Not exact matches
Criticism,
valid or otherwise, marked you
as a skeptic.
It is based,
as Kenney's informed hectoring reminds us, on perfectly
valid criticism of the Havana regime.
Second, the article is about how their xtian beliefs on s @x, specifically, influenced the situation so
criticism of xtianity
as a whole is perfectly
valid.
This
criticism might lead one to suppose that such a method is
valid only in terms of the original quest, which largely rejected the kerygma
as a falsification of Jesus, and consequently set Out to distinguish him sharply from that theological perversion.
A great many
criticisms of the Christian Faith,
as has already been suggested, are not
valid criticisms at all.
Third, Christians were experiencing wave upon wave of
valid criticism for their historical roles in promoting such evils
as anti-Judaism, colonialism, racism, patriarchalism, anthropocentrism, homophobia, and sexual repression.
In an interesting chapter on the Marxian theme of religion
as the «opiate of the people», Jose Miguez Bonino welcomes the
criticism «
as a
valid warning against the self - deception and confusion which so easily creep into a political programme of any sort when it is clothed in religious language».
Dave has very
valid biblical / scriptual
criticism and Dave directly quoted you
as we'll, and you seem to just want to arrogantly blow him off.
In the ensuing discussion, there was
criticism of my rejection of «the majority opinion of «experts»»
as a good or
valid method to base my position.
This line of
criticism is a
valid identification of the worldliness latent in the «historicism» and «psychologism» of the original quest, and must therefore be recognized
as a
valid theological objection to it.
Despite facing some recent (and
valid)
criticism, the spiritual memoir remains beloved among many people of faith,
as it has been since St. Augustine first invented the genre.
While Alexis Sanchez has received
criticism this season too for his moaning attitude at times, Ozil can be particularly frustrating
as if he isn't being creative and decisive in the final third, then there is a
valid argument that he becomes a liability for the team
as a whole.
For example, I think Stuart's
criticism is a more
valid one of a system where the party has to hold a primary ballot, and where anybody at all can put in
as a candidate, and anybody can choose to vote in it.
In the decade since the RFS was instituted, any
criticism of it prior to the Iowa caucuses was seen
as politically risky — even though
valid and intellectually honest critiques can be lodged from both the right and the left.
While there is certainly some
valid criticism of PUA's,
as I write about in a later article, I personally don't believe in the use of any kind of verbal trickery (lies, insults) to build attraction with the opposite sex.
The
criticisms of its glib race attitudes are
valid, but there is a great deal to recommend, such
as its foul - mouthed comedy and seasoned performers (Woody Harrelson, Sam Rockwell and Peter Dinklage).
Obviously struggling to maintain diplomacy in a catty mood, Stupin bemoans the buzz - cut and cheap - looking camera that Pacey and Dawson, respectively, sport in the opener; less
valid are his
criticisms of the Dawson / Gretchen pairing — and, by extension, Alexander herself, characterized here
as disingenuous —
as well
as Pacey's «nebulous» reasons for splitting up with Joey (they're actually quite sound, regardless of the fact that you'd have to have mad cow disease to consider dumping Katie Holmes).
And whatever PR folderol you've read about The Princess and the Frog representing the company's «first black princess,» be aware that Bold Leaps Forward are hardly the priority here, the common but wholly -
valid criticism being that the characters spend more screentime
as frogs than
as people.
Based on all the data on the depths of the nation's education crisis — including the fact that three out of every 10 fourth - graders are functionally illiterate
as well
as how traditional policies and practices keep laggard teachers in classrooms — you would think
valid criticism, internal and external, would be welcomed.
An essay can contain various elements such
as literary
criticism,
valid arguments, political manifestos, daily observations, remembrances and even reflective thoughts.
The
criticism is a
valid one because,
as you can see from the chart below, resource companies make up more than half the index and financials make up another one - third of the index.
Or maybe not everyone was gushing with praise about Uncharted, and
criticisms of the game are just
as valid as any other opinion even if they don't align with your own?
It's a
valid criticism but,
as far
as Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate is concerned, I can only have so much sympathy with holders of this view.
I pose the question not
as a sarcastic retort but rather a sincere inquiry in response to some very
valid criticisms that have risen in regards towards games journalism.
Even the removal of a bust slider for female characters isn't worth getting mad about, although it certainly is a much more
valid criticism,
as it does restrict basic character creation.
I pose the question not
as a sarcastic retort but rather a sincere inquiry in response to some very
valid criticisms...
(some of the
criticisms might be individuall corrrect, concieveably, but were self - contradictory... they couldn't all be
valid gripes
as they fought each other.)
I'd much rather, when all was said and done, be remembered
as one of the ones with the
valid criticisms, but to err is human, and to find a response that leads to a temporary cessation of stupidity is
as good for the very bright
as for the very dim, if it has a more general application.
(If reviewer
criticisms are judged to be
valid, journals will insist on changes
as a condition of publication.)
How to discuss this publicly is tricky
as hell, but to take the «case closed» position that Holdren did opens you to
valid criticism.
The upshot is that even if we allowed his
criticisms as being entirely
valid, and removed from the study all papers to which it applies, it would only reduce the consensus to 96.8 %.
If there is to be a
valid criticism of the «97 %»
as shown in the Cook paper, then the
criticism [today] would be that the 97 % is based on somewhat dated information [i.e. being on papers averaging about 10 years old by now].
A more
valid criticism is that I'm actually taking out too much data,
as the eruptions are only partially responsible for cooling in that period — for instance there was a La Niña episode in 1984
While the work of Michael Mann and colleagues presents what appears to be compelling evidence of global temperature change, the
criticisms of McIntyre and McKitrick,
as well
as those of other authors mentioned are indeed
valid.
Note that this an automated program, so unless you have a
valid criticism on the algorithm, you can't simply attribute this adjustment
as a reseracher's bias.
It seems a pity that the debate,
as such, is winding down in the face of quite
valid criticisms by non-aligned scientists and politicians.
However,
as I had told Doug originally, I think his
criticism of the OxCal and Calib calibration methods is actually
valid: I just think that imperfect understanding rather than misconduct on the part of Bronk Ramsey (and of other radiocarbon calibration experts) is involved.
Various changes have been made
as a result of
valid criticisms but the essential components remain intact.
I accept your last point
as valid criticism.
It is likely that the
criticism I posted in reply is
valid in response to yours
as well: that the departure from the secular cyclical pattern appears in the land record but not the sea surface temperatures.
As it is, it was a
valid but ultimately not very significant
criticism, in the larger sense of assessing millenial paleoclimatology.
Valid criticism is often classified
as «blind prejudice», especially when devastating.
I think the core of your argument
as I see it (the need for scientists to be less defensive, less circling of the wagons, more introspection, more communication and collaboration with «outsiders», taking
criticism seriously, etc) is important and
valid.
Whether that be because they are adverse to change or they have
valid criticisms about this is rather unimportant now
as SegWit has been activated with overwhelming support from the community.
While you might have a
valid need for reassurance
as you start job hunting outside of the military, Hamilton adds that it's important to be open to constructive
criticism.
The
criticism of Gardner's model of PAS
as not being sufficiently grounded in scientifically established psychological principles and constructs is a
valid criticism.