The SJC disagreed, found the agreement to be
valid at execution, and both fair and reasonable.
Not exact matches
None of the judgements was obeyed and no
valid stay of
execution was obtained by the Police whose operatives and vehicles are permanently stationed
at the premises.
He told the House that, a legal officer who represented the IGP
at public hearing committed perjury, stressing that, «he lied under oath that there was a
valid stay of
execution», but when time was given that he produced a proof of stay, he could not produce any.
-- The prenup is not in writing: For a prenuptial agreement to be
valid, it must be a written document, witnessed by outside parties —
At least one party provided false information: The inclusion of untruthful information or even incomplete information will render a prenuptial agreement invalid — Pressure, duress or coercion: If one party forces the other to sign a prenuptial agreement, regardless of whom the document most benefits, it will be invalid — The prenup was not read: If one or the other spouse does not read the prenuptial agreement, it is possible the document could be challenged — Improper
execution: To be
valid, the agreement must be read and signed by both parties before the marriage occurs — Gross unfairness: While a prenuptial agreement gives the couple a great deal of flexibility in how they establish financial rights, the court may decide not to enforce the prenup if it is grossly unfair to one of the parties