A dirty sock is cast in plaster — taking away
its utilitarianism as well as its soft and fluffy comfort.
The script that Billy Ray has adapted from the Argentine original appears to be re-freshened to take a look at morality and
utilitarianism as it pertains to a post-9 / 11 world.
Certainly not
utilitarianism as most democracies are.
Not exact matches
MacIntyre takes the unity of liberalism, laissez - faire capitalism, Marxism, and
utilitarianism not just
as proof for his science - fiction metaphor, but also
as a pointer to the teleological alternative that is, he believes, the only solution left.
Coleridge, for whom suffering and insight were
as inseparable
as civilization and its discontents were for Freud, abhorred
utilitarianism.
Eric Hoffer would argue that it is not
utilitarianism so much
as America's penchant for activity that lies behind her preoccupation with work.
Utilitarianism is often thought of
as the paradigmatic secular moral theory....
The coming - apart of unholy alliances, such
as that between
utilitarianism and biblical religion, could lead to some new imaginative visions, some alternatives to the ever - increasing dominance of governmental and corporate bureaucracy into which we have fallen.
The fact that
utilitarianism does not involve political or religious convictions, or a list of commandments, appealed to the irreligious Singer, who
as a child had refused to have a Bar Mitzvah ceremony.
At Oxford, where he studied with R. M. Hare, and then
as a professor at Melbourne's Monash University, Singer slightly modified his philosophy into what he calls preference
utilitarianism.
In terms of my account thus far, one might classify Whitehead's ethics
as a modified Benthamite
utilitarianism.
As it says «the economists» most basic problem is anthropological», in other words the subject is based upon a narrow and restrictive concept of rationality which ignores the richness of human relations in favour of an obsolete
utilitarianism.
When one realizes how different Hartshorne's ethics is from that found in deontology
as usually conceived, and when one notices his numerous and repeated criticisms of
utilitarianism, 10 one is then in a position to see how he culls insights from both of these in the effort to develop his own virtue ethics centered around the law of moderation.
The stakes are very high here, for Sandel accepts
as proven the deontological case against
utilitarianism.
In this effort I hope to show that Hartshorne's thought is an improvement with respect to some of the weaker features of virtue ethics
as it has been defended by some recent philosophers, in particular regarding the allegation made by virtue ethnicians that deontology and
utilitarianism are defective because they depend on abstract rules.
The last two decades have witnessed a rebirth of interest in the virtues, an interest which, at a minimum, acts
as a supplement to the familiar alternatives of deontology and
utilitarianism, and, at a maximum, acts
as a substitute for deontology and
utilitarianism.1 1 will not be defending the maximal thesis in this article,
as some in the virtue ethics «movement» have done (e.g., Alasdair MacIntyre and Philippa Foot2).
The
utilitarianism of an individualistic period, which promised men that through faith they might gain the economic virtues and wealth, differs from the pragmatism of our social climate of opinion, in which religion is used
as a means for gaining social order and prosperity; but they are both utilitarian and equally remote from the love of God for his own sake and of the individual or social neighbor in his relation to God.
Above all, this means a change in the meaning of work, a lessening of its pure
utilitarianism, a recovery of the idea of work
as a calling.
Although that might appear to be a conclusion of mere practical reason, first reached by the so - called Enlightenment, there is also a case to be made for it in terms of biblical Christianity
as well
as «natural law» or secular
utilitarianism.
Although many concur in categorizing any ethical system based on process metaphysics
as teleological or consequentialist, recent writings have gone beyond this, attempting to demonstrate the affinity between process ethics and
utilitarianism.
Under the rising criticism of
utilitarianism, first in the late 18th century and then with ever greater insistence in the 19th and 20th centuries, freedom came to mean freedom to pursue self - interest, latterly defined
as «freedom to do your own thing.»
The complex of capitalism,
utilitarianism, and science
as a cultural form has its own world view, its own «religion» even — though it is an adamantly this - worldly one — and its own utopianism: the utopianism of total technical control, of course in the service of the «freedom» of individual self - interest.
As between his own happiness and that of others, utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial as a disinterested and benevolent spectato
As between his own happiness and that of others,
utilitarianism requires him to be
as strictly impartial as a disinterested and benevolent spectato
as strictly impartial
as a disinterested and benevolent spectato
as a disinterested and benevolent spectator.
There Mill argues that the primary source of
utilitarianism's strength
as a guide to action (its «ultimate sanction») is to be found in «the social feelings of mankind — the desire to be in unity with our fellow creatures» (U 40).
As Fr Dylan James brings out later in this issue, the justification of «human rights» today is less and less grounded on the objective nature of Man and more and more on the shifting sands of
utilitarianism.
Fellow Conservative John Hayes was just
as complimentary, praising the United States» 44th president for his commitment to the «politics of hope» rather than the «dull
utilitarianism» commonplace to politics.
This system is also known
as «
utilitarianism».
Again, they looked at the results using two social objectives: increasing the number of people who are happy, which they call «total
utilitarianism,» or increasing the average happiness of people, known
as «average
utilitarianism.»
It seems
as though any attempt to escape arbitrary social rules via
utilitarianism eventually runs smack into a set of somewhat biased and arbitrary social rules that must be implemented in order to measure and compare the utility of different groups of people.
And I guess I'm «biast» because, in the battle between deontology and
utilitarianism, I find the latter much more convincing — and I absolutely hate to see it
as misrepresented
as it is here in Thanos.
Introduces «Rule
Utilitarianism»
as well
as the notions of higher and lower pleasure and allows students to compare the «Principle of Utility» with the «Greatest Happiness Principle».
The aim of this module is to: - Introduce
utilitarianism and deontology to students - Foster debates about the nature of morality
as well
as specific moral issues.
As the last stylistic holdout of Land Rover's rectilinear school of design that defined its previous - generation models, the old LR4 stood out thanks to its upright
utilitarianism, a style that somehow managed to be both honest and premium.
Unfortunately, this essay in fact discusses only one part of
utilitarianism or Benthamism
as a complete system of thought or doctrine — and chooses to discuss (both defend and revise or amend) that part in which the system is weakest and least useful.
Going back to
Utilitarianism, I often tell authors it's OK to buy cheap reviews on Fiverr.com
as long
as you ask them to be honest and balanced (not gushing).
In the book, Rawls uses decision theory
as a framework for marrying
utilitarianism (ends) and Kantianism (not means but principles governing means).
As for my assertion that rehabilitation is a primary objective of our justice system: the primary support for this proposition is one of basic
utilitarianism.
Its
utilitarianism is an advantage in a few ways: it's more comfortable to wear,
as the built - in rubber strap is more flexible and arguably looks better on the wrist.