Sentences with phrase «valid interpretation of»

characterise the psychometric properties of the translated and culturally - adapted versions of the outcome measures, including factor structure and item function) to augment and inform the valid interpretation of the prevalence and risk factor estimates.
But today, I come over to find some serious love for Mr. Smith, who's spending him some tax dollars in order to steer the science of climate more towards what he, as a freakin» politician, thinks is the more valid interpretation of the evidence.
The installation brings these works together as an opportunity to read them with an eye towards retaining spiritual possibilities as a valid interpretation of contemporary artwork.
But Labaree has a particularly subtle and I believe valid interpretation of history.
If this isn't your intention, then I'd encourage you to find ways of communicating that there is more than one valid interpretation of any one blog post.
Michael offers a VALID interpretation of Scripture here (and there is a much more detailed look at these scriptures at http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-gay-christian).
Today, valid interpretation of Genesis 1 - 4 allows an old Earth and recent Adam, a pre-Semitic leader with God - imbued moral capacity.
I'm just suggesting that you consider there are many valid interpretations of the bible, and that God can love and speak to people of different faiths as well as fundamentalist Christians.

Not exact matches

Others, perhaps those with a stricter, academic understanding of feminism, will be disappointed not actually to discover a valid segment of feminism that has been lost among the shuffling conversation Mobley primarily set out to interpret Montgomery's great theme» «The emancipation of women through the gospel of Jesus Christ»» but because he tangled his interpretation with the controversial vocabulary of feminism, he will not please everyone.
There might be many interpretations, but not all are equally valid, and in the conflict of interpretations the text itself can mediate.
You seem to think that your interpretation of the bible is somehow more valid than other interpretation.
In interpreting his biblical texts Bultmann made use of these ideas with a vigor which promises that his basic principles of interpretation may survive, still seem valid, when the misty vocabulary of Heidegger's early philosophy no longer seems compelling.
The question of can it prevent some singular instance of violence is also a valid interpretation — but not the only one.
Indeed, for her, as for an increasing number of scholars, the text is open to various valid interpretations.
In one sense this criticism is indeed valid, for in this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himself.
For you to suggest that there may be some other «valid» interpretation if one takes into consideration the «historical / cultural context of scripture», is to invoke a straw man logical fallacy.
In a religious view such as that outlined in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of interpretation.
We have already pointed out that biblical interpreters in the first century used very different methods from ours and some of the interpretations which men of those days found very convincing may no longer seem valid to us.
A localized flood of some sort is a valid interpretation.
So, this means that there is ONE valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text in such a way as to make people ponder various interpretations (which would be a certain kind of genre, but not most texts).
In valid interpretation we feel our way into each symbol in order to sense the surplus of meaning that beckons us beyond ourselves to discover something new.
In this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible war.
To the valid theme of the Christological ethic worked out by van Buren add the emphasis on Protestant worldliness both as an interpretation of the Reformation and as an attack on certain forms of modern sensibility.
I have advocated that whatever is valid concerning disclosures can be subsumed under the first rubric, since disclosures involve the interpretation of experience rather than the acquisition of self - authenticating knowledge.
Your own interpretation of the Bible is only as valid as the pastor who interprets it for you from the pulpit.
Being a subjective statistic it is hard to get many valid conclusions from the data provided as the definition of a clear cut chance is up for interpretation.
(c) And also for * submissions based on the assertion that Mr. Woyome had no contract with the Government of Ghana * and therefore had no valid claims against the Government be determined by the High Court, and not by this Court (the Supreme Court), since they do not involve, according to the relevant case law, the interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and do not therefore fall within the ambit of the Court's original jurisdiction under Article 130 (1) of the 1992 Constitution.
It repeats the argument that NIH's interpretation of Dickey - Wicker is valid because Congress and three presidential administrations have supported it.
To establish criterion - related evidence of validity, VAM estimates should be highly correlated with other criterion, all of which should yield valid interpretations and uses.
Accordingly, if VAM estimates are highly correlated to biasing factors, then it becomes impossible to make valid interpretations about the causes of student achievement gains or losses as intended.
He suggested that the more accurate conversation would focus on whether the interpretation and use of the test results is valid.
If Commisioner Wentzell's interpretation of the law is indeed valid, then theoretically charter operators can get away with anything.
In addition, no regulating body was able to provide a clear and enforceable definition of a valid vendor, which means that enforcement is, at best, contextual and subject to interpretation.
The point of art is not to give the viewer something so generic that any interpretation is valid, but to actually communicate something.
If every part of the painting can be optically fetched to the surface and there is no figuration to favour a particular spatial interpretation, then there will surely be several equally valid spatial possibilities.
Contrasting these two this way makes it sound as if scientific collection of facts from «global - scale monitoring» can somehow never lead to «doom scenarios» and that, if they do, the monitoring or its interpretation must be suspect; not really a valid assumption afaics.
In that case they could both be fair reflections of the science — within certain limits there doesn't have to be just one single valid interpretation.
What the Berliner's summary says is that: IF we have a temporal chaotic system and IF this system is ergodic THEN a stochastical interpretation is possible Unfortunately neither of the ifs is valid for weather / climate.
But regardless of how scientists act, they should all advance their arguments through evidence and valid scientific interpretations.
From a scientific point of view the exact execution and framing could be criticized on certain aspects (e.g. ECS is linearly extrapolated instead of logarithmically; the interpretation that recent record warmth are not peaks but rather a «correction to the trend line» depends strongly on the exact way the endpoints of the observed temperature are smoothed; the effect of non-CO2 greenhouse gases is excluded from the analysis and discussion), but the underlying point, that more warming is in store than we're currently seeing, is both valid and very important.
At this moment we have all the hounds of hell rushing on Fred Pierce's neck for a normal journalistic habit of depending on a source for an interpretation of an actors attitude — and such a pathetically minor thing — and then we have Gavin Schmidts email confirming that interpretation is valid — and for you logic, «deepclimate» naifs out there, that an interpretation is «valid» doesn't mean it's necessarillary the right interpretation!
Since they are clearly «images of the future» Lord Monckton's interpretations of them are as useful and valid as anyone else's.
It is valid, although I would argue the context and scope of «catastrophic semiconductor failure» is much clearer and less open to interpretation that «catastrophic anthropogenic global warming / climate change».
Even if the statistical relationship is valid, EJN's physical interpretation is faulty: a westward and southward shift of the Bermuda High causes an increased meridional sea level pressure gradient and stronger tradewinds over the main development region, not a relaxation of the tradewinds.
It seems most of the erroneous data the reviewer refers to initially are simply valid disagreements on interpretation of data, and not making stuff up.
As a matter of constitutional U.S. law, your conviction remains valid and you must serve the sentence, if your conviction was final and all appeals had been exhausted when the new court decision was announced unless it was a «new rule» of law rather than a mere interpretation of existing law, but if your conviction was not yet final because post-conviction motions or appeals were still pending, the new rule of law could be utilized to challenge your conviction.
Courts on judicial review do view expertise as a valid doctrinal reason for deference, and are willing to put aside their own interpretation of a statute in favour of a decision - maker's.
But Graham says that since fiction lets you know exactly what's going on in the mind of a character — which you can't in real life — and persuades you to take a character's painstakingly edited interpretation of an event as the only valid interpretation, it can be troublesome to take a novel - reading mentality into reality.
The Privy Council in Edwards accepted the Lambe proposition as being generally valid, but added that the BNA Act should not be construed strictly, as penal or tax statutes are, and should instead be given a liberal interpretation since it was «passed to ensure the peace, order and good government of a British Colony.»
By concentrating on the legal interpretation of the GC, the Court could avoid a consideration of the claims brought by Front Polisario, which included potentially valid accusations relating to the violation of fundamental principles of EUlaw and international law.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z