Sentences with phrase «v. federal trade»

NAR, along with several other nonprofit professional associations, filed an amicus brief (friend of the court brief) with the U.S. Supreme Court in California Dental Association v. Federal Trade Commission.

Avvo General Counsel Josh King on the Supreme Court's decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission: The court made no bones about it, siding with the FTC: the regulatory bodies of self - regulated professions (like dentistry and the law) only get immunity from antitrust liability if they are «actively supervised» by -LSB-...]

The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission in which the Board of Dental Examiners took issue with «non-dentists» whitening teeth.

There's precedent for keeping the FTC out of the business of lawyer regulations; back in 2005, the D.C. Circuit held that lawyers were exempt from a privacy notice requirement implemented by the FTC in American Bar Association v. Federal Trade Commission.

Not exact matches

Since Bain v. CTA was originally filed in federal district court in April 2015, the plaintiffs, represented by Gibson Dunn Crutcher, LLP, have traded numerous legal filings with a legion of lawyers representing NEA, AFT, CTA, CFT, UTLA and other interested parties.

2d 192 (D. Mass 1998)(subprime mortgage lender's original fee was unfair and deceptive trade practice and broker not entitled to brokerage fee); Federal Trade Commission v. Gill, 265 F. 3d 944 (9thtrade practice and broker not entitled to brokerage fee); Federal Trade Commission v. Gill, 265 F. 3d 944 (9thTrade Commission v. Gill, 265 F. 3d 944 (9th Cir.

Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchison Co., 92 S. Ct. 898 at 903 (1972), quoting H.R.Conf.

A recent decision Federal Court decision involving the manufacturer of Tupperware, Dart Industries Inc. v. Baker & McKenzie LLP, considered whether trade - mark use occurred when goods are purchased online using flyers.

Polimaster Ltd. and NA&SE Trading Co. Ltd. v. Rae Systems, Inc., District Court, Northern District of California, United States of America, 23 January 2009, C 05 - 1887; Joseph Müller A. G. v. Sigval Bergesen, Federal Tribunal, Switzerland, 26 February 1982; Encyclopedia Universalis S.A. v. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, United States of America, 31 March 2005, 04 -0288-CV.

The Federal Court decision in Thoi Bao Inc. v. 1913075 Ontario Limited involved a former employee of the plaintiff developing and operating a competing online news website that infringed on the plaintiff's trade - marks and copyrighted content.

A post on the TaxProf Blog reports that Professor Flatt and Professor Wells will be speaking at the «Federal Pricing of Carbon: Tax v. Cap and Trade» conference, which takes place today and tomorrow in Houston.