Sentences with phrase «uterine rupture did»

Few studies regarding twins have been completed, but in two small studies with only 45 women, the rates of successful VBAC and uterine rupture did not differ significantly between study subjects and women with singleton gestations also attempting VBAC (ACOG, 2004).

A study published in the Dec. 2015 issue of Birth showed that, although Home Births After Cesarean (HBAC) have high success rates, when a uterine rupture does occur, perinatal death is more likely.

Not exact matches

Not once did I think about my previous cesarean or the scar it left me or the possibility or uterine rupture.

That DOES N'T mean it is unsafe or can not be used by pregnant women and has nothing to do with the risk of uterine rupture.

Studies and stats on uterine rupture: Birth Without Fear — 20 Peer Reviewed Publications on Uterine Rupture Medscape Reference — Uterine rupture rates American Pregnancy VBAC.com — What is Uterine Rupture and How often does iuterine rupture: Birth Without Fear — 20 Peer Reviewed Publications on Uterine Rupture Medscape Reference — Uterine rupture rates American Pregnancy VBAC.com — What is Uterine Rupture and How often does irupture: Birth Without Fear — 20 Peer Reviewed Publications on Uterine Rupture Medscape Reference — Uterine rupture rates American Pregnancy VBAC.com — What is Uterine Rupture and How often does iUterine Rupture Medscape Reference — Uterine rupture rates American Pregnancy VBAC.com — What is Uterine Rupture and How often does iRupture Medscape Reference — Uterine rupture rates American Pregnancy VBAC.com — What is Uterine Rupture and How often does iUterine rupture rates American Pregnancy VBAC.com — What is Uterine Rupture and How often does irupture rates American Pregnancy VBAC.com — What is Uterine Rupture and How often does iUterine Rupture and How often does iRupture and How often does it occur

I scoured the Internet for data and stories on VBACs, other women's success or failure stories of doing them at home, and what the risk of uterine rupture was all about.

No, I'm not confusing facts... a uterine rupture can occur DURING a c - section, and I never said that MORE occured, just that statistically the risk of rupture is higher (mainly because as you have more c - sections the scarred area and tissue surrounding it gets weaker) and even that fact aside, there are plenty of other risks with c - section that I know many moms who were never informed of them when considering a repeat c vs a vbac, but were certainly informed of the risks of the vbac... that has nothing to do with c - sections being more convenient and more costly though.

«a c section carries the risk of uterine rupture» uhhh does the uterus sense the scalpel coming towards it and spontaneously rupture out of fear of a big scary sharp knife?

I am fed up with the VBAC whining, hereby I suggest the following informed consent, «I, Ms Somebody, am aware that Hospital Somewhere can't offer me a safe VBAC because it doesn't have an anaestaegiologist all around the clock but I insist on having a VBAC anyway and I take full responsibility for the possible uterine rupture and my baby's possible death.»

Uterine rupture is more common when the incision is done in the «classic» up and down direction, as opposed to the more popular side to side «bikini cut» incision.

If the risk of future uterine rupture is unacceptable to you people, then why do you keep advocating for HBACs?

If your ob / gyn says you need a c / sec and you refuse b / c you believe s / he is wrong or you refuse b / c you do not want to risk a uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy, who then takes full unequivocal responsibility for the present birth's outcome?

I had feared this meant a repeat c - section because the OB's office had said they really wouldn't do much in way of induction because of uterine rupture chances.

One observational study comparing induction to expectant management in women with a prior cesarean delivery found that induction of labor was associated with a greater relative risk of uterine rupture, whereas another study did not (104, 105).

These studies also found that women with twin gestations did not incur any greater risk of uterine rupture or maternal or perinatal morbidity than those with a singleton gestation (96, 97).

We just don't have data here to quantify the maternal risks of uterine rupture or other maternal morbidities when women with three or more prior cesareans desire spontaneous labor.

Inducing with drugs, manually stripping the membranes connecting the amniotic sac to the uterine walls, or rupturing the amniotic sac to cause contractions does nt always do the job.

An ECV would have to be done in the OR with an epidural since I was «once a v - bac, always a v - bac» and it carried risks like uterine rupture, placental abruption, fetal distress and other problems.

So the reason why we had to do the C - section, coming back, is because the incision was along the posterior section of the uterus which had kinda weaken the uterus which had her increase her chance of a uterine rupture.

Women who have had many previous births, especially if they were done via cesarean section are at a higher risk of experiencing uterine rupture.