That's a rather
vague description at best, but it's not for what it does that I invested in ASCMA.
Not exact matches
She studied cognitive science and comparative literature
at the University of Georgia before setting out in search of the
vague job
description «learn and explain things.»
Learning to parry is incredibly important for the combat and many of the later boss battles are pretty much impossible if you can't do it consistently, and although the game does feature a tutorial on it it's
description of it is
vague at best and you're given one guy to practice on who barely attacks you in the first place.
Weighing in
at 1.52 GB, the
description is pretty
vague at the moment, preferring to wear its heart on its slave with the statement «Play This Demo».
Perhaps even detain him
at the least for simply fitting a
description with such a
vague amount of information?
I reach this conclusion because a) the initial
description provided was
vague b) Mr. Crane was clear that while there were some similar features between the accused and the perpetrator, he was unable to state definitively that the accused was the person who robbed him c) Mr. Crane confirmed that this was all he meant when he testified
at the preliminary inquiry d) five photographs later, Mr. Crane stated that the ninth photograph was the «closest» (having already seen Mr. V's photograph), and e) there was no other evidence to bolster the qualified identification into an actual identification.