Sentences with phrase «valid points were made»

A couple of valid points were made, but much in the draft texts was either wrong or irrelevant.

I agree with you about how the immersion can easily get wrecked and honestly a lot of very valid points were made in the comments, but if TESO actually turned out to be a success, they could profit from it and put their mistakes out of the picture with a fallout MMO.

The problem Brigitte, when you go on these long philosophical journeys, is that you show not the slightest ability to pay attention to (or even comprehend it seems) the very valid points being made by all the commenters who have attempted to reason with you.

Hello, I think there are some valid points being made on both sides of the discussion, although there seems also to be a rather ungracious, unforgiving tone.

I think they miss Richard's point, mistake his character, and close themselves off from the very valid point he's making.

As with the best of these DIY spoofs, which startle us into realizing we actually agree with Hitler, there's a valid point being made, if a somewhat obvious one.

Those are valid points you're making about why elite status might not be worth it.

Not exact matches

But the truth is that not all complaints are valid, and not all ideas meritorious; it is the leader's responsibility to make measured, informed decisions, and not to pander to data points of one.

Here is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very valid point:

While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.

@Christine, Points well - made; your criticisms are indeed valid in some respects, arguably way off in others, but I get the gist of what you're saying.

I agree with what you have to say to a certain degree, and the points you make about New imam quits embattled Islamic community center — CNN Belief Blog — CNN.com Blogs are valid ones.

I make no apologies for my comment, but even IF DWaters was trying to make valid points, the very problem is that they are still thinly veiled racist comments and seriously missing the point at * best *.

When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc. make blanket statements and refuse to respond to corrections, criticisms, or valid points refuting those statements, then there is no point in bringing up any kind of argument.

It doesn't make the point on which you're so laser focused any less true or valid that there are also other reasons and benefits to the manner in which we disposed of bin Laden's body.

You may speak well occationally and even make a valid point occasionally, but I think deeper in you is a mean spirit.

The fact that you people completely ignore pretty much every question I pose to you is evidence to me I'm making valid points you don't want to deal with.

My point being that taking a member of the set of all things Jesus never explicitly taught on and positing, if only by implication, that his silence is an endorsement of that thing is not a valid foundation for making a sound argument.

Hand you been a man, and engaged in keeping with your desire I would have expressed fear that the valid points made in the comment challenging the «feminist approach» had been overlooked and critiqued your deference to the dominant ideology with the victim narrative, challenging what you want to «urge» me to do.

Fair enough, I mean, you make a valid point that one of the biggest things about the democractic party is trying to legislate so many different things when there are certain aspects of my life that the government should have 0 say over.

Mr. Blair's point is that such arguments should be allowed and encouraged in the public sphere as valid means of making moral arguments.

When one of the speakers made a valid point not good for both parents to be working 12 hours a day and then come home and that there were differences between men and women with a protective and a nurturing side respectfully, Kelly did become agressive.

This means that, whilst all interpretation is provisional (which I think might be the main point you are making) not all are equally valid.

@Chad and @Chuckles, You both make valid points about who knew what and when and I'll admit that I am not a WWII expert, but again saying that we, the world, did nothing but watch while 6 million Jews were killed, is misleading.

That is a MUCH more valid point than the one the author tried to make about emotions.

Yes, of course Gerrie makes a valid point, and oddly I suppose so do you, but I'm having fun being obstinate.

Unless the discussion in the preceding pages has entirely failed to make its point, it will be plain that what is being proposed in this book is (as I have said) a «de-mythologizing» of the inherited notions of «life after death», with their (to many of us) impossible assertions; and also the «re-mythologizing» — or better, the re-conceiving — of their implicit intention so that we may have a valid way of affirming the value and worth of human existence, its significance and importance for God, and its preservation in God as a reality which has affected the divine life and in God has acquired an enduring quality which nothing can take away.

(For link fans, the video & notes may be found at http://www.calvaryccm.com/teachings/main/video/GS49.aspx) He made a very valid point: if the crucifixion was all there was to life in Christ, Jesus and His Father could've «done it over the weekend,» rather than take 33 years... especially that last week.

I would posit that an argument could be made for the existance of Christianity if Paul had not been invovled as equally valid, therfore this being a moot point.

O'Malley is especially single - minded in eschewing the use of terminology such as «liberal» or «conservative», making the valid point that such broad groupings were not easily identifiable at the time and were often marked by a certain fluidity in connection with particular issues.

Trolls aside, I think Mr Gross is making a valid point from a Godly perspective.

qs: «The point you make is valid; you can be a good, moral person without ever having been polluted with petty religious nonsense.»

My point is valid but you just don't want to see yourself that way so you make excuses as to why your un-provable belief is better than someone else's, and the excuse you are using is «Well everybody else believes this way so it must be true.»

If someone raises a valid point, they frequently turn to «well Jesus said we would be persecuted, so that makes us better followers.»

From what I can tell, those who hold to «Christ - esteem» instead of «self - esteem» make some valid points, but are still guilty of many of the things they accuse the «secular self - esteem» proponents to be guilty of.

While valid, both points could have been made just as effectively in a subtler manner.

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

And he is even humble enough to concede when others are making valid points to their arguments.

The point he was making remains valid today: ours is an «age of science,» whether we like it or not.

I think you make a valid point that Christian believers may combine scriptures on our own, without necessarily being aware of how various Jewish commentators have viewed their scriptures over the years.

REED makes a valid point that real change is going to come not only from restoring the victims of sex trafficking but in challenging the mindsets and environments that condone or promote it.

2) she makes a very valid point, and she is absolutely correct about the bible having many different interpretations.

Now as to why Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed the essayist makes a very valid and erudite point.

The one valid point you could make is that circular logic, as with most logical fallacies, does not prove a conclusion false, it simply fails to prove that it is true.

You make some valid points, all of which are made irrelevant by using the term «retarded».

when people get all huffy over my misuse of words or just plain wrong use of them i laugh, because i can bet my life that you still understood my meaning but rather then discuss the issue i brought up chose to insult thru the means of an english teacher — that i care not for... my point was a valid one and it makes me sad that you think yourself so far above me that you won't even bother with the conversation... tisk tisk.

I do believe the other reviewers have some valid points but there are solutions to make these even more like a traditional cupcake.

I realize there is a lot of controversy on this issue, and both sides make valid points.

You make a valid point there Mr Jonestown but the point I was trying to make is this, RA ttnds the game on a weekly basis he invests in the club Ive no doubt that he is get healthy return in some form or another and perhaps it is way of writing off certain monies et al..

In turn, perhaps DT makes a valid point as even when not scoring Lacazette contributes to Arsenal's build - up play and he cost significantly less albeit he's two years older, but naturally there will be many who strongly disagree with his suggestion.