Charles Reynolds, in his article, «Somatic Ethics: Joy and Adventure in the Embodied Moral Life,» is more accurate in claiming that an ethics based on process metaphysics «avoids the beguiling trap of
utilitarianism for an ideal participant perspective» (SE 127, my emphasis).
Not exact matches
MacIntyre takes the unity of liberalism, laissez - faire capitalism, Marxism, and
utilitarianism not just as proof
for his science - fiction metaphor, but also as a pointer to the teleological alternative that is, he believes, the only solution left.
Coleridge,
for whom suffering and insight were as inseparable as civilization and its discontents were
for Freud, abhorred
utilitarianism.
Eric Hoffer would argue that it is not
utilitarianism so much as America's penchant
for activity that lies behind her preoccupation with work.
For though the sphere of culture Itself belongs partly to the realm of truth, beauty and holiness which ultimately has no need to defend itself before the court of
utilitarianism, faith and its object transcend even these good things.
Pantheism's error is obvious; anthropocentrism degenerates into
utilitarianism by reducing God's creation to nothing more than a tool
for satiating man's desires.
Utilitarianism in his versatile usage becomes a synonym
for natural law in one place and a description of rational argument in another.
The stakes are very high here,
for Sandel accepts as proven the deontological case against
utilitarianism.
What she wants above all is to formulate a philosophical and political justification
for Dickens» repudiation of Benthamite
utilitarianism, and his replacement of it with an imaginative sympathy
for others.
The last two decades have witnessed a rebirth of interest in the virtues, an interest which, at a minimum, acts as a supplement to the familiar alternatives of deontology and
utilitarianism, and, at a maximum, acts as a substitute
for deontology and
utilitarianism.1 1 will not be defending the maximal thesis in this article, as some in the virtue ethics «movement» have done (e.g., Alasdair MacIntyre and Philippa Foot2).
Consider,
for example, the secular ethic of
utilitarianism, which holds that the morally right action is always the one that brings about the greatest possible total happiness.
There is little basis in history
for the promise that this religion sincerely followed will bring fullness of life to its adherents in the sense that theological
utilitarianism intends.
One can also easily understand why religious
utilitarianism in our time should be dominantly social, since our greatest concern is
for the preservation and ordering of a social life that is threatened with anarchy and since our greatest sufferings arise out of our social disorder.
If there is not much ground in history
for the assurances of theological
utilitarianism, there seems to be less ground in the structure of the faith itself.
The
utilitarianism of an individualistic period, which promised men that through faith they might gain the economic virtues and wealth, differs from the pragmatism of our social climate of opinion, in which religion is used as a means
for gaining social order and prosperity; but they are both utilitarian and equally remote from the love of God
for his own sake and of the individual or social neighbor in his relation to God.
Utilitarianism seems to mark not only the attitude of the political powers that use religion
for the sake of social control and transform it to suit their purposes, but also the attitude of many who oppose them.
Although that might appear to be a conclusion of mere practical reason, first reached by the so - called Enlightenment, there is also a case to be made
for it in terms of biblical Christianity as well as «natural law» or secular
utilitarianism.
Unless there really is moral obligation, it will not be a form of natural law, and unless the immediate ground
for that obligation is the metaphysical structure that makes a being human, the theory in question will not amount to natural law but an ethics of some other sort, whether divine command, Kantian deontology,
utilitarianism, or something else.
The one is committed to community and the ideal of self - sacrifice
for the greater good of the commonweal, the other is committed to
utilitarianism and to the development of technology
for the purpose of instantly gratifying the needs of the individual.
For utilitarianism it meant the freedom to pursue one's own ends.
Mill uses a distinction between «higher» and «lower» pleasures to respond to the criticism that
utilitarianism can not account
for the moral significance of the differences between human beings and (other) animals.
Mill himself recognized some degree of tension between justice and utility,
for the entire final chapter of
Utilitarianism is devoted to an attempt to clarify the relationship between the two concepts.
Fellow Conservative John Hayes was just as complimentary, praising the United States» 44th president
for his commitment to the «politics of hope» rather than the «dull
utilitarianism» commonplace to politics.
Mary Wollstonecraft and William GodwinMary was one of the founders of the feminist movement - arguing
for a future where men and women were treated equally - while Godwin was the founder of philosophical anarchism, or
utilitarianism.
I lost that debate and
for a while thought
utilitarianism itself might be wrong.»
She reviewed all the philosophical possibilities — including
utilitarianism, which promotes the «greatest good
for the greatest number,» principlism, and virtue theory, which are often taught in medical schools.
A lesson suitable
for GCSE or A-level to introduce John Stuart Mill's development of Jeremy Bentham's concept of
Utilitarianism.
A lesson suitable
for GCSE or A-level to introduce Jeremy Bentham's Act
Utilitarianism.
A medium - term scheme of work covering an introduction to morality and ethics and examining the
Utilitarianism of Bentham and Mill in a comprehensive overview, suitable
for GCSE or A-level Religious Studies.
The lesson gives a comprehensive introduction to action based
Utilitarianism and includes several moral dilemmas
for students to apply to the theory.
Of course, you are out of step because simple
utilitarianism and acting
for the greater good are all the rage these days.
In the book, Rawls uses decision theory as a framework
for marrying
utilitarianism (ends) and Kantianism (not means but principles governing means).
As
for my assertion that rehabilitation is a primary objective of our justice system: the primary support
for this proposition is one of basic
utilitarianism.
He helped evolve smartphone design beyond mere
utilitarianism, and
for that he deserves our appreciation.