Sentences with phrase «valid arguments based»

Do I even have a valid argument based on information I provided?

Not exact matches

I understand the argument is straightforward, but it is: 1) based in definitional fiat (there is equally valid evidence to suggest that god is malevolent or simply apathetic); 2) actually embraces the god says so because it is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) attempts to constrain god by limiting god's possible range of choice.

Basing your arguments on quotes from books you yourself don't seem to understand is as valid as me quoting the back of the cereal box except the back of the cereal box usually has nuggets of truth!

There is no empirical basis for it, yet it is taken by most philosophy academics to be a valid argument.

Truth is a teleological argument for the existence of a supreme intelligent entity is more valid than any argument based on random chance that I have ever heard.

Note that in politics arguments do not always have to be valid; it is often more important that they seem appealing to the own voting base.

Rejection of data based on your anecdotal experience does not constitute a valid argument.

But postmodernists assert that all beliefs of all tribes are equally valid on the basis of this false argument.

Therefore, instead of using «values» arguments, I'd suggest we should stick rigorously to rational economic analyses based on objective, valid information.

That's not proven by studying these papers beyond the observations that their argument lacks all valid basis and is based on explicitly erroneous reasoning.

No answer there, until VTG's partial answer (I'm now not sure it was an answer because of the reference to the paper Judith co-authored, and as has been pointed out, that paper may just be an argument based on certain assumptions that would make my question inapplicable, although the question as to whether Judith's assertion about CO2 / ACO2 «dominance» is in contradiction to Lewis» range of sensitivity may still be a valid question, I think).

Your argument based on lapse rate is only valid to the top of the middle atmosphere and falls apart in the upper atmosphere where temperature increases with altitude.

Confirming an important point conceded by Deputy SG during last Term's oral arguments, the Government's Gall brief states repeatedly that policy disagreements with the Guidelines can be a valid basis for a variance — even though many circuit have held otherwise (like the Tenth Circuit in a split ruling yesterday) and even though many lower court briefs filed by the Government have argued otherwise.

It was not so much that the arguments were not valid but that they had been late in coming and could not be the basis for impugning the decision made at trial.

However, apparently some poeple at least in the US have managed to persuade employers and others to give them married benefits based on their Canadian marriage, so it is helpful to them if there is some argument that the marriage is valid here.