The judge in the case ruled that the defendant should pay for the premiums because it was in the interests of justice for plaintiffs to be able to pursue
valid claims without fear of a large adverse costs award.
Not exact matches
If we terminate Mr. Drexler's employment
without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, Mr. Drexler will be entitled to receive (i) a payment of his earned but unpaid annual base salary through the termination date, any accrued vacation pay and any un-reimbursed expenses, and (ii) subject to Mr. Drexler's execution of a
valid general release and waiver of
claims against us, as well as his compliance with the non-competition, non-solicitation and confidential information restrictions described below, (a) a payment equal to his annual base salary and target cash incentive award, one - half of such payment to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date and the remaining one - half of such payment to be paid in six equal monthly installments commencing on the first business day of the seventh calendar month following the termination date, (b) a payment equal to the product of (x) the last annual cash incentive award Mr. Drexler received prior to the termination date and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days of service completed by Mr. Drexler in the year of termination and the denominator of which is 365, such amount to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date, and (c) the immediate vesting of such portion of unvested restricted shares and stock options as provided and pursuant to the terms of the relevant grant agreements under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.
Without this evidencial support, any
claim regarding knowledge of that gods» intentions, actions or desires is not
valid and must be dismissed as fiction.
Without an objective source, both are equally
valid claims.
Tresmond
claims while investigating the «mistake» he discovered that State police had examined his client's medical records
without a
valid search warrant.
Like muscle, brain tissue can change with «exercise», he
claims, so a
valid new question is whether the changes would reverse
without practice.
If you do not embrace this, you will simpl6 be one of the thousands upon thousands of health sites unable or unwilling to do more than peddle hype... your
claims may be
valid but
without evidence of thier validity and openess to questions, give replies with respect... then a website of hype it will be reasonably viewed as.
It's a clever strategy, really: endorsing bogus
claims as
valid science
without having to defend them as such.
If a
valid Best Price Guarantee
claim is submitted
without an existing reservation, the individual making the
valid claim will be contacted by Hotel Name 1 and must make a reservation in the manner communicated by Hotel Name 1 within 24 hours from receipt of the communication or local check - in time at Hotel Name 1 Hotel.
If a
valid Best Rate Guarantee
claim is submitted
without an existing reservation, the individual making the
valid claim will be contacted by Starwood and must make a reservation in the manner communicated by Starwood by the earlier of 24 hours from receipt of the communication or local check - in time at the relevant Starwood Hotel.
Were it true it would be
valid and he stated that the Earth's mantle was a far greater repository of carbon than the crust, at least 7 fold greater, yet
without any evidence to support that
claim.
I realize it's kind of late for making suggestions, but here goes anyway: Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner
claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.It looks like you have addressed T&G's main arguments (eg, about the 2nd law), but I wonder if it might be appropriate to put in a brief description of what it means to «falsify» something in the scientific sense — ie, essentially what T&G must show (and failed to show) to make their case that there is no greenhouse effect: namely, 1) experimental evidence that shows the opposite of what an atmospheric greenhouse effect would necessarily produce and / or 2) evidence that the greenhouse effect would actually violate some physical law (eg, 2nd law of thermo) The pot on the stove example is obviously an attempt to show that you get a colder temp with the water than
without, but I think it's worthwhile explicitly stating that «because T&G failed to demonstrate that the pot on the stove example is a
valid analogy for the earth, they failed to falsify the atmospheric greenhouse effect» And you could also add a sentence stating that «because T&G failed to show that the greenhouse effect would require a violation of the 2nd law [because their arguments were incorrect], they also failed to falsify»
I suggest people stop making assertive statements that simply
claim that I am wrong,
without a single word of
valid physics to support their contention.
It isn't a reasoned, professional and scientifically
valid explanation to
claim that the database has been compromised,
without actually showing it is.
• Denial of a legitimate Rhode Island personal injury
claim without providing a
valid reason or any rationale or justification • Failure to perform a thorough, fair and complete investigation into a personal injury, car accident, premises liability or property damage
claim • Delay payment for compensation of a
valid claim for years or perhaps many years.
If you are seeking to have a marital agreement put together, you do not want to, in the event of a divorce, have to argue the prenuptial is
valid if the other party
claims they were forced to sign it
without the opportunity to seek the advice of legal counsel.
Instead of there being a drive to cut costs at the expense of access to justice, the government would be better to focus on streamlining the systems in place to generate efficiencies,
without hindering people's ability to bring
valid claims.
If a person driving a vehicle
without any
valid license will lapse your entire policy and a policyholder can not
claim compensation for damage caused by wrong side driving.
Claims arising when the vehicle is driven by a person
without valid driving license are excluded under scope the plan.
A
claim without such formal documentation won't be considered
valid.
Hence, the insurer shall not be liable to accept or process
claims for accidental damage that is caused by drivers
without a
valid license at the time of the accident.
Also companies do nt reject
claims without any
valid reasons.
If a defect arises and a
valid claim is received within the Warranty Period, at its option, Antennas Direct ® Inc. will exchange the part with a new or refurbished part that is equivalent to the original part
without charge to the purchasers when returned with proof of date of purchase.
Other Legally Required Disclosures CareerBuilder Employment Screening preserves the right to disclose
without your prior permission any Personal Information about you or your use of this Site if CareerBuilder Employment Screening has a good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) protect and defend the rights, property or safety of CareerBuilder Employment Screening, employees, other users of this Site, or the public; (b) enforce the terms and conditions that apply to use of this Site; (c) as required by a legally
valid request from a competent governmental authority; or (d) respond to
claims that any content violates the rights of third - parties.
Our
claim is not that the Persian version is
without any deficits but we believe that some subscales such as Component 2 (Checking), Component 3 (Obsessions) and Component 4 (Hoarding) are relatively
valid and reliable subscales of our Persian version of VOCI.
A
claim can not be awarded
without evidence that a person is the legal widow, widower or surviving civil partner or would have been but for the fact that they were divorced or the civil partnership was dissolved and the divorce or dissolution is recognised as
valid in the State.