No vendors of mastery examination tests claim their test is
a valid measure of teacher performance.»
Every major academic study has determined that standardized test scores ARE NOT
A VALID MEASURE of teacher performance.
A valid measure of teacher performance is one designed to capture how well teachers contribute to the student outcomes we value most.
Not exact matches
Student - test - based
measures of teacher performance are receiving increasing attention in part because there are, as yet, few complementary or alternative
measures that can provide reliable and
valid information on the effectiveness
of a
teacher's classroom practice.
When we talk about «accurate»
measures of teacher performance, researchers mean
measures that are
valid and reliable.
Unless such tests are shown to be developmentally appropriate, scientifically
valid, and reliable for the purpose
of measuring both student learning and a
teacher's
performance, such tests may not be used to support any employment action against a
teacher and may be used only to provide non-evaluative formative feedback.Standardized tests, even if deemed
valid and reliable, may not be used to support any employment action against a
teacher.
Unless such tests are shown to be developmentally appropriate, scientifically
valid, and reliable for the purpose
of measuring both student learning and a
teacher's
performance, such tests may not be used to support any employment action against a
teacher and may be used only to provide non-evaluative formative feedback.
First, one
measure might be less
valid than another, even when the intended notion
of teacher performance is the same.
To date Pennsylvania's Department
of Education (PDE) apparently has ignored the fact that the Data Recognition Corporation (DRC), the vendor
of its state tests, has avoided making any claims that their tests are
valid for use as
measures of teacher performance (see, for example, here).
Examples
of outcome data that are also appropriate and necessary to assess
teacher effectiveness are students» individual growth and progress as
measured on
valid and reliable standardized instruments,
teacher made tests that aligned with the curriculum, student
performance demonstrations in a variety
of media, and portfolios
of student work.
States and districts should develop frameworks for
teacher performance appraisal that are based on research - supported best practices, consistent in application, fair to
teachers and evaluators, and
valid and reliable
measures of teacher performance.
Examples
of outcome criteria that are also appropriate and necessary are students» individual growth and progress as
measured on
valid and reliable standardized instruments,
teacher - made tests that are aligned with the curriculum, student
performance demonstrations in a variety
of media, and portfolios
of student work.
The
valid use
of student
performance measures for
teacher evaluation.
If you are to give validity to the value - added approach to
measuring a
teacher's
performance, the prerequisite is that the standardized test is a
valid measure of a student's learning and knowledge, and that in itself is controversial.
For instance,
performance on infrequent statewide assessments does not capture all dimensions
of student learning and classroom outcomes.38 Further, the majority
of teachers work in grades or subject areas to which state assessments do not apply, which poses a challenge in defining
valid and reliable
measures of student achievement.
He contends that only random assignment
of teachers and students — wholly impractical in big school systems — can eliminate enough bias and error to obtain a
valid measure of how much
teachers improve student
performance.