characterise the psychometric properties of the translated and culturally - adapted versions of the outcome measures, including factor structure and item function) to augment and inform
the valid interpretation of the prevalence and risk factor estimates.
But today, I come over to find some serious love for Mr. Smith, who's spending him some tax dollars in order to steer the science of climate more towards what he, as a freakin» politician, thinks is the more
valid interpretation of the evidence.
The installation brings these works together as an opportunity to read them with an eye towards retaining spiritual possibilities as
a valid interpretation of contemporary artwork.
But Labaree has a particularly subtle and I believe
valid interpretation of history.
If this isn't your intention, then I'd encourage you to find ways of communicating that there is more than one
valid interpretation of any one blog post.
Michael offers
a VALID interpretation of Scripture here (and there is a much more detailed look at these scriptures at http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-gay-christian).
Today,
valid interpretation of Genesis 1 - 4 allows an old Earth and recent Adam, a pre-Semitic leader with God - imbued moral capacity.
I'm just suggesting that you consider there are many
valid interpretations of the bible, and that God can love and speak to people of different faiths as well as fundamentalist Christians.
Not exact matches
Others, perhaps those with a stricter, academic understanding
of feminism, will be disappointed not actually to discover a
valid segment
of feminism that has been lost among the shuffling conversation Mobley primarily set out to interpret Montgomery's great theme» «The emancipation
of women through the gospel
of Jesus Christ»» but because he tangled his
interpretation with the controversial vocabulary
of feminism, he will not please everyone.
There might be many
interpretations, but not all are equally
valid, and in the conflict
of interpretations the text itself can mediate.
You seem to think that your
interpretation of the bible is somehow more
valid than other
interpretation.
In interpreting his biblical texts Bultmann made use
of these ideas with a vigor which promises that his basic principles
of interpretation may survive, still seem
valid, when the misty vocabulary
of Heidegger's early philosophy no longer seems compelling.
The question
of can it prevent some singular instance
of violence is also a
valid interpretation — but not the only one.
Indeed, for her, as for an increasing number
of scholars, the text is open to various
valid interpretations.
In one sense this criticism is indeed
valid, for in this
interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences
of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himself.
For you to suggest that there may be some other «
valid»
interpretation if one takes into consideration the «historical / cultural context
of scripture», is to invoke a straw man logical fallacy.
In a religious view such as that outlined in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently
valid insights
of both the earlier and the later modes
of interpretation.
We have already pointed out that biblical interpreters in the first century used very different methods from ours and some
of the
interpretations which men
of those days found very convincing may no longer seem
valid to us.
A localized flood
of some sort is a
valid interpretation.
So, this means that there is ONE
valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text in such a way as to make people ponder various
interpretations (which would be a certain kind
of genre, but not most texts).
In
valid interpretation we feel our way into each symbol in order to sense the surplus
of meaning that beckons us beyond ourselves to discover something new.
In this paper, I want to challenge this
interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the
interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a
valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible war.
To the
valid theme
of the Christological ethic worked out by van Buren add the emphasis on Protestant worldliness both as an
interpretation of the Reformation and as an attack on certain forms
of modern sensibility.
I have advocated that whatever is
valid concerning disclosures can be subsumed under the first rubric, since disclosures involve the
interpretation of experience rather than the acquisition
of self - authenticating knowledge.
Your own
interpretation of the Bible is only as
valid as the pastor who interprets it for you from the pulpit.
Being a subjective statistic it is hard to get many
valid conclusions from the data provided as the definition
of a clear cut chance is up for
interpretation.
(c) And also for * submissions based on the assertion that Mr. Woyome had no contract with the Government
of Ghana * and therefore had no
valid claims against the Government be determined by the High Court, and not by this Court (the Supreme Court), since they do not involve, according to the relevant case law, the
interpretation and enforcement
of the Constitution and do not therefore fall within the ambit
of the Court's original jurisdiction under Article 130 (1)
of the 1992 Constitution.
It repeats the argument that NIH's
interpretation of Dickey - Wicker is
valid because Congress and three presidential administrations have supported it.
To establish criterion - related evidence
of validity, VAM estimates should be highly correlated with other criterion, all
of which should yield
valid interpretations and uses.
Accordingly, if VAM estimates are highly correlated to biasing factors, then it becomes impossible to make
valid interpretations about the causes
of student achievement gains or losses as intended.
He suggested that the more accurate conversation would focus on whether the
interpretation and use
of the test results is
valid.
If Commisioner Wentzell's
interpretation of the law is indeed
valid, then theoretically charter operators can get away with anything.
In addition, no regulating body was able to provide a clear and enforceable definition
of a
valid vendor, which means that enforcement is, at best, contextual and subject to
interpretation.
The point
of art is not to give the viewer something so generic that any
interpretation is
valid, but to actually communicate something.
If every part
of the painting can be optically fetched to the surface and there is no figuration to favour a particular spatial
interpretation, then there will surely be several equally
valid spatial possibilities.
Contrasting these two this way makes it sound as if scientific collection
of facts from «global - scale monitoring» can somehow never lead to «doom scenarios» and that, if they do, the monitoring or its
interpretation must be suspect; not really a
valid assumption afaics.
In that case they could both be fair reflections
of the science — within certain limits there doesn't have to be just one single
valid interpretation.
What the Berliner's summary says is that: IF we have a temporal chaotic system and IF this system is ergodic THEN a stochastical
interpretation is possible Unfortunately neither
of the ifs is
valid for weather / climate.
But regardless
of how scientists act, they should all advance their arguments through evidence and
valid scientific
interpretations.
From a scientific point
of view the exact execution and framing could be criticized on certain aspects (e.g. ECS is linearly extrapolated instead
of logarithmically; the
interpretation that recent record warmth are not peaks but rather a «correction to the trend line» depends strongly on the exact way the endpoints
of the observed temperature are smoothed; the effect
of non-CO2 greenhouse gases is excluded from the analysis and discussion), but the underlying point, that more warming is in store than we're currently seeing, is both
valid and very important.
At this moment we have all the hounds
of hell rushing on Fred Pierce's neck for a normal journalistic habit
of depending on a source for an
interpretation of an actors attitude — and such a pathetically minor thing — and then we have Gavin Schmidts email confirming that
interpretation is
valid — and for you logic, «deepclimate» naifs out there, that an
interpretation is «
valid» doesn't mean it's necessarillary the right
interpretation!
Since they are clearly «images
of the future» Lord Monckton's
interpretations of them are as useful and
valid as anyone else's.
It is
valid, although I would argue the context and scope
of «catastrophic semiconductor failure» is much clearer and less open to
interpretation that «catastrophic anthropogenic global warming / climate change».
Even if the statistical relationship is
valid, EJN's physical
interpretation is faulty: a westward and southward shift
of the Bermuda High causes an increased meridional sea level pressure gradient and stronger tradewinds over the main development region, not a relaxation
of the tradewinds.
It seems most
of the erroneous data the reviewer refers to initially are simply
valid disagreements on
interpretation of data, and not making stuff up.
As a matter
of constitutional U.S. law, your conviction remains
valid and you must serve the sentence, if your conviction was final and all appeals had been exhausted when the new court decision was announced unless it was a «new rule»
of law rather than a mere
interpretation of existing law, but if your conviction was not yet final because post-conviction motions or appeals were still pending, the new rule
of law could be utilized to challenge your conviction.
Courts on judicial review do view expertise as a
valid doctrinal reason for deference, and are willing to put aside their own
interpretation of a statute in favour
of a decision - maker's.
But Graham says that since fiction lets you know exactly what's going on in the mind
of a character — which you can't in real life — and persuades you to take a character's painstakingly edited
interpretation of an event as the only
valid interpretation, it can be troublesome to take a novel - reading mentality into reality.
The Privy Council in Edwards accepted the Lambe proposition as being generally
valid, but added that the BNA Act should not be construed strictly, as penal or tax statutes are, and should instead be given a liberal
interpretation since it was «passed to ensure the peace, order and good government
of a British Colony.»
By concentrating on the legal
interpretation of the GC, the Court could avoid a consideration
of the claims brought by Front Polisario, which included potentially
valid accusations relating to the violation
of fundamental principles
of EUlaw and international law.