As renewables like wind and solar approach 30 per cent grid penetration, operators will need to increase the flexibility of their grids
using natural gas generation, manage up to 2...
In the UK, carbon pricing — charging those who emit carbon dioxide — has become much stronger in recent years, making it more profitable for power companies to
use natural gas generation rather than coal.
Not exact matches
This
gas, composed mostly of methane, can be
used as a fuel for power
generation (replacing diesel generators), compressed or sold into the
natural gas grid.
This year, for the first time ever,
natural gas has surpassed coal in
use for power
generation in the United States.
Power
generation accounts for 32 percent of U.S.
natural -
gas use, according to the Energy Information Administration.
Stricter emissions requirements on coal - fired power plants, together with low
natural gas prices, have contributed to a recent decline in the
use of coal for electricity
generation in the United States, she said.
In the United States, the
use of
natural gas for electricity
generation continues to grow.
They made comparisons within the five sectors they studied — power plants, furnaces, exports for electricity
generation overseas, buses and cars — and across sectors to see which
use of
natural gas pays the greatest dividend for reducing greenhouse
gas emissions.
As electricity
use spikes across the country in the summertime when more people
use air conditioning, electric power companies turn to more coal and
natural gas power plants to help meet the demand, reducing renewables» share of total U.S. power
generation, Comstock said.
«Consequently, the [United States] is importing decreasing amounts of these two fossil fuels, while
using rising levels of its
natural gas for power
generation,» the report states.
«With increasing shale
gas fracking and many countries» interest in displacing coal
generation with
natural gas due to the lower greenhouse
gas emissions,
natural gas use seems well poised to grow,» the report states.
December 8, 2017 India's steel industry, like America's, is dominated by electric - based processes November 20, 2017 Link between growth in economic activity and electricity
use is changing around the world November 16, 2017 Growth in global energy - related carbon dioxide emissions expected to slow November 8, 2017 EIA forecasts growth in world nuclear electricity capacity, led by non-OECD countries October 25, 2017 China leads the growth in projected global
natural gas consumption October 10, 2017 Buildings energy consumption in India is expected to increase faster than in other regions October 4, 2017 Global
gas - to - liquids growth is dominated by two projects in South Africa and Uzbekistan September 27, 2017 Chinese coal - fired electricity
generation expected to flatten as mix shifts to renewables September 19, 2017 Beyond China and India, energy consumption in non-OECD Asia continues to grow September 14, 2017 EIA projects 28 % increase in world energy
use by 2040
This could provide a way to continue to
use coal and
natural gas for power
generation with reduced emissions, an 80 to 90 % cut according to your link.
Natural Gas — Expensive, and best
used for peak power
generation and vehicle fuel.
Communities must decide whether the carbon - reducing benefit of
using natural gas in power
generation outweighs the fear of new drilling technologies.
And in Japan, the quick suspension of nuclear power
generation after the Fukushima disaster led to more
natural gas and oil
use, pushing emissions up 1 percent to 336 million tons in 2012.
Increased
use of
natural gas across the country is the main reason U.S. carbon emissions from power
generation are at 25 - year lows.
In California,
natural gas - fired capacity is often
used to help offset lower levels of
generation from hydropower facilities.
The decline in coal - related emissions is due mainly to utilities
using less coal for electricity
generation as they burned more low - priced
natural gas.
And the carbon footprint per mile of driving an electric car declines every time the grid gets cleaner, whether from adding renewable energy sources or replacing a coal - fired
generation plant with one
using natural gas.
While generators
used more
natural gas for electricity
generation, overall CO2 emissions from
natural gas were down because of lower
gas heating demand this winter when temperatures were significantly above the historical average for the season.
Clearly, there is more information to be gathered about the environmental impact of extracting
natural gas and
using it for electricity
generation, and I look forward to the conclusion of a currently running EPA study to fill in some of the gaps in our knowledge.
Power sector CO2 emissions declined by 363 million metric tons between 2005 and 2013, due to a decline in coal's
generation share and growing
use of
natural gas and renewables, but the CO2 emissions are projected to change only modestly from 2013 through 2040 in the 3 baseline cases
used in this report.
Their study found that preproduction emissions «are not substantial contributors to the life cycle estimates» — making Marcellus Shale
gas essentially the same as conventional
natural gas, which emits about 50 percent fewer emissions than coal when
used for power
generation.
Wider
use of
natural gas in electricity
generation is a key reason.
When the proposed rule is modeled
using the HOGR case as the baseline,
natural gas plays a larger role in compliance, with the
natural gas - fired share of total
generation rising to 37 % in 2020 and 44 % in 2030.
The future certainly includes point of
use solar, CHP
natural gas, and fuel cell power
generation.
Compared to coal, the
use of
natural gas for power
generation emits 50 percent fewer emissions of carbon dioxide, and even more substantial reductions in traditional air pollutants.
Last year the Energy Information Administration noted that the «decline in coal - related emissions is due mainly to utilities
using less coal for electricity
generation as they burned more low - priced
natural gas.»
The ad's message is as clear as America's air: Thanks to increasing
use of clean, affordable
natural gas, U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide from electricity
generation — a major source of the greenhouse
gas — are at their lowest level in 25 years.
Key factors likely contributing to increased
natural gas spot trading in the Marcellus area include: rapid increases in Marcellus shale
gas production; direct deliveries of Wyoming
gas to the Ohio / Pennsylvania border through the Rockies Express Pipeline; and increased
use of
natural gas for power
generation.
Here we apply such a method
using near surface air temperature observations over the 1851 — 2010 period, historical simulations of the response to changing greenhouse
gases, aerosols and
natural forcings, and simulations of future climate change under the Representative Concentration Pathways from the second
generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2).
The fact is that even while production has significantly increased, total criteria air pollutants and greenhouse
gas emissions have fallen simultaneously, in large part due to industry's commitment to environmental protection and the expanded
use of abundant, affordable
natural gas in electricity
generation.
A U.S. Energy Department study found that liquefied
natural gas from the U.S.,
used for power
generation in Asia and Europe, will emit fewer greenhouse
gas emissions from a lifecycle perspective than electricity generated by regional coal.
And due primarily to greater
use of
natural gas, 2016 carbon dioxide emissions from power
generation were at nearly 30 - year lows.
Thanks to America's energy revolution, the broad availability of
natural gas and its increasing
use in the power -
generation sector also is playing a significant role, helping to reduce power
generation - related emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) to nearly 30 - year lows.
As for emissions, levels of carbon dioxide associated with electricity
generation are near 30 - year lows, primarily because of increased
use of cleaner - burning
natural gas.
Use of local renewable energy resources to displace coal, diesel and
natural gas thermal power
generation
The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) tells us that in 2016, carbon emissions from electricity
generation were at their lowest point in nearly 30 years; this is due largely to greater
use of
natural gas
«From a read of the executive summary, there are recommendations throughout that could affect how
natural gas is produced and
used, potentially impacting the many benefits it brings to our nation for power
generation, transportation, and manufacturing,» said Amy Farrell, ANGA's vice president of market development.
Unlike the growth of
natural gas - fired
generation, which has largely been market - driven, increased
use of nonhydro renewables has largely been driven by a combination of state and federal policies.
U.S. carbon emissions from power
generation are now at nearly 30 - year lows due to increased
use of
natural gas.
Greater
use of
natural gas in power
generation will also reduce NOx, SO2, PM, acid
gasses, Hg and non-Hg heavy metal emissions.
Thanks to increased
use of
natural gas, U.S. energy related emissions of CO2 from power
generation are at their lowest point in nearly 30 years.13 The environmental benefits associated with
natural gas go well beyond CO2 reductions.
CO2 emissions from power
generation in 2016 were near 30 - year lows, in large part due to greater
use of
natural gas.3 And increased
use of
natural gas in the power
generation sector has helped to reduce total CO2 emissions to their lowest level in nearly 25 years.4 This proves that Americans do not have to make the false choice between utilizing our nation's energy resources and protecting the environment.
Making those assumptions then means that the CO2 reductions directly due to RGGI should be the savings of 76.1 million mmBtu of
generation from
natural gas specifically and the
natural gas emission factor for CO2 should be
used for CO2 displacement.
The March 2016 STEO expects that the combination of market forces and government policies will continue to stimulate the
use of
natural gas and nonhydro renewables for power
generation.
First, with or without a new pipeline, existing laws and regulations will cumulatively require New England's
use of
natural gas for electric
generation to decrease by 27 percent by 2023, relative to 2015 levels.
In 2014, researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found that the increased
use of
natural gas combined cycles in power
generation has led to 40 percent less nitrogen oxide emissions and 44 percent less sulfur oxides emissions since 1997.
The decline in
natural gas use for electric
generation indicates that even existing
gas pipelines may operate under capacity and that ANE — or other new pipeline infrastructure — will not be needed to supply either electric generators or
gas heating customers.