Sentences with phrase «valid order of a court»

It is therefore trite that the right to contest election by any citizen can only be abridged by a valid order of a court of record.

Not exact matches

One of the most common reasons a court will toss a non-compete claims is when the employee did not receive consideration; a non-compete agreement is a contract, and contracts require the exchange of consideration in order to be valid.
As the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed, a law aimed at suppressing or reducing an «evil» or addressing a public concern relating to peace, order, security, morality, health, or some other similar purpose is a valid exercise of the federal government's criminal law power.
Law officials believe that with a valid court order, the authorities should never be locked out of a device.
a valid court order of protection issued by a New York State Court and / or a statement that disclosure of claim - related information could endanger the person seeking confidentiacourt order of protection issued by a New York State Court and / or a statement that disclosure of claim - related information could endanger the person seeking confidentiaCourt and / or a statement that disclosure of claim - related information could endanger the person seeking confidentiality.
However, Justice Ademola who was not comfortable with the violation of his order had told the Federal Government counsel to inform his client to learn how to respect and obey a valid court order.
As things stand the various Orders of the High Court Judge remain legally valid and effective and the couple intend to marry, in accordance with those Orders.
Abonta also said, the committee obtained a document which showed that, the Attorney - General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami wrote to the IGP and advised him to honour the subsisting court orders, «in absence of any appeal or valid stay of execution.»
Nnamdi Kanu was granted bail on a lesser charge but was rearrested on two occasions until the government filed higher charges relating to terrorism and treason and found courts which rightly on the basis of the more severe charges refused bail; Dasuki's case is more complicated - today there are valid orders of bail made by several courts in his favour, but he has consistently been re-arrested and a charge of leaving the army improperly over two decades ago is now being added to his alleged crimes -LRB-!)
Some former Corinthian students are suing the Department of Education, alleging that its failure to continue providing full discharges is unlawful and asking the court to order the Department to provide full discharges to Corinthian borrowers with valid borrower defense claims.
Procedure to Make a Request To submit a valid court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim related information by alternative means or at alternative locations to Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection please use the following address:
To submit a valid court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim related information by alternative means or at alternative locations to Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection please use the following address:
In this way, the powerless (society) will stop watching those programmed to wreck everything (lawyers and their clients repeated failures to comply with court orders and few consequences) and undertake to participate in stopping the cycle (provided there was no legally valid reason for it to be wrecked in the first place) of «wreck» vs. «fix - it.»
In the UAE there are just three ways to legally terminate a contract, as provided for in Article 267 of the UAE Civil Code which states that «if a contract is valid and binding, it shall not be permissible for either of the contracting parties to resile from it, or vary or cancel it, save by mutual consent, or an order of the court, or under a provision of the law».
Article 14 seeks to ensure that an order made in one country remains valid notwithstanding that the jurisdiction of that court has been lost, for instance following a lawful move.
At the 2011 retrial, ordered by the Court of Appeal, Vos J, citing 19th and 20th century judgments, concluded that «in the peculiar, some might say extraordinary circumstances of this case», Martin «knew and approved» of the 2004 will, «wanted Anne to benefit under it», «validly directed her to sign it on his behalf» and that it was «valid, even though it was signed by its beneficiary on behalf of the testator».
Playing uncivil, tactical, inappropriate, old - school, trial by ambush games like: threatening to require proof of obviously valid records, holding back important documents until the last second, failing to fulfil undertakings until the eve of trial, delivering new expert's reports during the trial, saying untrue things to counsel opposite (whether knowingly or not), failing to prepare examinations in advance to «wing it» at trial, refusing to agree to the admissibility of relevant documents while requiring changes to be made to irrelevant ones, refusing to share costs of joint expenses, refusing to cooperate on court ordered process matters, are all wrongful.
These are all valid rules which the courts can and will enforce by way of a court order.
Keep in mind that the Order is valid for six months — unless the Supreme Court issues an extension, all of the out - of - state lawyers (again, working for free) will need to wrap up their work by late February / early March 2018.
The court noted that evidence of enhanced safety risks, such as evidence which would point to a substance abuse problem in the workplace is required in order to make such a policy valid.
The Bingham Centre makes the valid point that the fact that cases such as Al Rawi (allegations of rendition and torture by the security services which resulted in a large civil settlement) have meant courts ordering more disclosure from the security services may be more a result of policy changes by the security services than of judicial activism which needs to be reined in.
On the first point — and based on longstanding precedent that considered the provisions of the federal Divorce Act — the law states that once the foreign Chinese court had made a valid divorce order, this removes the authority of the Ontario court to hear and determine corollary matters.
A number of others pointed out that there was no reason to set a different privacy standard for deceased individuals than we had for living individuals and that it has been standard practice to release the information of deceased individuals with a valid consent of the executor, next of kin, or specific court order.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners» Health Information Privacy Model Act states, «A carrier shall not collect, use or disclose protected health information without a valid authorization from the subject of the protected health information, except as permitted by * * * this Act or as permitted or required by law or court order.
On the evidence before the court, Justice Healey ordered that the notice of objection was vacated, and declared that the 2010 will was the valid will of the deceased and that all previous wills were revoked, and dismissed the objector's cross-motion.
To submit a valid court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim - related information by alternative means or at alternative locations to Seven Corners, Inc., please send the following information to Seven Corners, Inc..
Procedure to Make a Request To submit a valid court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim related information by alternative means or at alternative locations to Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection please use the following address:
To submit a valid court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim related information by alternative means or at alternative locations to Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection please use the following address:
To submit a valid court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim - related information by alternative means or at alternative locations to Seven Corners, please use the office address or the email address listed below.
Any information collected by CoverHound may be shared if it is necessary to investigate, prevent or prosecute illegal activities, suspected fraud, violations to the Terms and Conditions, when we believe in good faith that disclosure is necessary to protect our rights, protect your safety or the safety of others, investigate fraud, or respond to a government request or as otherwise required by law or a valid government request (including, but not limited to, search warrants, subpoenas or court orders).
Remember, in order for your certificate of completion to be valid for ticket dismissal make sure you obtain permission from your court before taking any driving safety course.
In the trial decision in Ward - v - Western Australia, the Court ordered that the native title parties have rights to use and enjoy the resources of the area and control others use of these (orders, para's 3 (e) and (f)-RRB-; although the Judge also recognised rights created in valid mining leases (Schedule 3).
Typically, this involves proving that there was a valid court order, that the order required your ex-spouse to do something, that he was aware of the order, that he had the ability to follow the order, and that he purposefully disobeyed the order.
Unless prohibited by law or by a valid court order, we will notify you of any subpoena received from any other party (i.e., for civil litigation) which requires us to disclose your identity, and will wait ten (10) days, or a lesser amount of time as required by the deadline in the subpoena, before providing the information requested by the subpoena.
(3) If, before the commencement of this Part, a court purported to convict a person of an offence against an enforcement law on the basis that an ineffective order was a valid order, nothing in this section is to be taken to validate or confirm that conviction.
If you are not sure about this, then I recommend you go down to your local clerk of court, pull the old child custody file (or files) and look to see if there is a valid child custody order in the court file.
The Convention seeks to prevent international child abduction and provide a legal framework for the return of children who have been abducted in violation of a valid Court Order.
The trial court entered a permanent restraining order prohibiting the government from taking the Challengers» property, but the Supreme Court of Connecticut reversed the trial court and ruled that the takings were vcourt entered a permanent restraining order prohibiting the government from taking the Challengers» property, but the Supreme Court of Connecticut reversed the trial court and ruled that the takings were vCourt of Connecticut reversed the trial court and ruled that the takings were vcourt and ruled that the takings were valid.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z