Sentences with phrase «valid evidence about»

Not exact matches

Now, if there were ANY valid, verifiable evidence to support the claims about this god, or any of the thousands of other gods...

Regardless of the type of legal proceeding or which side uses scientific evidence, the forensic scientist must be able to write a report and testify under oath about: what facts or items of evidence were analyzed or tested; what tests or analyses were used; how valid or reliable those tests or analyses have been found to be by other courts; why and how the forensic scientist was qualified to conduct those tests or analyses; and, what the results of the tests or analyses were and how those results are relevant to the issues in dispute.

Since I was told about my recurrence I started searching for any valid scientific evidence that I could find that might improve the outcome of my situation and came up with the ketogenic diet (dairy free) life style.

The evaluation found teachers were anxious about providing sources of evidence and in focus group interviews they said they opted for face - to - face activities because they could get a certificate of attendance and they knew this was a valid source of evidence.

It is important to note, however, that even if the conclusions from these studies are right, they provide evidence about whether value - added measures are valid on the average across large numbers of teachers.

The weight of evidence about the impact of teacher quality on measurable student outcomes shows that teacher quality is dwarfed by out - of - school factors, and the evidence on value - added methods of determining teacher quality is not valid.

«While there has been some improvement in what is known about supplemental K - 12 online learning, there continues to be a lack of reliable and valid evidence to guide the practice of full - time K - 12 online learning.

Vermont's state board also resolved that until Vermont has more experience with evidence from the SBACs, «the results of the SBAC assessment will not support reliable and valid inferences about student performance, and thus should not be used as the basis for any consequential purpose.»

As the report notes, despite widespread calls for connecting evidence of new teachers» effectiveness back to their preparation programs, «there has been no coordinated effort to provide these programs with valid, reliable, timely, and comparable data about the [educators] they prepare» (p. 2).

But I suppose your anecdotal evidence is about as valid as my own.

no more season's my opinion is no this game will continue to evolve evidence is the survey it over 9000 people took for the future of Killer instinct is in the hands of the community they hear us same situation with the limited edition Shadow Jago figure about the two colors but there are people out there that don't even have internet or don't have no access to the internet so this is good in terms of Making the fan base grow I am always positive meaning there might be a season 4 who knows predictions might be a sequel in the words but who knows I just hope I made some valid points if anybody wants to discuss it with me feel free to do so

How about: A layman can form a valid opinion on a technical climate matter, if they can support it with sound logic and evidence, irrespective of the scientific consensus.

I realize it's kind of late for making suggestions, but here goes anyway: Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.It looks like you have addressed T&G's main arguments (eg, about the 2nd law), but I wonder if it might be appropriate to put in a brief description of what it means to «falsify» something in the scientific sense — ie, essentially what T&G must show (and failed to show) to make their case that there is no greenhouse effect: namely, 1) experimental evidence that shows the opposite of what an atmospheric greenhouse effect would necessarily produce and / or 2) evidence that the greenhouse effect would actually violate some physical law (eg, 2nd law of thermo) The pot on the stove example is obviously an attempt to show that you get a colder temp with the water than without, but I think it's worthwhile explicitly stating that «because T&G failed to demonstrate that the pot on the stove example is a valid analogy for the earth, they failed to falsify the atmospheric greenhouse effect» And you could also add a sentence stating that «because T&G failed to show that the greenhouse effect would require a violation of the 2nd law [because their arguments were incorrect], they also failed to falsify»

I am happy to answer questions about the content of the paper, and, if you think you can make a valid rebuttal, just send such to the CEO of PSI and a response will be forthcoming if you make valid points supported by evidence.

I have written about the biases in many places both on this site and elsewhere and I'm continuously pondering are the biases really so bad or am I throwing aside perfectly valid evidence.

It is about study and evaluation of evidence, or lack thereof, and if it is evidence the skeptic seeks to find valid testing that theory was derived from.

2) «Heck, there's not even any valid evidence that there's been a slowdown»: As I think about this, I think that there are some subtleties in definition.

The measurements taken in the 1800's were acceptable but not as reliable and valid as the wiki article potrays, as evidenced by the still significantly off measurements and predictions made in the 1950's, although these facts do not undo past measurements completely, I take issue with the brief and under stated remarks about the 1800's and shying away from calibration issues.

The more general point though, is that the the balance of evidence shows that the Amazon is sensitive to drought, and the IPCC's statements about it remain valid.

The Divisional Court held that the agreement signed by the insured was not valid because there was no evidence about any discussion between the repair facility and insured about the likely length of the storage or about the insured's understanding of the likely duration of the storage.

Perhaps more important, some individual judges are starting to lay out rules for lawyers about what will be considered valid forensic evidence and what forensic witnesses will be able to claim about their findings.

(«Evidence indicating that early, extensive, and continuous nonmaternal care is associated with less harmonious parent - child relations and elevated levels of aggression and noncompliance suggests that concerns raised about early and extensive child care 15 years ago remain valid and that alternative explanations of Belsky's originally controversial conclusion do not account for seemingly adverse effects of routine nonmaternal care that continue to be reported in the literature... No longer is it tenable for developmental scholars and child - care advocates to deride the notion that early and extensive nonmaternal care of the kind available in most communities poses risks for young children and perhaps the larger society as well.

Fact: «Evidence indicating that early, extensive, and continuous nonmaternal care is associated with less harmonious parent - child relations and elevated levels of aggression and noncompliance suggests that concerns raised about early and extensive child care 15 years ago remain valid and that alternative explanations of Belsky's originally controversial conclusion do not account for seemingly adverse effects of routine nonmaternal care that continue to be reported in the literature... No longer is it tenable for developmental scholars and child - care advocates to deride the notion that early and extensive nonmaternal care of the kind available in most communities poses risks for young children and perhaps the larger society as well.

The court found that the Buyers assented to the Agreement and its terms because first, one of the Buyers signed the agreement; second, they went to visit the Hazelton farm after agreeing to pay a specified commission rate to the Brokerage if they purchased the farm; and finally, the evidence showed that the Brokerage believed the contract to be valid, since they continued to call the Buyers about possible interest in the farm for months following the Buyers» visit.