Sentences with phrase «valid arguments for»

But there are some valid arguments for going outside of the Samsung ecosystem to get your wearable fix.

The natural cynacism that I have towards the «establishment» is a result of my experience in other cases — where, I now judge, I was being «sold to» rather than being presented with all of the facts — including valid arguments for the opposing view which may, at the very least, have suggested less certainty.

The alarmists» approach for some years has been to publicly deride the climate skeptics rather than present valid arguments for their so - called «consensus science.»

Well, there's many valid arguments for attacking EA.

There are, of course, valid arguments for both sides of the topic.

... there are valid arguments for why services like Tinder have the opposite effect of... Argument — Victor: I remember our first foray to Ikea together when we'd just started dating.

But, there are valid arguments for why services like Tinder have the opposite effect of these potential consequences, which is why I am undecided.

In the breastfeeding versus formula feeding debate, both sides present valid arguments for the pros, and both sides have their downfalls.

There are valid arguments for and against running Silver Spoon (who, unlike Regret, would have to carry 121 pounds against the colts» 126 pounds) in the Derby, and Whitney intends to weigh all of them with the meticulous care of a Cape Canaveral supervisor before he orders the button pushed.

Hartshorne declares that there are many possible valid arguments for the existence of God, but his writings concentrate on perfecting various forms of neoclassical versions of the traditional «ontological» and «cosmological» proofs.

You say there is no way to investigate, but that is only a valid argument for today because they are all dead.

@Mike, not me, you said: You say there is no way to investigate, but that is only a valid argument for today because they are all dead.

As the Church does not accept sola scriptura as a valid argument for teachings and truth.

In the end his claim that no religious scientist can ever provide a valid argument for their position sounds remarkably like a blind act of faith...

HOWEVER I do think that the concerns over the possibility of heavy metals in some tattoo inks are a very valid argument for waiting until your child is older and having less milk during the day (and / or night).

A more valid argument for the solitary sleeping regimen is that it promotes quieter babies.

To slightly expand (and this could be a valid argument for the EU - comission as well), Germany is closer to Russia than some other member states, it has a history of being a reliable partner that purchases large volumes of gas (largest customer in EU IIRC), therefore it's given the best deal.

Pretty much the only valid argument for introducing a test is to ensure that schools step up their game in teaching the national curriculum requirement.

Thus there is a valid argument for the inclusion of scientific names in these accounts.

This is not a valid argument for saying that a flat or smooth distribution in Y is the most natural or least informative prior.

I find it interesting that Monbiot has utter faith in research financed by Big Oil, though of course no sane human being would believe that the source of funding for research is a valid argument for or against the truth of the findings, would they?

That's a valid argument for some, but most Windows users will have paid for a license for the OS through the purchase of a laptop or desktop PC.

Not exact matches

«There would be valid accounting arguments for the costs of relinquishing that «right» as well.

I've seen some valid arguments made for holding a large percentage of bonds.

Thus Martin concludes, for example, that N. T. Wright's approach to Jesus, which mixes supernaturalism and ordinary biography, is just as historically valid as Sanders's method, which does not deal with miracles or the resurrection — although, paradoxically Martin finds Wright's arguments about the resurrection very unconvincing.

Arguments about no proof of any spiritual matters are another story entirely and for the life of me I don't know why the valid arguments are ignored over the invaArguments about no proof of any spiritual matters are another story entirely and for the life of me I don't know why the valid arguments are ignored over the invaarguments are ignored over the invalid ones.

The amazing appeal of Chateaubriand derives from his ability to turn the privileging of nature (the great innovation at the end of the eighteenth century) into an argument for sacrality, and to legitimize the spheres of the emotional and the aesthetic as valid replacements for those of the rational and the social.

A highly valid argument coming from a socialist; but today it is gospel truth for a great many Christians, indeed for the best and most serious Christians — those who think of Christianity as something more than words and kind sentiments.

My point being that taking a member of the set of all things Jesus never explicitly taught on and positing, if only by implication, that his silence is an endorsement of that thing is not a valid foundation for making a sound argument.

IN all the arguments for and against abortion, the ONLY valid statement made is one of CHOICE.

The traditional churches do not always seem to realize that the premises for sensible argument, which are basic to themselves, are probably neither valid nor comprehensible in the world outside the Church.

«Lewis wrote in a time when, among the educated British public if not among their professional philosophers, there was considerably more agreement than there is now about what constitutes a valid and rational argument for a given case.»

ddeevviinn, you said; «It is in this land of reality that 90 % (in actuality a little less, but for sake of argument we'll use this figure) of the population has determined that the Judeo - Christian God revealed in the biblical literature is valid.»

Although many of McCabe's arguments and conclusions appear idiosyncratic today, for he was committed to a literalistic, moralistic, and perfectionistic evangelical theology, 2 his analysis of foreknowledge and contingency still raises valid issues.

I recognize that, for Apel, the universal criterion of valid substantive prescriptions is simply that they can be redeemed by argument or in moral discourse.

It is in this land of reality that 90 % (in actuality a little less, but for sake of argument we'll use this figure) of the population has determined that the Judeo - Christian God revealed in the biblical literature is valid.

@NAH, can rebut each of Colin's points in a reasonable manner, specifically let me call out two (both sort of related)-- the Christianity refers to only 600 years of history, and only refers to a small geography (not even the entire earth)-- why «leap of faith» argument is valid for Christianity and not for other independent faiths, which have many contradictory beliefs compared to Christianity, and if they are equally valid, how can they all be equally valid

There is ZERO valid logical argument for this thingy «God» that you claim to exist.

I would posit that an argument could be made for the existance of Christianity if Paul had not been invovled as equally valid, therfore this being a moot point.

The necessity I am denying is not that argued for by the ontological argument but, rather, that which must first be argued for to make the argument ultimately valid.

In this paper I shall (1) briefly set forth this argument; (2) show that the argument, if it is valid, is valid only for a Hartshornean God; (3) argue that, since Hartshorne's God does require that at least something (anything will do) contingent exists, the «new» ontological argument fails even for Hartshorne's God, because it is logically possible that there should be nothing at all, total non-being.

A valid and reasonable argument has been made for both positions.

Keynes's argument as to why these two assumptions are required for «valid inductive inference» is crucial for resolving the conflict about the role of the doctrine of internal relations.

Let us reconsider this argument in face of the claim that such postulates as the Keynesian principle of limitation of independent variety constitute adequate grounding for «valid inductive inference».

Because EVERY valid argument that folks have make for redefining marriage for Gays, can equally be used for the legalization of Polygamy (think Sharia Law), and even group marriages.

The fear argument is just silly, for it is just as valid to say that people reject spiritualism and the afterlife for fear of divine punishment.

I know you must be pretty proud of yourself by sounding like your making a valid scientific argument for an all knowing fairy in the sky, but your not.

There is no empirical basis for it, yet it is taken by most philosophy academics to be a valid argument.

Andrew, for your argument to be valid, all knowing has to mean something other than all knowing.

By moving the dates back a bit earlier, you could substi.tute Christianity for Islam and have an equally valid argument.