This is
usually in a legal context, such as when one party has filed or threatened to file a lawsuit against another.
Not exact matches
In the narrower legal context, this Hayekian - Rawlsian debate usually manifests itself in arguments about whether the law should protect «negative rights,» that is, protect persons from government encroachment on their inalienable rights — like private property and free exercise of religion, or whether the law should foster «positive rights,» that is, promote the rights of people to receive tangible things like free health care or housing under the auspices of equal treatment under the la
In the narrower
legal context, this Hayekian - Rawlsian debate
usually manifests itself
in arguments about whether the law should protect «negative rights,» that is, protect persons from government encroachment on their inalienable rights — like private property and free exercise of religion, or whether the law should foster «positive rights,» that is, promote the rights of people to receive tangible things like free health care or housing under the auspices of equal treatment under the la
in arguments about whether the law should protect «negative rights,» that is, protect persons from government encroachment on their inalienable rights — like private property and free exercise of religion, or whether the law should foster «positive rights,» that is, promote the rights of people to receive tangible things like free health care or housing under the auspices of equal treatment under the law.
Like the three reports discussed above, and,
in fact, drawing heavily on those reports, the curricular change literature generally takes the position that the case - dialogue method of pedagogy does not sufficiently prepare law students to become practicing lawyers.74 While students learn basic case analysis skills through this method, they are
usually not explicitly taught how to integrate those skills into a larger set of lawyering skills,
in particular those identified as fundamental
in the MacCrate Report.75 Further, while reading and analyzing cases, the focus of most law school classes, are important lawyering skills, they represent only a small portion of what lawyers actually do.76 Consequently, these commentators advocate for teaching
legal skills as they are used
in their real - world
context, not merely as abstract ideas, and for integrating theoretical analysis and practical skills.77
Additionally
in the
legal context, even if English speaking and legally trained, workers
in a foreign country
usually need oversight.
[28] This is not to suggest that a person's general knowledge or understanding of a
legal principle, obtained as the result of
legal advice received
in a different
context, will necessarily or even
usually be sufficient to result
in deemed waiver.
Usually, when we think of outsourcing (or offshoring) to India, it's
in the
context discussed by Ron Friedmann
in this post at Prism
Legal, i.e., where lower level or routinized tasks like document review or billing are performed by overseas workers.
This question
usually comes up
in the
context of e-discovery and whether the tasks performed by document reviewers are
legal work requiring a licence to practise.
In the context of infections it is usually delay in appreciation of the severity of a patient's condition or in referral that leads to circumstances in which a patient or their family should seek recompense through legal actio
In the
context of infections it is
usually delay
in appreciation of the severity of a patient's condition or in referral that leads to circumstances in which a patient or their family should seek recompense through legal actio
in appreciation of the severity of a patient's condition or
in referral that leads to circumstances in which a patient or their family should seek recompense through legal actio
in referral that leads to circumstances
in which a patient or their family should seek recompense through legal actio
in which a patient or their family should seek recompense through
legal action.
In the legal field, we usually think of this term in the e-discovery contex
In the
legal field, we
usually think of this term
in the e-discovery contex
in the e-discovery
context.
This Comment joins other work
in arguing that the legitimacy of stare decisis depends upon widespread publication.4 The doctrine of stare decisis itself emerged only with the consistent and reliable publication of court opinions, 5 and
legal processes that do not result
in the issuance of publicly available opinions, such as settlements and arbitrations, generally lack stare decisis norms altogether.6 Although previous scholarship has discussed the proper role of stare decisis
in the
context of «unpublished» opinions, 7 which make up around eighty percent of all United States courts of appeals opinions8 (and are
usually publicly available despite their name), 9 this Comment provides the first examination of the tenability of stare decisis as applied to truly secret opinions like those of the FISC.
Of course, that very question has preoccupied lawyers and
legal scholars alike for two decades with regard to IT law, i.e. whether it should be treated as a subject
in and of itself (
in which case it
usually isn't a mandatory class, meaning that students can go through law school without hearing the word «Internet»
in a
legal context), or if the digital medium should simply be addressed
in basic textbooks and general courses and classes.
You've seen plenty of references to the decline of traditional news media here,
usually in the
context of similar struggles
in the
legal marketplace.