Sentences with phrase «valid claims of»

Through judicial determinations and negotiated settlements, vast tracts of British Columbia's, and likely other provinces», territories will be found to be subject to valid claims of Aboriginal title.

And you struck out this portion you wrote: If the scientists had actually substituted or replaced the tree ring proxy data with instrument data, then McIntyre and Fuller would have a valid claim of fraudulent behavior by Phil Jones et al..

«If the scientists had actually substituted or replaced the tree ring proxy data with instrument data, then McIntyre and Fuller would have a valid claim of fraudulent behavior by Phil Jones et al..

If you believe your lawyer negligently or recklessly represented you in a legal proceeding that resulted in an unfair or unjust outcome, you may have a valid claim of legal malpractice.

This means that if a medical professional did not provide the level of treatment and care that would ordinarily be provided by another professional under the same circumstances, and as a result caused harm to the patient, there may be a valid claim of medical malpractice.

One of these clauses requires the company to co-operate in the future, and that includes the need to disclose to the SFO all material and information in its possession that is not protected by a valid claim of LPP or any other legal protection.

If your insurance company engages in any of the following behaviors, and you are harmed as a result, you may have a valid claim of bad faith:

An author of a children's illustrated book failed to state a valid claim of copyright infringement in her action against a publisher and entertainment agency for their alleged infringement for mirroring the author's story in another publication which adopted the

When the new employer proves such «predisposition,» there can be no valid claim of tortious interference.

We only do so at the request of people who have been convicted, their families, or attorneys who believe they have a valid claim of innocence.

[15] The MEA investigative material, notes, correspondence and working papers which arose between August 9, 2007 and September 13, 2007 inclusive are not subject to a valid claim of litigation privilege; they are ordered to be listed and to be produced to plaintiff's counsel within 14 days.

Not exact matches

I suggest you consider the terms «introversion» and «extroversion» as detrimental to your personal development, keeping you from doing things like Cain did: to succeed at parts of life that an unscientific model shown to be at best poorly valid and poorly reliable claimed you couldn't do.

One of the most common reasons a court will toss a non-compete claims is when the employee did not receive consideration; a non-compete agreement is a contract, and contracts require the exchange of consideration in order to be valid.

Although some of them have since expired, the law allows MTel to claim up to six years» back - payments for infringement that occurred while they were valid.

If we terminate Mr. Drexler's employment without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, Mr. Drexler will be entitled to receive (i) a payment of his earned but unpaid annual base salary through the termination date, any accrued vacation pay and any un-reimbursed expenses, and (ii) subject to Mr. Drexler's execution of a valid general release and waiver of claims against us, as well as his compliance with the non-competition, non-solicitation and confidential information restrictions described below, (a) a payment equal to his annual base salary and target cash incentive award, one - half of such payment to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date and the remaining one - half of such payment to be paid in six equal monthly installments commencing on the first business day of the seventh calendar month following the termination date, (b) a payment equal to the product of (x) the last annual cash incentive award Mr. Drexler received prior to the termination date and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days of service completed by Mr. Drexler in the year of termination and the denominator of which is 365, such amount to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date, and (c) the immediate vesting of such portion of unvested restricted shares and stock options as provided and pursuant to the terms of the relevant grant agreements under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

The requestor may submit directly to MassMutual a valid Order of Protection («Protective Order») or a reasonable request, via phone or writing, stating that disclosure of any policy or claims - related information could endanger the individual or his / her family.

a valid court order of protection issued by a New York State Court and / or a statement that disclosure of claim - related information could endanger the person seeking confidentiality.

You claim the existence of a being for which there isn't a single shred of scientifically valid evidence.

Without this evidencial support, any claim regarding knowledge of that gods» intentions, actions or desires is not valid and must be dismissed as fiction.

Some of the available options elicit from us, if not a rationally thought - out or instinctive sense of recognition, a sense that a given theological claim about the being and doings of Jesus Christ is more or less valid than another.

There are valid arguments against some claims made as to the age of ice cores.

the nothing from it is valid, to honest people that understand it is a claim, not proof The Book has many «editions» with no one, who believes it, showing any concern of the lack of authenticity when they defend or refer to the BOOK.

And how is that claim more valid than the plethora of other christian faiths (each with their own books, claiming to have been written by the disciples / apostles themselves)?

Rabindranath Tagore (1861 — 1941), the Indian poet and writer, said on one occasion that «to reject any part of humanity's religious experience is to reject truth».6 This is not to say that all religious claims are the same nor equally valid.

For no other religion claims to be the religion and the absolutely unique and only valid revelation of the one living God.

Accordingly, the remainder of this essay will proceed as follows: I will first seek to show that the meta - ethical character of every claim to moral validity includes a principle of social action by which a universal community of rights is constituted, so that no moral theory can be valid if it is inconsistent with these rights.

This formative principle presupposes that moral claims can be accepted or contested because they can be valid or invalid and, thereby, presupposes the possibility of valid substantive prescriptions.

It is just as valid for any of us to say that is baloney and abusive as it is for any Christian to claim that message of soul destruction is based on «love».

Theology in the «objective» sense is chronologically derivative from the activity of theological inquiry because it is the activity that produces objectively valid truth claims and the objective purposes of professional church leadership.

Nor can this consequence be avoided by saying that, substantive prescriptions aside, a valid claim could still be made for the principle of communicative respect itself.

When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?

If it is valid that not respecting another's right to live forfeits any claim one can make for one's own life, it applies even to the killings erupting from anger, jealousy or revenge which make up such a large part of murder statistics but are not normally subject to capital punishment.

Wright represents the pole which claims that historical accuracy about Jesus can be grasped only through the premises of faith and theology; Borg, at the other end, is convinced that historical testimony is valid only insofar as it can be cleansed of distorting confessions of post «Easter faith.

The contemporary NEED to be tolerant and not the traditional usage of the word (accepting that someone else's view be heard) we have a new definition which is framed as being only able to say that their claim is as valid as any other.

The knowledge or truth claims that have been constituted are valid for that moment in time (42) but will eventually be superseded by the generation of a new subjectivity produced by another interaction between the text and the interpreter.

If we only take things that can be empirically measured as being valid evidence (an empirical hermeneutic), then faith claims will, by virtue of being faith claims, remain unsubstantiated.

Whether this claim is valid, or whether the question of theism is more complex than theists and atheists alike conventionally assume, we will presently want to ask.

In the end his claim that no religious scientist can ever provide a valid argument for their position sounds remarkably like a blind act of faith...

If «deeply felt personal experience» is sufficient proof of a claim, then's let's accept that, along with the necessary corollary that all such experiences must be equally valid, such as the gentleman in the asylum who deeply feels he is Napoleon.

Let us reconsider this argument in face of the claim that such postulates as the Keynesian principle of limitation of independent variety constitute adequate grounding for «valid inductive inference».

Commonly one hears little about the demoniacal, notwithstanding that this field, particularly in our time, has a valid claim to be explored, and notwithstanding that the observer, in case he knows how to get a little in rapport with the demon, can, at least occasionally, make use of almost every man for this purpose.

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

In this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible war.

Jesus of Nazareth was now called Jesus Christ (Jesus, the Messiah) because his resurrection was powerful evidence that his messianic claims were valid.

Unlike Mill, for whom this is an empirical claim about human nature, however, Hartshorne views it as an implication of a Whiteheadian metaphysical system which is held to be valid for all possible states of the universe.5 In this system, experiences (or «feelings») are the primitive constituents of all reality.

Next time you hear someone claim to have heard from a god, or to claim the existence of god, ask them for valid proof that a divine being was involved.

Now, if there were ANY valid, verifiable evidence to support the claims about this god, or any of the thousands of other gods...

What the Church needs is a new Pentecost, with priests claiming the grace of their ordination to carry on Christ's mission, and demonstrating to the Catholic faithful and to the world at large that their calling remains valid and essential to the Church.

If different religious practices and beliefs aim at and constitute distinct conditions of human fulfillment, then a very high proportion of what each tradition affirms may be true and valid in very much the terms that the tradition claims.

However, even if a manufacturer makes such a claim there is no way to know whether such claims are actually valid because they generally are not backed by third - party testing or adherence to independent standards of transportation and processing, etc..