were to be in danger of being completely overrun would change the calculation on whether they would be willing to
use nuclear weapons, but Russia probably would not, for example,
use their nuclear weapons as a deterrent against attacks against their conventional troops in Ukraine, even
if they were in danger of being
forced out of Ukraine completely because the retaliation would cost much more to them than what they would be losing.
For example, the president could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the
military to
use such
force if necessary to protect the homeland in the circumstances like a catastrophic attack like the ones suffered on December 7, 1941, and September 11, 2001.
If the US
military increases its
use of alternative jet and naval fuels that can be produced from coal or various renewable resources, including seed oils, waste oils and algae, there will be no direct benefit to the nation's armed
forces, according to a new RAND Corporation study.
If adopted, the legislation would allow (1) using military force, even if Japan is not attacked, if another nation is attacked and the administration deems this situation a threat to Japan's survival; (2) sending SDF units anywhere in the world where the U.S. or other militaries are waging war and having them provide support in close proximity to combat zones, and (3) deploying the SDF alongside U.S. and other allied forces and authorizing them to fire their weapons ostensibly in defense of their military and other supplie
If adopted, the legislation would allow (1)
using military force, even
if Japan is not attacked, if another nation is attacked and the administration deems this situation a threat to Japan's survival; (2) sending SDF units anywhere in the world where the U.S. or other militaries are waging war and having them provide support in close proximity to combat zones, and (3) deploying the SDF alongside U.S. and other allied forces and authorizing them to fire their weapons ostensibly in defense of their military and other supplie
if Japan is not attacked,
if another nation is attacked and the administration deems this situation a threat to Japan's survival; (2) sending SDF units anywhere in the world where the U.S. or other militaries are waging war and having them provide support in close proximity to combat zones, and (3) deploying the SDF alongside U.S. and other allied forces and authorizing them to fire their weapons ostensibly in defense of their military and other supplie
if another nation is attacked and the administration deems this situation a threat to Japan's survival; (2) sending SDF units anywhere in the world where the U.S. or other
militaries are waging war and having them provide support in close proximity to combat zones, and (3) deploying the SDF alongside U.S. and other allied
forces and authorizing them to fire their weapons ostensibly in defense of their
military and other supplies.
As
used in this paragraph, a «Covered Borrower» means any person who, at the time such person becomes obligated on a loan transaction or establishes an account for consumer credit, satisfies the requirements under any one or more of the following classifications, or is otherwise under applicable laws deemed to be a «Covered Borrower» under the
Military Lending Act, 10 U.S. Code Section 987: (a) An active duty member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force or Coast Guard, or a person serving on active Guard and Reserve duty (a person described in this clause (a) of the definition of «Covered Borrower» is hereinafter referred to as a «Service Member»); or (b) Any of the following persons, relative to a Service Member: (1) The spouse; (2) A child under the age of 21; or (3) If dependent on the Service Member for more than one half of such person's support, any one or more of the following persons: (i) A child under the age of 23 enrolled in a full time course of study at an institution of higher learning; (ii) A child of any age incapable of self support due to a mental or physical incapacity that occurred before attaining age 23 while such person was dependent on the Service Member; (iii) Any unmarried person placed in legal custody of the Service Member who resides with such Service Member unless separated by military service or to receive institutional care or under other circumstances covered by Regulation; or (iv) A parent or parent - in - law residing in the Service Member's ho
Military Lending Act, 10 U.S. Code Section 987: (a) An active duty member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air
Force or Coast Guard, or a person serving on active Guard and Reserve duty (a person described in this clause (a) of the definition of «Covered Borrower» is hereinafter referred to as a «Service Member»); or (b) Any of the following persons, relative to a Service Member: (1) The spouse; (2) A child under the age of 21; or (3)
If dependent on the Service Member for more than one half of such person's support, any one or more of the following persons: (i) A child under the age of 23 enrolled in a full time course of study at an institution of higher learning; (ii) A child of any age incapable of self support due to a mental or physical incapacity that occurred before attaining age 23 while such person was dependent on the Service Member; (iii) Any unmarried person placed in legal custody of the Service Member who resides with such Service Member unless separated by
military service or to receive institutional care or under other circumstances covered by Regulation; or (iv) A parent or parent - in - law residing in the Service Member's ho
military service or to receive institutional care or under other circumstances covered by Regulation; or (iv) A parent or parent - in - law residing in the Service Member's household.
If you have not served in the
military, or have not been married to a person who served in the Armed
Forces or National Guard or Reserves, you can not
use the VA mortgage loan for your upcoming home purchase.
If the US
military increases its
use of alternative jet and naval fuels that can be produced from coal or various renewable resources, including seed oils, waste oils and algae, there will be no direct benefit to the nation's armed
forces, according to a new RAND Corporation study.
A covered entity may
use and disclose the protected health information of individuals who are Armed
Forces personnel for activities deemed necessary by appropriate
military command authorities to assure the proper execution of the
military mission,
if the appropriate
military authority has published by notice in the Federal Register the following information:
If you are a member of the armed
forces or are separated / discharged from
military services, we may
use and disclose health information about you as required by
military command authorities or the Department of Veterans Affairs as may be applicable.