Sentences with phrase «valid points you're making»

And like with Sian above, I fear that in doing so, you have missed valid points made and explained about the misogynistic patronising of women, manipulation of women's feelings and lying to women.

Hand you been a man, and engaged in keeping with your desire I would have expressed fear that the valid points made in the comment challenging the «feminist approach» had been overlooked and critiqued your deference to the dominant ideology with the victim narrative, challenging what you want to «urge» me to do.

There were a few valid points made... and the end made me cry, again.

In addition to all of the valid points made by other breastfeeding supporters, what was noteworthy to me was that the mothers in the intervention group were taught to supplement their newborns with biologically appropriate feeding volumes consistent with the recommendations of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine.

However, there are several valid points he makes, including that inflammation is a huge part of story as to what causes heart attacks, and that omega 3 to omega 6 ratio is important.

There are valid points made in this article, and then it's almost completely undone with an inane discussion of websites and pdfs.

Are there valid points made among the criticisms?

It's a shame because it distracts from the very many valid points you make in connection to your area of expertise.

A similar tactic suggested by the 17th century French mathematician, Blaise Pascal, acknowledges valid points made by the other person and then considers how they may fit into one's own broader plan.

I think there have been some very valid points made here pertaining to wholesalers, and a common theme that I have seen in this thread is that maybe some dealings with one or two «bad» wholesalers have really caused some people to be completely biased against «any» person identifying themselves as a wholesaler or has anything to do with wholesaling.

Not exact matches

Maria also made a valid point: «Marketers shouldn't feel bad for marketing themselves.

But the truth is that not all complaints are valid, and not all ideas meritorious; it is the leader's responsibility to make measured, informed decisions, and not to pander to data points of one.

While you made a number of valid points, what about the factor that you do not pay taxes on the growth of your Roth IRA?

Here is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very valid point:

I have read this column, and I think it makes some valid points.

While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.

You make some valid points, and it details the unknowns involved with planning out an aggressive timeline for than a year into the future.

You make a valid point.

@Christine, Points well - made; your criticisms are indeed valid in some respects, arguably way off in others, but I get the gist of what you're saying.

I agree with what you have to say to a certain degree, and the points you make about New imam quits embattled Islamic community center — CNN Belief Blog — CNN.com Blogs are valid ones.

However the person going by»...» has a valid point and you have proven it by making this as.sumption!

I make no apologies for my comment, but even IF DWaters was trying to make valid points, the very problem is that they are still thinly veiled racist comments and seriously missing the point at * best *.

And when people like societyvs or myself make valid points... you ignore them.

When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc. make blanket statements and refuse to respond to corrections, criticisms, or valid points refuting those statements, then there is no point in bringing up any kind of argument.

George Weigel's essay offers valid points about the importance of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), but he makes two errors.

It doesn't make the point on which you're so laser focused any less true or valid that there are also other reasons and benefits to the manner in which we disposed of bin Laden's body.

For the record, if your post actually makes a valid point to challenge peoples faith, the moderators will not let it post.

You may speak well occationally and even make a valid point occasionally, but I think deeper in you is a mean spirit.

In fact you know full well I and others here have made several valid points you've deliberately ignored because you don't have the integrity to acknowledge it when someone else has refuted your horribly flawed logic.

The fact that you people completely ignore pretty much every question I pose to you is evidence to me I'm making valid points you don't want to deal with.

The problem Brigitte, when you go on these long philosophical journeys, is that you show not the slightest ability to pay attention to (or even comprehend it seems) the very valid points being made by all the commenters who have attempted to reason with you.

My point being that taking a member of the set of all things Jesus never explicitly taught on and positing, if only by implication, that his silence is an endorsement of that thing is not a valid foundation for making a sound argument.

The hermeneutical structure she adopts undercuts the valid point she wants to make.

Fair enough, I mean, you make a valid point that one of the biggest things about the democractic party is trying to legislate so many different things when there are certain aspects of my life that the government should have 0 say over.

Mr. Blair's point is that such arguments should be allowed and encouraged in the public sphere as valid means of making moral arguments.

When one of the speakers made a valid point not good for both parents to be working 12 hours a day and then come home and that there were differences between men and women with a protective and a nurturing side respectfully, Kelly did become agressive.

This means that, whilst all interpretation is provisional (which I think might be the main point you are making) not all are equally valid.

@Chad and @Chuckles, You both make valid points about who knew what and when and I'll admit that I am not a WWII expert, but again saying that we, the world, did nothing but watch while 6 million Jews were killed, is misleading.

That is a MUCH more valid point than the one the author tried to make about emotions.

Look up what Baal worshipers did... Educate yourself so you can try to make valid points when you argue.

Hello, I think there are some valid points being made on both sides of the discussion, although there seems also to be a rather ungracious, unforgiving tone.

Yes, of course Gerrie makes a valid point, and oddly I suppose so do you, but I'm having fun being obstinate.

I've always heard that when someone resorts to insults, they have no more valid points to make and have lost the debate.

Unless the discussion in the preceding pages has entirely failed to make its point, it will be plain that what is being proposed in this book is (as I have said) a «de-mythologizing» of the inherited notions of «life after death», with their (to many of us) impossible assertions; and also the «re-mythologizing» — or better, the re-conceiving — of their implicit intention so that we may have a valid way of affirming the value and worth of human existence, its significance and importance for God, and its preservation in God as a reality which has affected the divine life and in God has acquired an enduring quality which nothing can take away.

But typical, you don't have a valid point so you try to put down the other person to make yourself look better.

On that last point, I made these comments which still remain valid today.

Fenton doesn't make very good / valid points.

(For link fans, the video & notes may be found at http://www.calvaryccm.com/teachings/main/video/GS49.aspx) He made a very valid point: if the crucifixion was all there was to life in Christ, Jesus and His Father could've «done it over the weekend,» rather than take 33 years... especially that last week.

Surely Robinson makes a valid point here.

I would posit that an argument could be made for the existance of Christianity if Paul had not been invovled as equally valid, therfore this being a moot point.