Sentences with phrase «valid an opinion as»

And it raises the question of whether someone who simply played Fallout 4's campaign (without exploring) has any less valid an opinion as someone who just explored post-apocalyptic Boston.

Surely Spencer, being a climate scientist, has just as valid an opinion as that of RC if your criterion is blog worthiness equating to credentialism.

Not exact matches

Romney is a vacuous, two - faced liar who molds his opinions on the fly for the sake of political expediency, who has a long history of outsourcing American jobs overseas, who has lived a life of privilege and demonstrably does not understand that people who actually have to earn a living are just as valid as him and his show horse raising ilk.

That is exactly my point... your «understanding» of Jesus, and Fred Phelps «understanding» of Jesus are equally valid because it is nothing more than an opinion... except it is framed as objective.

Sure her opinion on Catholicism is as valid as anyone else's..

I talked to him before, and said that I respected his opinion but that there were another views just as valid and just as biblical.

Lee: And why should your opinion on the story be accepted as valid any more than any other persons opinion??

Your opinion isn't worth an infestation, and my interpretation is as valid as yours.

He then gives his opinion as to what was valid reason to do so.

Anyone can express an opposing opinion without any support for their opinion ant it be just as valid.

The opinions they have are just as valid as yours.

In the ensuing discussion, there was criticism of my rejection of «the majority opinion of «experts»» as a good or valid method to base my position.

Anyone could say their opinion of truth being about their experience of similar is about being real in their life and it would be as rational and valid as your comment.

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

However, with respect to the first of those issues, I find fascinating the British idea of «virtual representation,» which meant that so long as Parliament was a mixed deliberative body of persons that represented a variety of interests and opinions, then representation was real and valid even though citizens could not vote for members of Parliament.

«Historically, opinion on the appeal to authority has been divided — it has been held to be a valid argument about as often as it has been considered an outright fallacy.»

CA: For the record it does not matter what country I reside in, my opinion is a valid as your opinion is.

It being that opinion is open to all and everything and anyone could make the opposing statement that God does change with it being every bit as valid as what he proposes.

Cq «Why consider the opinions of one man concerning another's divinity as more valid than, say, the people who wrote of the Roman Emperors» divinity?»

Why consider the opinions of one man concerning another's divinity as more valid than, say, the people who wrote of the Roman Emperors» divinity?

You have a perfectly valid opinion though as do I also.

I am of the opinion that Schniderlin is a B2B CM player and until I am shown valid evidence to think otherwise, I will continue to think as such.

His opinions are as valid as a die - hard Arsene Wenger supporter.

I shall leave you to Muffdiver forum as clearly you think yours is the only valid opinion on anything Arsenal.

I believe you have valid reasons behind your convictions and I respect your point of view and decisions as a parent that you've written about here, but you strike me as somewhat dogmatic in your views and your opinions come across like verdicts from above.

When I started to disagree with him, he got angry with me «because his opinion was just as valid as mine.»

It seems a popular notion that once you have read enough material from any source to make up your mind about a topic, you can declare, «I have done my research,» and rest assured that your opinion is at least as valid as anyone else's.

Opinion is valid, as long as it is based on fact.

I think an equally valid opinion would be that «no, if there was actual evidence, it wouldn't be dismissed as typical collaboration».

She also laments a trend on the left and right of shouting down those who hold contrary opinions, and criticises the media for creating a culture whereby only certain groups of people are seen as valid to comment on issues from feminism, Brexit or religion.

Doing this frequently in my training, I received valuable feedback from my advisors as to whether my assessment were valid and constructive, and I learned to frame the response in an appropriate tone (a perhaps unappreciated, yet vital editorial skill is the ability to communicate your opinion clearly).

They judged the same rudely expressed opinions as being more valid, however, when the talking heads had been filmed at a medium distance.

Unanswered questions provoke wonder and fascination, and at least offer the informed lay person the opportunity to develop an opinion every bit as valid as the scientist's.

Although the court ruled that human genetic material is not patentable — there is «no doubt that naturally occurring DNA and RNA as they exist inside the cells of the human body can not be the subject of a valid patent,» Nicholas wrote in his opinion — it concluded that the process of isolating the BRCA1 gene from the human body required human intervention.

Your opinion is just as valid as anybody else's and I'd like to hear it.

If they are here, they are a member of the community, and their opinions are valid so long as they adhere by the community rules and Code of Conduct.

As a co-learner, your personal experiences, ideas, and opinions are just as valid as anyone else'As a co-learner, your personal experiences, ideas, and opinions are just as valid as anyone else'as valid as anyone else'as anyone else's.

Your statements and opinions must be backed up by valid scientific evidence and data from recognized field experts, and your conclusions must point to additional work that might be warranted or new questions and issues that may arise as technology does.

Your vet's «opinion» based on his personal experiences is about as valid as my observations based on my experiences as a critical care nurse.

At least, I hope the points I made throughout my own review were valid as the ultimate goal of any review is to justify and explain the final opinion of the author.

Or maybe not everyone was gushing with praise about Uncharted, and criticisms of the game are just as valid as any other opinion even if they don't align with your own?

And my opinion is just as valid as yours!

If they are here, they are a member of the community, and their opinions are valid so long as they adhere by the community rules and Code of Conduct.

Posting an opinion as an anonymous person, however valid the intellectual reasons, makes your case weaker at best, makes you seem a troll at worst.

«Quality» has many meanings and can be (has been here) linked to «energy», «energy source», «set» (as in SA's original contention), or the implied whole system of power production, so I'm sure there are plenty of valid opinions.

Counting published papers can't be used as a proxy for scientific opinion if you don't know if there's a valid connection.

And that's valid as opinion.

So it is ONLY as an opinion that the «greenhouse platform» can present the «greenhouse effect» and that is not making such to be valid science «Sam», nor is «opinion» a validation of SCIENCE and never has opinion been such.

Richard Alley knows more about glaciers than most 7 year olds, but that does not mean their opinions are not valid, simply not as informed.

has near the certainty as stated and alarmists don't believe that's a valid opinion because we don't have enough letters in front of our names.