You raise some very
valid points here, and it is worth noting that the relative silence from PATFO's end could be due to the collective bargaining agreement.
You know I have
a valid point here, but to avoid acknowledging it you resort to a straw man argument, and straw man arguments are intellectually dishonest.
Surely Robinson makes
a valid point here.
Mr. Coleman makes
a valid point here, although he is apparently guilty of that while he accuses others of.
Not exact matches
Here is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very
valid point:
While the professor is portrayed
here as being callous and ridiculing, he does have a
valid point.
My apologies, i see you did nt say all the things i reference centeredpiece, but my
point remains
valid to you and BobtheTomato, another off base poster on
here.
I meant to state that this is a reply to another article, but it has several very
valid points in relation to several discussions
here and religion in general.
In fact you know full well I and others
here have made several
valid points you've deliberately ignored because you don't have the integrity to acknowledge it when someone else has refuted your horribly flawed logic.
Here, yet again, the revisionists have leaped from a
valid historical
point to an invalid historiographical conclusion.
Whether or not you find this position, one held for centuries by countless Christians (church fathers, saints, and regular Christian folk like me), to be
valid, I trust that we can peacefully disagree on theological
points and affirm others like the Triune God (albeit there are differences
here as well — Athanasian Creed, anyone?)
Everyone
here has
valid perspectives and
points; this is a really great discussion.
Having read through all the comments
here my analysis is this: everybody
here makes a
valid point.
I do nt really understand why Kev ia on
here as he is always moaning and negative... Midkemma made a
valid point that Sead os a left back / left - sided and was then subject to an onslaught by Kev Is there no moderation on this site?
Yes like we have been kicking on for the last 9 years; but you make a
valid point - out of top 4 means top players leaving and good players not wanting to come
here - something like Liverpool faced.
I think the second
point here is also
valid, by the end Jalen goes into «hero» mode and starts attacking the lane and sharing the ball less....
Herb, you actually do normally come out with a lot of
valid points for me, even if they extend more towards the negative than some on
here and I don't always agree with all you say.
I believe you have
valid reasons behind your convictions and I respect your
point of view and decisions as a parent that you've written about
here, but you strike me as somewhat dogmatic in your views and your opinions come across like verdicts from above.
The discussion
here has been very instructive and I can actually see
valid points on both sides of the issue (less government vs. more government intervention) when talking about children's nutrition at school.
Both sides have some
valid points but what I am
here for is my own experience as a mother of 2 wonderful healthy boys.
Ever the scientist begging for data on this
point, I'd say that another equally
valid conclusion from the article linked
here is that perhaps the improvement in kids» behavior from improved food and drink is like the link between crime and graffiti.
Click
here to sign up and you'll get a +5,000
point bonus when you join Dealspotr, complete the new user checklist and post your first
valid deal.
Your supervisor's experience can be particular helpful
here, as he / she might be able to suggest scientifically
valid reasons to exclude certain
points.
But this proclaimed «new science» has been
here all along, before Ancel Keys report and the subsequent McGovern led Senate Committee, the Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs final 1977 report that contained a few
valid dietary
points, but vilified saturated fats and salt.
A lot of
valid points are scored in passing against the celebrity - industrial complex, but there's not enough real news
here.
won't get into dissecting Barber's article
here, because though she definitely made some
valid points about the discrepancies in self - publishing authors» quality, financial situations, marketing versus writing time, etc., it was an opinion piece based on her traditional publishing experiences (she's not a self - published author currently).
Okay,
here you may have a
valid point.
Kind of a bummer in my opinion but there's a
valid point to be made
here in that nobody should take themselves too seriously when talking about comics (haha, funny, right?).
So, instead of a Dog and Pony Show, we'll just list a few good,
valid, to teh
point reasons
here that retaining Vanguard Home Inspection of Greater Knoxville is the right choice for you and let you decide for yourself:
Now, at this
point, you may want to remind me: a) shorting junior resource stocks can be difficult / impossible, and / or b) only a real idiot couldn't figure out (& take advantage of) such a blindingly obvious strategy!?! OK, in my defence: i) again, I
point you to all those academic studies, and ii) there are legions of muppet investors out there who will (rather incoherently) argue the exact opposite in strategy... So
here's the
valid alternative to that trade
Here's two versions on the offer: Get 3,000
points when you spend you spend $ 250 or more Get 3,000
points when you spend you spend $ 600 or more Offer Terms Must activate first; activate by December 24, 2017 Offer
valid through December 24, 2017 Purchases must...
I have to say, he makes some pretty
valid and convincing
points here.
However, many people will disagree with my choice for number one due to the sheer amount of glitches and problems that the game has had since launch, and that's a perfectly
valid point, but
here's the catch: I haven't actually had any major problems.
But if you all could please give me a minute before you label me biased and move on (fun fact: All of us
here at Toy - tma are biased), I believe I have some
valid points to why I think this would work as well as I believe.
Now, it probably sounds like I'm just bragging
here (and that's probably
valid), but I say it to make a
point about the 8 - bit and 16 - bit game era: The games weren't necessarily difficult, per se, they just rewarded repetition and memorization.
Now, it probably sounds like I'm just bragging
here (and that's probably
valid), but I say it to make a
point about the 8 - bit and 16 - bit game era: The games weren't necessarily difficult, per se,
But the
point here is not to replicate this for the sake of it, but to discover whether the conclusions drawn from their analysis were
valid by testing their procedure in test situations where one knows the answer already.
«If you can come up with a significant number of people
here who think studying STDs is wrong, then your
point will be
valid.»
There is another option open to Roger, instead of nit picking and engaging in innuendo and making false accusations, he can demonstrate convincingly and quantitatively to all
here that he has a
valid point that has a marked impact on the paper's findings.
manacker, while the
points you made are
valid the main issue
here is that the whole analysis is flawed since the F3 (AGW) is no longer an exponential.
Appeal to majority, the logical fallacy you apply
here to score a cheap
point, does not provide any
valid scientific evidence.
Sadly, because the method of selecting start and end
points has the appearance of being deliberately selected by CMS to find the figures that most confirmed the prior reasoning, than any
valid method — we've had this discussion
here at CE, years ago, when Girma was pulling the same stunts — it is of course going to be the outcome that
valid methods find this flaw in the endpoints CMS proposed.
In this regard,
here is the webpage of a retired atmospheric science professor who is sort of stickler for describing the greenhouse effect correctly: http://www.ems.psu.edu/~fraser/Bad/BadGreenhouse.html He is a bit militant in what the correct pedagogy is for my taste, but I think he does have a
valid point that thinking about it in the wrong way can lead people astray.
I know you've been busy
here tonight and I think you have many
valid points on the good work by many on TOBS.
The
point made
here by Stefan and Dim seems
valid but faces difficulties in its practical application.
I leave it to objective readers
here to determine whether the blogger's claim is
valid and whether whatever
point I made about «losing an argument» was
valid or not.
Some great advice
here, we do things a little differently in the UK but I can see your
points are
valid.
But
here's the reality about subjective realities: all
points of view are
valid.
I think there have been some very
valid points made
here pertaining to wholesalers, and a common theme that I have seen in this thread is that maybe some dealings with one or two «bad» wholesalers have really caused some people to be completely biased against «any» person identifying themselves as a wholesaler or has anything to do with wholesaling.
You have a
valid point - the only reason I was considering Denver is because since I am
here I could potentially look at the properties and review deals easily.