Sentences with phrase «usually come to court»

Such cases usually come to court when doctors and parents disagree.

Not exact matches

Those folks are usually the most aggressive ones once it comes to courts, levies, garnishments, and other unpleasant activities for a borrower.

Plan payments usually come from the debtor's future income and are paid to creditors through the court system and the bankruptcy trustee.

Here's what I've learned: A) when the deposition includes a buyer or seller vs. a Realtor, from day one, the Realtor is usually already way behind in the eyes of the court, B) even if «Mother Theresa» wrote the real estate contract, a good attorney for the plaintiff can generally tear it and her to bits... and that usually comes from the buyer or seller saying, «I don't remember «that» (whatever «that» is) being explained to me»... which brings us to «short sales» and all that go with them and what will surely follow.

Cases like these usually go on for quite some time, but depending on how Atari views the $ 2.2 million Frontier believes they're still owed, it could simply come to a fast conclusion before going to court.

Generally, in those cases, a legislative body has to authorize the appropriation «voluntarily» from whatever source of funds it choses to impose, and usually, when push comes to shove, state and local governments do pay the judgments they owe (there are limited federal bankruptcy options for municipalities and states), although there are instances of state governments stubbornly refusing to take the actions necessary to comply with court orders directing that public schools be funded for many, many years.

You have to deal with clients, court (usually), the office, legal research, creditors, rent & bills, annoying sales people and somehow magically come up with time to market your services so that you can get new clients next month.

Courts usually have sympathy when it comes to long - term employees, especially if the employer is not playing by the rules.

Usually, those terms and conditions are designed to ensure two things: that the accused person will come back to Court when he or she is required to defend the case; and that the accused person will behave while waiting for trial.

Many lawyers and judges appear to take the position that electronic technology in the litigation process is best suited for the large document cases which usually come before the court in large urban areas and are handled by lawyers from large legal firms with IT departments.

Your certificate of completion, that will prove to the court that you have successfully passed a course, will come right to you in the U.S. mail usually within 7 business days.

There are several reasons: (a) it's less adversarial than going to court; (b) it's more private; (c) you retain control of the process — i.e., you are not bound by what the mediator thinks (indeed, most mediators see their role as helping the parties effectuate their goals, not imposing the mediator's ideas); (d) it's usually much less expensive; (e) if there are children involved, the process is less likely to embroil them in a painful conflict; and (f) mediation often gives divorcing couples a better chance of successfully negotiating issues that may come up in the future (such as child support, alimony, or custody and visitation issues).

Mediation through family court services is usually not ordered if the family can come to a legal and fair agreement on their own.

They usually took a year or more to be finalized and then ended up becoming «frequent filers,» coming back to court to fight about anything and everything.

Certainly, there have been all too many, usually young fathers, come to me in states of depression and desperation because they had been denied access or given very limited access to their child because of a divorce and a bad decision made by the courts and our justice system.

Divorce is more than a legal process: Divorce is usually thought of as only a legal process in which couples hire lawyers, may go to court, and come out with a document (some paperwork) that officially ends the marriage in the eyes of the law.

A court's custody decision always comes down to what's in the best interests of the children, so if a parent has a history of drinking too much, judges usually have discretion to consider this.

Here's what I've learned: A) when the deposition includes a buyer or seller vs. a Realtor, from day one, the Realtor is usually already way behind in the eyes of the court, B) even if «Mother Theresa» wrote the real estate contract, a good attorney for the plaintiff can generally tear it and her to bits... and that usually comes from the buyer or seller saying, «I don't remember «that» (whatever «that» is) being explained to me»... which brings us to «short sales» and all that go with them and what will surely follow.