Sentences with phrase «using stats»

Why would you recommend using stats the President of CREA herself has been told by the entire legal team at CREA to never let pass her lips??

If you are not at this office is your Broker Owner stopping REALTRON from using your stats against you??

Responsible for problem determination and performance tuning of various application systems using Stats pack, Tkprof, explain plan, SQL trace and hints.

Being able to quantify your abilities by using stats and data, paired with Bachelor's and Master's degrees in relevant fields, will make you a stand - out candidate.

Using stats on your resume helps to show that you are results - oriented.

Yes, I've been limited to using stats boxes on my sites too.

Dr. Curry — You might add a bit more to the asthma portion — using stats from Los Angeles (the best studied city vs. air pollution).

Also, you can check the eigenvalues and variance inflation factors using your stats program.

We've gathered together a handy list of the most popular esports of 2018 so far, using stats collected in this study by esports Bets, as well as figures from Twitch

For this graph, I'm using the Stats Report.

Obtain written consent for quotes and cite sources if you're using stats or facts.

Aldeman: Weingarten is right that many Americans don't have sufficient retirement savings, but she's using those stats here in misleading ways.

Using the stats from Marvel's mightiest»90s trading cards, we've put together the definitive list of the 616's fastest heroes.

Avoid this cost pitfall by using the stats here, as well as not buying 20 of the same diaper.

I also developed new forms of statistical analysis, such as final third efficiency and chance quality, and I also had a crack at assessing which team won a tactical battle by using stats.

So using these stats, giroud is actually slightly better than kane and vardy.

Three - fourths is a heckuva majority, and some of those people are using stats as a part of their argument.

But if he had started on a low people would be using those stats to bash him and call him not fit to wear the Arsenal Jersey.

thank you for finally using stats.

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

The guy has not improved at all, as so many of you love using stats you will find that he is still averaging what he was at United, never scored more than 10 goals in a season.

If you are using stats you could argue that Ospina is the best keeper.

Not able to watch the match and just using stats from cash out on sky sports, looks like we are dominating is that the case?

I just don't know why people think Ox has been useless for all these six seasons.The only season where he was real bad was 15/16 where Wenger stifled his progress.Apart from that season he's always been injury plagued causing him to have some bad performances.He's had many good matches but it was just injuries which slowed him down.I also advice people to stop using stats to judge him.We've had a lot of statiscally useless players who have been rated and are still being rated by Arsenal fans.All Ox lacks is finishing that's all.I don't even think he's improved like many people say.His dribbling and crossing was always good.His finishing has been lacking.He's still the same player I've always known three seasons back yet people are behaving like he's improved massively.

You using stats only in a way to make Giroud look good.

I'm with you there mate.He's an average player and has failed massively.People are also using stats to defend him as if we haven't watched him.I hope they also look at those stats season by season since he came.Look at how as a club we've compromised.He shouldn't have been here in the first place.If he wasn't French he'd have been sold long ago.

As opposed to you who are using only the last few games... I'm using stats to make him look good because last season he was good!!

People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18 goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean lets be honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20 goals in EPL many people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and so on.

Lenders use stats and the stats show that this segment of buyers defaults the least so they are aggressively going after them.

People who are interested in cryptocurrency actively use stats on coinmarketcap and other resources to calculate the gross market value without an inclusion of dead or scam currencies.

Using the STAT Codex, we harnessed the ability to track over 75,000 keywords on a daily basis, meticulously tagged and organized by industry.

Believers like to use stats that are actually not worth much.

I used ur stats and just entered into the calculator.

Analysts and fans with agendas will ALWAYS use stats to support their agenda when they work and will disregard them as meaningless when they don't.

I don't use stats Kev, Giroud is ok and if he had Griezman and Sanchez with him we would compete for the PL, however Evans is Garbage, he only played for Man U when they had inj and is playing left back for West Brom yes the mighty west brom

I just have one request, Can you use stats that have some weight to them?

No one uses those stats but they're great proxies for evaluating especially when taken in conjunction with other info (like W - L record and other adv stats).

No Wilshere is not a guaranteed started in the squad.its all about hardwork which will lead him to developing his full potential.he also should try to stay injury free.he would come god.Jack wilshere used to be so good at 19 years you could start him over Ozil or Cazorla and there would be very little complaint.He was almost undroppable.He danced around players had immense vision he had energy and he had talent.but if he was once able to do it then he can do it.Its funny how people use stats to say we win very little when he is on the pitch.then when he comes out and performs then they hide.Jack Wilshere will be a legendary player for sure.He needs to work hard.

You can't use his stats halfway through one season, to come to an overall conclusion on Simeone.

@kickassfan: You are right — fans only use stats when it «proves» their subjective preferences.

You're very funny bro.Yet why is that upon all these stats why do I get the feeling that if top teams in the world were given the chance to sign only one of an in form Wilshere and in form Walcott both at their best everyone will be going for Wilshere.I keep telling people that even some of the players we rate as world class are useless in so many stats.For example some players you rate over some players might have inferior stats as compared to the ones you don't rate.I'd be happy if people would use stats to.compare players always as you do here instead of using their eyes to judge in some cases and use stats to justify themselves in some cases.

It's the final pool now, which contains Belgium, Algeria, Russia and South Korea, and we have used stats from WhoScored from the 2013/14 season to determine who should be in the team.

We always keep using stat to justify our player so that we does nt feel that inferior when compared to other top club.

«Because stats don't tell the whole story»... I used stats as well, therefore the same criticism applied to my post.

I said I don't use stats to base an opinion of a player entirely.

It's the turn of Group F, which contains Argentina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iran and Nigeria and we have used stats from WhoScored to determine who should be in the team.

Politicians love to use stats in their favor especially from a small sample, not taking in the other factors that tells the complete story.

One always uses stats to suit his own fancy.

Obviously two players in the same position are still going to have different roles in two teams based on what the team needs; that doesn't mean that you can't use stats to evaluate how well a player would adapt into a team along with simply watching their play.

People will deny the fact that Bale is better.They'll use stats to defend Sanchez.Yet when both are in form Bale is clearly better.He can do completely everything Sanchez can do and was naturally blessed with more talent.Of course, he's in Madrid so he's overshadowed a bit.If he came to Arsenal he'd be a big name and be banging them in.