Sentences with phrase «valid question which»

«This is a really important and valid question which we unfortunately can not answer yet,» says Pot.

and a valid question which he never answers, what was he thinking when doing the team sheets?

Not exact matches

An invisible man in the sky is not a valid explanation for questions for which we don't yet have answers.

When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?

Although psychology, for example, may show that many human relations which are thought genuine are actually neurotic projections from the past and hence I - It, it can not question the fundamental reality of the I - Thou relation nor establish any external, «objectively» valid criteria as to which relations are I - Thou and which I - It.

Near the close of the book, Barr again seems to despair of his subject and calls for works in the «Christian doctrine of the Old Testament,» since «traditional Old Testament theology... has often tried to solve questions which, properly speaking, can not be solved within the horizon of the Hebrew Bible itself and within the boundaries of its resources» (this last is a very valid point).

The question, therefore, is whether such a concept of a cause to which the infinite reality of pure act belongs as a factor constituting it without becoming an intrinsic constituent of the entity of the finite cause itself, but in some way remains free, detached from the process of becoming, but provides the real ground of the self - transcending operation of the finite agent itself, is a valid and demonstrable concept, or only a paradoxical and intrinsically self - contradictory construction which can only conceal the fact that our thought has reached an impasse.

But philosophy publishes results which claim to be universally valid if they are valid at all, so we now turn with our question to philosophy.

We need a new development of Catholic theology and philosophy which is true to the defined teaching of the Church and which can also answer the valid and sincere questions which have far - reaching implications for Christian faith.

The answer to the second question, that of advance in man's religious quest, must depend on the criteria which are judged valid for measuring advance.

My point, however, is that His actions in this world have consequences which we should be able to detect, so some science questions about God are perfectly valid.

The question is, why are the hate filled tenants of the Koran no longer valid but the passages in the Bible are (which is older by thousands of years)?

My fellow gunners Wenger is a failure either you admit or not, though this is a preseason match which is less important just to make the players gain fitness, before the competitive matches commence, but at the same time Wenger's tactics and formation should be questioned especially against big teams, he had conceded numerous goals against big teams in which today's match is a reflection of what we are talking about, his old and out dated philosophy is no longer valid in modern football, no wonder Alexis Sanchez can't confide in his plans to propel the team in winning major honours, Wenger still believe in some of the bunch of fringe players he should have gotten rid of in the team and replace them with world class players or players that are hungry for success like Alexis, anyway there is still much time in the transfer window presently to do that, if he can change the hands of time and stop being too stubborn.

The authors argue that instead of policies that just strengthen marriage — which more and more people are questioning, and rejecting, as a valid institution — we should be supporting all intimate relationships as well as enlarging the legal and social definitions of family to reflect the many types of families we have today.

too broad - if your question could be answered by an entire book, or has many valid answers (but no way to determine which - if any - are correct), then it is probably too broad for our format

Re Q # 3: The current answer ``... emission from greenhouse gases... adds to the warming at the surface» is a true fact but is not a valid answer to the question of how the greenhouse effect alters surface temperatures (which underlies the judge's query).

It's a valid question — one that Kulreet Chaudhary, M.D., might have asked some years ago, back in medical school, before she had completely changed her approach to healthcare, which eventually led her to pen this new book, The Prime: Prepare and Repair Your Body for Spontaneous Weight Loss, released earlier this month.

So, kind of sidestepping the issue of whether it's a good thing to see yoga as a way to lose fat, or whether losing fat should be held up as an ideal, anyway (both of which I think are certainly valid questions), it's often highly questionable whether «weight» is the best gauge of that, anyway...

REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS: A bachelor's degree or higher with at least 24 credit hours in content area Valid IndianaTeaching License for Grades K - 5 or 6 Demonstrates strong writing skills as evidenced by a written response included with Application, answering the following questions: o Describe one experience where you made a significant difference in a student's academic achievement.o Describe a time in which you have used student data to drive greater levels of student achievement.o Describe one way you have successfully integrated technology into your classroom.

too broad - if your question could be answered by an entire book, or has many valid answers (but no way to determine which - if any - are correct), then it is probably too broad for our format

It depends a lot on the country (which makes this a relevant question to travel), but often all you need is an address in that country and a valid visa even if it's a short - term one.

A valid question and one which I'm sure at least a few of you will have asked yourselves by now.

Re Q # 3: The current answer ``... emission from greenhouse gases... adds to the warming at the surface» is a true fact but is not a valid answer to the question of how the greenhouse effect alters surface temperatures (which underlies the judge's query).

Attempting to discredit global warming by questioning the use of models is not a valid criticism — if you want to dispute the data upon which models are based, feel free.

Ironically enough, you have played that game yourself here in these pages w / r / t the debate about voter ID — which, IMO, clearly touches on valid questions of integrity that both sides raise.

Since I know no quantum mechanics at all, one of the questions I had hoped some reader would resolve was how valid quantum - mechanical considerations leave Velasco et al.'s result (which assumes a continuous phase space).

The problem if it's not applied (I think) is that the NOAA figures being compared include it, which begs the question as to whether eg figure 20 is a valid comparison.

It appears to me the sensitivity question is insoluble, and pretty much any value in the solution space may be valid for a given combinaton of surface ice, sea, solar, particulate and so forth conditions, some of which are feedbacks.

Although his comment suggested such, I doubt that he really believes that individual commenters here were responding because something had been «deemed urgent» by some unspecified «deemers,» and, (2) it seems to me that you might be drawing conclusions from Lewandowsky's research that (assuming you find his research methodology to be valid — which some seem to question) are not supported by the evidence he offered: Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist» side.

First, there is significant divergence between reconstructed and actual temperatures since the mid-1980s, which, until valid reasons for this phenomenon have been found, can only question the ability of tree - ring data to robustly model earlier periods that could have been similarly warm (or warmer) than the present.

,» which is an extremely valid question.

[Response: Dear Isaac, you've got a potentially valid point, that hinges on the question which we have not really clarified yet: how important are differences in temperature, and how important is the absolute value of temperature (which does come in due to all the non-linearities, e.g. Clausius - Clapeyron, which are not just small second - order effects).

Unless the filer understands the laws well, it is hard to respond to some of the questions — which, by the way, are very valid and legitimate questions for the USCIS to ask.

If a forum state's courts have «general jurisdiction» over a defendant, this means that the defendant can be sued in that forum on any cause of action against that defendant arising anywhere in the world, regardless of any other relationship that the claim has to the forum state (except for claims in the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts which can be brought in a U.S. District Court located in the same state, or in an arbitration forum pursuant to a valid arbitration clause that binds the parties, an issue beyond the scope of this question and answer).

Each repeats the same formulation of the ways in which immunity may be waived, distinguishing between the equally valid methods of waiver in a prior written agreement and an acceptance of the jurisdiction of the court in the face of the court and the proceedings in question.

Feetum & Ors v Levy & Ors [2005] 1 WLR 2576 (Lewison J. — Chancery Division) Question whether the appointment of administrative receivers of a limited liability partnership was valid, which depended on the scope of the project finance exception in Section 72E of the Insolvency Act 1986 to the prohibition in Section 72A.

The traditional tests for the validity of a marriage in Canada (which adopted the rules established by the English courts in the nineteenth century) was that a marriage had to be valid (i) where it was performed, by the lex loci celebrationis, and (ii) by the law of the parties» ante-nuptial domicile, usually referred to as the question of «essential validity».

While the Respondent argued that the decision to proceed by special case was a discretionary one to which deference was owed, the Appellants argued that the special case was not appropriate because: the questions posed in the special case rested on a hypothetical assumption that the agreements were valid; necessary facts were not included and not all the facts were agreed upon by the parties; and the parties did not sign the statement of special case as required by Rule 9 - 3 (3)(c).

However, that did not resolve the present question, which was whether a compromise such as the one in this case, where the court did not know that one of the parties lacked capacity, could be valid.

Bear in mind that machine - processed algorithms now exist which are capable of providing valid answers to «legal» questions.

Whether it was possible to prove by evidence that a form WP / PP, which could not be found, had, in fact, been executed in a manner complying with HFEA 2008, Pt 2 and whether, if that was permissible, and the finding was made, the fact that the form could not be found prevented it being a valid consent, as involving a breach by the clinic of its record - keeping obligations — this was a factual question, the court had to be satisfied the form (which was lost) had been signed before treatment.

to be SO BEEFY and chunky; which is a valid question... because it... [Read More]