I was being intentionally
vague about the mechanism but certain about the intent and effect, in an effort to concentrate responses on the bullet pointed questions.
Not exact matches
After many years of
vague talk by governments
about fighting global warming, it is encouraging that the debate has finally begun to tackle specific
mechanisms to achieve cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.Â
And with regard to Svensmark's («
vague but false») assertion
about meteorologists and a lack of a
mechanism, I can only presume that arises because all those meteorologists (presumably those that Svensmark was associated with / contacted on the matter — or does he mean all meteorologists?)
Surely the hurdle for cosmic rays should, if anything, be higher as the science behind how greenhouse gases is well understood but the
mechanism (apart from same
vague theories
about cloud seeding) for GCR is not?
And chance is what it is when you have a
vague idea
about a number of inter-related
mechanisms but no concrete value for any of them.