Sentences with phrase «valid theory of»

An implication of this idea is that a holistic and relativistic approach to human experience not only is a more valid theory of human nature, but has important clinical implications for helping people lead more fulfilling, energized lives.

«The research by Rubinstein and McCarthy is proving valid our theory of action.»

As one professor was heard to remark, no theory of jurisprudence that gives the «wrong» result in Roe v. Wade could possibly be a valid theory of the law.

In other words, a valid theory of justice requires an internal distinction between the formative principle or set of principles that should be explicitly articulated in a democratic constitution and the substantive principle or set of principles that ought to determine decisions taken in or through the full and free political discourse.

The first and last answers come from scientists: we expect to find one, and only one, valid theory of nature.

Not exact matches

We'll have a better idea if this theory is valid over the next couple of months if the market continues to trend sideways to lower.

Winning the lottery for thousands of years is not a valid theory.

This can not be argued and no scientist will ever support scientism other than a philosophical application or non falsifiable extrapolation of a valid scientific principal or theory.

There are millions and millions of nonDeist Christians who believe the theory of evolution is valid.

what makes your reasons more valid then all of the others theories out there?

If you think for even a nano - second that citing an article published by a magazine put out by «lay Catholics» is a valid source of information on the theory of evolution, you friggin» azz, you need more help than anyone here can provide.

If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.»

I think the possible existence of God, or the idea of God, or the theory of God, is more valid to explore than the possible existence of Bigfoot, or the idea of Bigfoot, or the theory of Bigfoot.

Accordingly, the remainder of this essay will proceed as follows: I will first seek to show that the meta - ethical character of every claim to moral validity includes a principle of social action by which a universal community of rights is constituted, so that no moral theory can be valid if it is inconsistent with these rights.

I think most of Crosson's theories are valid and I believe that the core group of Jews that spread their belief that a man named Jesus rose from the dead were initially thought of as political resurgents out to overthrow the government.

Science eventually proved those theories to be correct, but that doesn't mean that every crackpot theory is just as valid as any other because some of them were proved correct — that's stupid reasoning!!!

You have jumped on the Theory of god and proclaimed it to be valid.

You might as well disband most Catholic schools a swell, since most of them definitely teach that evolution is a valid theory.

This doctrine is a necessary condition for the limitation of independent variety, which is, in turn, a necessary condition for «valid inductive inference» to predictions and to theories.

It would seem, then, that a possible construal of valid induction» (inferences to predictions and theories scientists find to be good inductions) might be the following inference pattern.

I wish to suggest that Whitehead held a theory about the «explication of the concept of «valid induction»» quite similar to (2).

I merely wish to point out that the internal relationship of entity and environment which is required for any «valid induction» may be a doctrine of a metaphysical theory which does not include the doctrine of prehensions.

What he needs is not theories (however valid) about love but the experience of love.

But one thing is certain, and it appears to me that its recognition in theory, and acceptance in practice, must be the sine qua non of any valid discussion and effective action affecting the political, economic and moral ordering of the present world: this is that nothing, absolutely nothing — we may as well make up our minds to it — can arrest the progress of social Man towards ever greater interdependence and cohesion.

Creationism is not a valid theory, so don't use a «God of the Gaps» mentality and just put «God» where you can't see the answer easily.

On the other hand leaders of the Bible school movement have been developing a theory of liberal arts education with the Bible at its center, and through an accrediting association have moved toward standardization and steady improvement of a program which seeks to synthesize conservative evangelical Christianity with a valid educational ideal.

Many of his ideas stand on their own as valid and useful, independent of the theories.

The theory that we've missed out on a golden opportunity might be valid if we were still the cash - strapped 4th - place team of five years ago.

Actually, there are a number of theories and each seems just as valid as the next.

«The secretary of state acknowledges that clauses 2.43 and 2.44 of the Funding Agreement, and clauses 23E and 23G above do not prevent discussion of beliefs about the origins of the Earth and living things, such as creationism, in Religious Education, as long as it is not presented as a valid alternative to established scientific theory.»

3) Your theory of science is appalling (all human endeavour is «made up» and this doesn't differentiate valid sociological from invalid sociological knowledge).

BHA Head of Public Affairs Pavan Dhaliwal commented, «In 2011 our «Teach evolution, not creationism» campaign called for enforceable rules saying that creationism can not be presented as a valid scientific theory in any publicly - funded school.

It is his firm view that the teaching of creationist views as a potentially valid alternative theory is not acceptable in a 21st century state funded school.»

If so, what is the current status of such a challenge as far as how valid the legal theory is?

In 2008, several political analysts [60][61][62][63] discussing the Bradley effect referred to a study authored by Daniel J. Hopkins, a post-doctoral fellow in Harvard University's Department of Government, which sought to determine whether the Bradley effect theory was valid, and whether an analogous phenomenon might be observed in races between a female candidate and a male candidate.

and many religious students appeared to reject evolution because of their faith even though they understand that the scientific community accepts evolutionary theory as valid.

«Here the general theory of relativity, Einstein's theory of gravity, is no longer valid,» says Eric Poisson of the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada.

These somewhat contradictory theories, none of which is universally valid for all cases, have now been unified by Oehzelt and developed into a single coherent model based on the electrostatic potential caused by the charge carriers in the metal and the organic semiconductor.

Any theory that lets bizarre brains randomly pop into existence can't be a valid description of the universe.

With current observations suggesting that dark energy comprises more than 70 percent of the matter - energy density of the present - day universe, astronomers say that measuring the apparent shapes and the distribution of galaxies in the Universe will constrain the nature of dark energy and allow them to examine whether the general theory of relativity is still a valid description of gravitation on scales of billions of light years.

Evolution is a valid scientific theory for the origin of species that has been repeatedly tested and verified through observation, formulation of testable statements to explain those observations, and controlled experiments or additional observations to find out whether these ideas are right or wrong.

Yet, with the very valid tenets of the auteur theory in mind, films co-directed by two distinct voices are special cases, especially in the case of the magnificent documentary Faces Places.

Below is a breakdown of the lesson objectives: * All students will know the main measures of an economy * Most students will have an idea of what the UK economy is currently like * Some students will know how different factors can effect the UK economy The lesson looks at the basics of the following macroeconomic concepts with definition, examples and valid video links: * Inflation * Unemployment * Economic growth * Gross domestic product (GDP) * Balance of payments * Exchange rates The lesson concludes with a nice multiple choice quiz to test students on the lessons theory.

As seen in our theory of action model, there is not only alignment among curriculum and instruction and assessment, but also a continuous feedback loop among the three, as each informs the others to provide a valid and accurate measure of student learning.

Tahlia and Claude, I would respectfully say that your points on marketing are valid with regard to the theory of legacy publishing, but not, for the most part, to the reality.

Looking at the audited values of accounts of a subset of managers is not valid — we would need to look at all accounts following the same theory, and unsuccessful accounts don't line up to be identified.

They pretend that only half of the theory exists or is valid.

Similarly, just because the CO2 theory is based on valid science, it may not correctly explain the cause of the recent warming.

When the issue is a generally valid theory or statement it is extremely irritating to see that 95 % of the posts confuse USA and the World.

On November 28, the paper told policymakers to ignore science because it could hurt jobs and increase economic hardship «in the name of global warming theories» its editors don't believe are valid.