Sentences with phrase «valid marriage does»

Not exact matches

Of course an annulment does not dissolve a valid marriage but is a declaration that such a marriage never existed (while acknowledging the legitimacy of the children born of the union).

CatholicMom sez: o even if «man» passes a law saying «they» can get married as two men or two women, this does not make the marriage valid.

So even if «man» passes a law saying «they» can get married as two men or two women, this does not make the marriage valid.

He went so far as to suggest, but did not develop the idea, that homosexuals who had been ordained were not validly ordained, homosexuality being an «impediment» to ordination in the same way that there may be impediments to a valid sacramental marriage.

If the sincere exchange of vows doesn't make their marriage valid, what does?

But even aside from your personal opinion, and whether or not it is shaped by the push for equality, the State does have an interest in stable marriages and therefor a valid reason to regulate them.

But people divorce for all sorts of reasons that don't necessarily fit these groups» assessment of «unnecessary divorce,» marriages ending because of some vague unhappiness or a lack of commitment, and that fall outside of the few reasons they consider valid — physical abuse, drug or booze addiction, incarceration and abandonment.

The Five - Year Engagement doesn't go anywhere near that... in fact, it appears to wholly endorse the idea that a marriage isn't valid until the «proper» sort of big party can be arranged to mark it.

Div., June 12, 2006, the court is reported to have held that the requirements of a valid contract had not been met since the amount of the payment was inequitable and the defendant had signed the agreement under duress, fearing that, if he did not do so, the marriage would not take place and that he would be deported.

A «void marriage» was never valid from the outset because the parties didn't have the capacity (legal ability) to enter into a marriage.

The general rule is that the ability to have a valid divorce has nothing to do with where the marriage was entered into, or the citizenship of the parties.

There is an escape clause in the act, however, giving a royal over the age of 25 the right to contract a valid marriage with whomever, provided notice is given to the Privy Council of the intention to marry despite refused consent and provided that both Houses of Parliament do not «expressly declare their disapprobation of such intended marriage.»

If the H - 1B visa employee who was not hired or was fired for failing a drug test did not find new comparable work within six months, the visa would expire, and that individual would be deportable if (1) the Department of Homeland Security chose to begin deportation proceedings, and (2) the employee could not obtain another visa (e.g. a spouse visa following a marriage to a U.S. citizen) that would allow that individual to obtain a valid visa on some other grounds, and (3) the H - 1B employee had no valid reason to claim asylum in the United States due to a threat of persecution if deported.

«(c) that either the party to the marriage did not validly consent to it, whether in consequence of duress, mistake, unsoundness of mind or otherwise; (d) that at the time of the marriage either party, though capable of giving a valid consent, was suffering (whether continuously or intermittently) from mental disorder within the meaning of [the Mental Health Act 1983] of such a kind or to such an extent as to be unfitted for marriage.»

If you would be allowed social security benefits under your spouse's name, these benefits wouldn't be valid in a state that doesn't recognize same sex marriages.

-- The prenup is not in writing: For a prenuptial agreement to be valid, it must be a written document, witnessed by outside parties — At least one party provided false information: The inclusion of untruthful information or even incomplete information will render a prenuptial agreement invalid — Pressure, duress or coercion: If one party forces the other to sign a prenuptial agreement, regardless of whom the document most benefits, it will be invalid — The prenup was not read: If one or the other spouse does not read the prenuptial agreement, it is possible the document could be challenged — Improper execution: To be valid, the agreement must be read and signed by both parties before the marriage occurs — Gross unfairness: While a prenuptial agreement gives the couple a great deal of flexibility in how they establish financial rights, the court may decide not to enforce the prenup if it is grossly unfair to one of the parties

«We're the leaders of gay marriage... and the federal government is saying «Oh, yes, sorry, we forgot to mention that for the last nine years we've been marrying people that we didn't think those were valid»,» she told Reuters on Thursday.

The recent decision of Guivian v Goldarre, 2017 BCSC 1786 («Guivian v. Goldarre») is a good example of when a marriage agreement done without legal advice was found to be valid, but was still be subject to court review.

If same - sex marriages are abhorrent to certain cultures, just as we might abhor the marriage of children, nothing that Canada can do will ensure that those cultures will treat the marriages celebrated here as valid.

If you happen to live in a state that doesn't recognize common law marriage, you and your spouse will still be able to obtain a divorce in that state if your common law marriage was entered into and legally valid in a state that recognizes such marriages.