Sentences with phrase «valid points as»

Then I read the posts of PED, Carolyne, and Brian and thought that they had some valid points as well.

Then you continue exploring valid points as to why it should have online multiplayer.

In turn, perhaps DT makes a valid point as even when not scoring Lacazette contributes to Arsenal's build - up play and he cost significantly less albeit he's two years older, but naturally there will be many who strongly disagree with his suggestion.

I stand corrected, it was as much a valid point as anything.

Bob makes a valid point as to the competitive nature of this segment, and it's vital to remain on the cutting edge in packaging and technology.

One of the most common arguments brought up in regards to the «failure» of the Vita is that Sony have not supported it with enough marketing, and that's as valid a point as any.

Initially this was a valid point as Google's browser - based apps weren't yet fully developed and didn't work that well when your internet connection went down (not too good for use on the move).

Not exact matches

At what point does random chance cease to be an equally valid explanation as the alternative explanations that it is a two - headed coin or that I am lying?

ensense — My point is that it is just as valid to believe life begins at the moment an egg or sperm is formed as it is to believe like the Christers do.

While the professor is portrayed here as being callous and ridiculing, he does have a valid point.

That is exactly my point... your «understanding» of Jesus, and Fred Phelps «understanding» of Jesus are equally valid because it is nothing more than an opinion... except it is framed as objective.

Wright notes that «we need to note carefully that to invoke «the literal meaning of scripture,» hoping thereby to settle a point by echoing the phraseology of the Reformers, could be valid only if we meant, not «literal» as opposed to metaphorical, but «literal» (which might include metaphorical if that, arguable, was the original sense) as opposed to the three other medieval senses...»

Mr. Blair's point is that such arguments should be allowed and encouraged in the public sphere as valid means of making moral arguments.

Unless the discussion in the preceding pages has entirely failed to make its point, it will be plain that what is being proposed in this book is (as I have said) a «de-mythologizing» of the inherited notions of «life after death», with their (to many of us) impossible assertions; and also the «re-mythologizing» — or better, the re-conceiving — of their implicit intention so that we may have a valid way of affirming the value and worth of human existence, its significance and importance for God, and its preservation in God as a reality which has affected the divine life and in God has acquired an enduring quality which nothing can take away.

I would posit that an argument could be made for the existance of Christianity if Paul had not been invovled as equally valid, therfore this being a moot point.

O'Malley is especially single - minded in eschewing the use of terminology such as «liberal» or «conservative», making the valid point that such broad groupings were not easily identifiable at the time and were often marked by a certain fluidity in connection with particular issues.

This article has some valid points but is as red in color politically as the website itself.

Umberto Eco's maxim, «Stat rosa pristina nomine, nomina nuda tenemos», which stands as the closure of his novel, The Name of the Rose, (28) is as valid a starting point as any other.

Any valid effort at making Christianity relevant to the modern world must take as its starting point the tackling of the problem of reconciling immanence and transcendence.

That is why Christians are called to minister to those around them, because we know that at one time we to we're lost As to the middle part, it is a valid point, however the reason Christians are «supposed» to be saved is because they realize their sin and how much God loves them.

As Manfred Mezger has pointed out, an opera may be right and valid without an audience, but a service of the Word is a call, and a call is meaningless without a hearer.

My point is valid but you just don't want to see yourself that way so you make excuses as to why your un-provable belief is better than someone else's, and the excuse you are using is «Well everybody else believes this way so it must be true.»

The assertion of God's omnipotence is thus no universally valid proposition, to be applied at will, which may be presupposed as a starting - point for a world view.

While valid, both points could have been made just as effectively in a subtler manner.

Insulting folks as a means to an end seldom reaches anyone, and even IF your points are valid, introducing them with arrogance and disdain, only causes those you wish to reach to shut down or to search for ways to disprove what you are saying.

To overcome anthropocentrism is precisely to recognize that other creatures also have their points of view, which are just as valid as ours, that their suffering is just as real as ours.

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

, but over time I've come to discover that he has some very valid points and actually is not as rebellious and stubborn as I thought.

As for this priest, he may have a valid point.

In this crisis of decision, the continuity with the past is accordingly abrogated and the present can not be understood from the point of view of development — though in other connections, when man is thought of as an observer, continuity may have a valid meaning.

Any genuine struggle for justice could only begin at the point where such limits are called into question and where the rights of one are seen also as being valid for the other.

The point should be valid for those people of faith who believe in a personal God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent, as Christians, Muslims and Jews do believe.»

You said, «You may take it as an insult, but I would suggest that what you are pointing out is actually a weak analogy fallacy, i.e. the comparison between the evidence for Jesus, et al and the evidence for the tooth fairy is not a valid comparison.»

A first point seems to me to be this: to overcome [the] false idea of man's autonomy as an «I» complete in himself, whereas the «I» is fulfilled in the encounter with the «you» and «we»... It is fundamental to recover a true concept of Nature as the Creation of God that speaks to us... and also of Revelation: recognising that the book of Creation, in which God gives us our fundamental orientation, is deciphered in Revelation, which is endorsed in cultural and religious history, not without mistakes, but in a substantially valid manner, to be further developed and purified anew -LSB-... fostering] openness of the «I» to the «you», to the «we» and to the «You» of God.

You take it as a winning position because other people can't show your statement to be false, but they hold no valid point to begin with.

However, I see the existence of God as a valid point of philosophy / metaphysics / theology that is worth debating.

Any Christian ethic to be valid must take its starting point from the revelation of the nature and will of God as this has come to us in Jesus Christ.

Now as to why Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed the essayist makes a very valid and erudite point.

The one valid point you could make is that circular logic, as with most logical fallacies, does not prove a conclusion false, it simply fails to prove that it is true.

Whether or not you find this position, one held for centuries by countless Christians (church fathers, saints, and regular Christian folk like me), to be valid, I trust that we can peacefully disagree on theological points and affirm others like the Triune God (albeit there are differences here as well — Athanasian Creed, anyone?)

I understand those who are not as impressed by his GA, since he was playing in front of Price most of the time, that's a valid point.

Except for being 10 points behind city you already mentioned, he said nothing wrong, all his points are valid and probably repeated again... we won the FA cup last year and this year as well, we need to push for something more valuable... Just promises won't satisfy us

Overall, I think the point of this article was to say that yes there are valid concerns and reasons to let Sumlin go, but why root for his failure when that means rooting for the team to fail as a whole?

Nevertheless, he does make a very valid point and he will get support from many who aren't in favour of it as it does lead to a great deal of confusion with the way it is currently used.

But if we win the FA by defeating Chelsea, then your point may be a little valid... It will be interesting to defeat Chelsea in the final as it will make the trophy even bigger and we would have had a proper final as against playing Hull city...

I will publish any posts from TRUE Arsenal fans, as long as it is well - written, grammatically correct and has a valid point to make.....

Merson is quite clearly and vocally in the Wenger Out Brigade and if the Frenchman said the sun was going to come up tomorrow I reckon Merson would disagree, but that does not necessarily make any less valid his point about the pursuit of Vardy being the wrong move for Arsenal, as reported by Sky Sports.

as eager as i am to get in new players - I'd have to say u do have a very valid point... We get class or no one... do nt want another Flamini

But I think the point about expectations is still valid, as you confirmed.

Don't frankly know enough about Van Dijk as a person other than seeing him on the field to draw a fair conclusion on that point, but yeah if that is not a valid concern then he is definitely quality!