Sentences with phrase «using predictive coding»

Great starting point for lawyers who are hesitant to embrace the idea of using predictive coding!

The software can then automatically categorize new documents as the project progresses, using predictive coding (aka technology - assisted review).

You can learn much more about using predictive coding beyond litigation by watching Exterro's on - demand webcast, «Practical Predictive Coding.»

The D4 team attending #LTNY14 recaps key topics everyone was talking about on Day 1 - BIG data, using predictive coding / predictive analytics for information governance and corporate compliance, coordination in order to save costs and more.

Using predictive coding in conjunction with traditional e-discovery methods, we can review large document caches more quickly and accurately, while dramatically reducing litigation costs.

Using predictive coding / technology assisted review / whatever it is called, is faster, more accurate and a heck of a lot cheaper than human review.

Efficiencies can be provided in many ways, including by retaining an expert to handle the forensic collection, agreeing on search terms with counsel to limit the data collected, using predictive coding, and reviewing documents in a hosted review tool.

The cost of manually reviewing the full document collection would be «unreasonably» high given the lower cost estimates of using predictive coding;

The case is valued in the tens of millions of pounds, so the cost of using predictive coding software is proportionate;

In what is being labelled a victory for proportionality, in the case of Pyrrho Investments v MWB Property, Master Matthews found that, given the three million - plus documents identified for review in the case, using predictive coding would be far preferable to undertaking a manual review.

There is a steep, expensive learning curve involved; many mid-sized law firms probably will not profit and even very large cases only save an average of 15 % using predictive coding.

This installment, written by Ralph Losey, explains the e-Discovery Team's latest enhancements to electronic document review using Predictive Coding.

During an interview with Law Technology News, Tom Groom discusses how using predictive coding or technology assisted review (TAR) «can be an incredible cost - and time - saver» for legal teams, but it is not «an easy button.»

In Kleen Products LLC v. Packaging Corp. of America, Plaintiffs sought to compel the defendants to redo their previous productions using predictive coding technology.

It sought advice from lawyer and e-discovery expert Conor Crowley, who suggested that using predictive coding on the documents would be more effective and efficient.

Clients benefit from efficient e-discovery services; saving costs on large, complex litigation cases by using predictive coding.

It was an informative gathering with lively roundtable discussions amongst peers on interesting e-discovery topics such as: judges ordering the use of predictive coding, indexing data by concepts, the practicality of co-operation and disclosure of predictive coding to opposing counsel, whether it's possible to conduct privilege reviews using predictive coding and even securing executive buy - in for «spring cleaning» data remediation projects.

Pursuant to the legal authorities which I have cited supra, and with particular reference to the albeit limited Irish jurisprudence on the topic, I am satisfied that, provided the process has sufficient transparency, Technology Assisted Review using predictive coding discharges a party's discovery obligations under Order 31, rule 12.

For instance, in «Document Review», a lot of time is to be saved in reviewing by using predictive coding, but some of the gains must be reinvested in classifying an appropriate sample and in training the system.

This was the first time this client had used predictive coding, and illustrates how it can benefit any size matter when applied strategically.

In an era where it's still a challenge to get lawyers to use technology like keyword searching, Nelson says it's a big leap of faith to ask them to use predictive coding, which can add layers of complexity to the process from a technology perspective.

Where, as here, petitioners reasonably request to use predictive coding to conserve time and expense, and represent to the Court that they will retain electronic discovery experts to meet with respondent's counsel or his experts to conduct a search acceptable to respondent, we see no reason petitioners should not be allowed to use predictive coding to respond to respondent's discovery request.

In this case he uses predictive coding to weed out unnecessary data and nearlines it for potential later need.

Many lawyers have used predictive coding for years.

88 percent of firms polled now also use predictive coding to cull large data sets and 68 percent of these rated their experience with it as six or higher on a scale of one to ten.

«Legal teams are eager to use predictive coding and reduce the overall cost of e-discovery, but they will only do it if it's defensible,» said Barry Murphy, founder of the e-Discovery Journal.

Firms have begun to use predictive coding to perform particular aspects of pretrial document review, primarily electronic discovery.

It is, however, consistent with Judge Peck's continuing theme that where both parties wish to use predictive coding, there is no reason for courts to interfere or dissuade them.

Lawyers have become somewhat comfortable with the notion that they can use predictive coding in eDiscovery when it best serves the interests of their clients.

The latest Hybrid Multimodal method to use predictive coding will be explained, along with the primary errors of the Predictive Coding 1.0 and 2.0.

In fact, in FTI's 2015 Advice from Counsel Survey, 42 % of corporate respondents said they had never used predictive coding.

He uses predictive coding to learn human behaviour, then applies this to what he learns and assimilates feedback to learn from what he does.

Not exact matches

Likewise, for cases that involve a mix of hard copy documents and electronic documents, it is better to deal with the hard copy documents manually, and use some form of predictive coding on the electronic documents to balance the manual work with a highly efficient approach for the digital portion.

Predictive coding, referred to by Judge Peck as «TAR» (technology - assisted review), is the use of computer algorithms and machine learning to complement document review by lawyers.

On a practical level, Vogl pointed out that many law firms are working with vendors using machine learning and predictive coding for e-discovery.

In Hyles v. New York City, 2016 WL 4077114 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2016), Judge Peck wrote on an issue that has become his trademark - the use of predictive coding in e-discovery.

Judge Peck has released well - known decisions on the topic, including Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe, 287 F.R.D. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) and Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., 306 F.R.D. 125 (S.D.N.Y. 2015), and has been a vocal advocate of expanding the use of predictive coding.

Predictive coding is a term some used, intelligent review.

Second, while there is some belief, including by Judge Peck, that the technology used in predictive coding is «cheaper, more efficient and superior to keyword searching,» id.

I'm going to quickly touch on some key components of using technology - assisted review, or TAR, or predictive coding in some of the interfaces that you may see in your products that you're using today.

NLP and machine learning can be used in technology - assisted review (TAR, or predictive coding) in order to brush through massive data sets for e-discovery.

Progressing from screening for keyword to predictive coding in which algorithms use predictive analytics to determine the most relevant documents based on search

LegalTech's recurring themes, at least for me, of eDiscovery, predictive coding and storing and using information in the cloud are all about content, accessing and delivering content in efficient ways.

In litigation, Nelson explains that predictive coding technology can be used to rank and then «code» or «tag» electronic documents based on criteria such as «relevance» and «privilege» to help reduce time spent on page - by - page lawyer document review.

The bottom line: I don't believe we're anywhere near the Hal 9000 / Space Odyssey scenario or a comprehensive predictive coding process eliminating the use of attorneys during the review.

Seven out of 10 respondents said predictive coding technology will go mainstream if it becomes easier to use, more transparent, and less expensive.

processes needed to supplement the use of predictive coding as part of a defensible legal review workflow; and

Noting that the Tax Court had not previously addressed the issued of technology assisted review tools, Judge Buch concluded that the use of predictive coding in this case would provide a «happy medium» that would address both parties» concerns.

His primary focus in recent months has been on the UX for Lexis DiscoveryIQ, a new eDiscovery enterprise software platform from LexisNexis that reimagines how and when predictive coding is used in the workflow.

Gibson and Calla finish by discussing other data storage innovations they each use to reduce costs including reformatting, predictive coding, and automatic redactions.