Not exact matches
Under the guidelines you
mentioned, that post would be subject to being blocked, regardless of how
valid his
points may have been.
@chad, you have some
valid points, until late 20th century Christians were able to pray in schools, have the Ten Commandments displayed and
mention God in the public arena.
Except for being 10
points behind city you already
mentioned, he said nothing wrong, all his
points are
valid and probably repeated again... we won the FA cup last year and this year as well, we need to push for something more valuable... Just promises won't satisfy us
He has a
valid point, you are simply being obtuse making the reference to RB's when he
mentioned strikers.
The only other thing I wanted to
mention was regarding Jody's comment — «5) my parents respected me enough to allow me that decision and at this
point I've not found a
valid reason to pursue such a pointless operation.»
One thing a lot of my male friends have
mentioned is «I don't quite get where this is going...» which is a
valid point....
I've clearly
mentioned when
points are my own gut instinct (and thus may or may not be
valid).
I also want to
mention a
point brought up by h lynn keith (aka antares) in my blog comments: «9,000 is a statistically
valid sample IF AND ONLY IF the members of the sample were randomly selected from the target population.»
The other
points that were
mentioned about having cash for buying opportunities, emergency fund etc are perfectly
valid as well.
I just finished it because someone else
mentioned it above, and it is a good read with many good,
valid points.
that guy did
mention some
valid points.
You have
mentioned a lot of
valid points I totally agree, however I've been wondering if the ideas (or «mechanics») of those games i've
mentioned couldn't be improved in some way to get further down the ideal of «a truely interactive medium», instead of trying to find completely new ways.
They neglect the pre-1980s temperatures, the post-2000 temperatures, and the recent millennium of historical temperatures — they take a few unidentified data
points out of a long series that support their desired
point — fail to
mention those data
points and past trends that refute their
point — and assert that they have presented a
valid overall picture — in short, cherry - picking.
(i) is submitted in support of, and at the time the application is made; (ii) relates to grounds of appeal other than those
mentioned above; (iii) is adduced to prove that a document is genuine or
valid; or (iv) is adduced in connection with the exercise of discretion under the immigration rules to refuse the application on grounds not related to the acquisition of
points under the
points - based system.
This is a
valid point since the patent only
mentions OLED display that could be used in portable electronic devices like media players, mobile phones and tablet computing devices.
«Staff splitting,» as
mentioned earlier, is a much - discussed phenomenon in which professionals treating borderline patients begin arguing and fighting about a patient, the treatment plan, or the behavior of the other professionals with the patient... arguments among staff members and differences in
points of view, traditionally associated with staff splitting, are seen as failures in synthesis and interpersonal process among the staff rather than as a patient's problem... Therapist disagreements over a patient are treated as potentially equally
valid poles of a dialectic.